cwsox

I called you out by name? I responded to your post. If you were trying to say I missed it. What you think is "complete hypocritical bulls***" and what I think are two different things, obviously. I cannot track how this angry exchange or anger exchange here began. I never had any anger towards you. It is not worth it. I cannot think of more to say. On some things we totally and absolutely flat out disagree. You have wrong before and you will be again. I think of the anniversary of the Beatles on Ed Sullivan... whether it was February 2nd or 9th I have been wrong many times. It is a risk of living and thinking. I have no quarrel with you nor anger at you. And my state has more electoral votes than your state And your state's football and basketball teams suck too!

anytime you have a saturday or sunday in mind let me know

534 is my section! Something has come up for me this weekend PM me if you want tickets for Sat and/or Sunday

hell that's right, we sat in the UD in Milwaukee separately together didn't we, in 2001? where do yu usualyy sit at USCF UD?

post away my brother

see why I sit in the upper deck? None of that visual trash comes close to me! Since I am right behind home we can call the balls and strikes just fine and seevery play in the park but on really fat guy on dug out night, furry mascots on dugout nights, and Caribbean night (jive dancing furry mascots on dug outs) all of that stuff is far enough way it can't touch me!

I feel like I am picking on you today - sorry! That would be, we lost the season series to the yankees 3-4. Still better than we might of thought pre season.

if he nips it in the bud that will be one thing but I sure as hell hope he's not nipping anyone in the butt, at least not in the clubhouse

Seeing it once was enough more than enough I thought he was around like for a season or two in the 90s and maybe not at every game but at enough (once was too many).

To mock Hillary for who she is - the wife of Bill - is to ignore the GW is the son of GHW. Political conversation comes when you can understand that you complain about the winner of the popular vote being elected - that is democracy - can you then at least understand that others may feel differently than you and accept their viewpoint as valid, not mock it, even though you disagree? In some people's opinions, Hillary has done much. Your view, nothing. Can you accept the validity of the feelings of others? I could easily say: I live in the USA and i can not stand that G W Bush is a president here. What exactly has he done except try and raise his political rank? Nothing. He has done absolutely nothing for us. He didn't even win the majority of the vote. The Supreme Court is so republican, and that, coupled with the fact of who he is, is why he won. I have zero respect for him and am ashamed that he supposedly represents me, and i am also upset that he has not done anything constructive for our nation. And yes, we have many problems here that need addressing. I prefer Hillary to GW. I think she is smarter, works harder, has a far greater intellectual curiousity, and is no where near as rigid and closed to new concepts. For the election, I certainly feel that Kerry is the far preferable choice on those factors alone.

I know that - just making sure everyone else does!

oh, give us a link for those of us too lazy to want to click a couple of places!

that is about right for a hamster - no guilt, she was happy - used to raise them as a kid - after Annie, Hammie, and Sammy, I forget the names of the others...

that was brando's theory, Jose as heart of the team, but I didn't buy it much in 2001-2003 and 2003 conclusively proved that no, we don't win more on the Jose factor. I do agree that the times, they are a'changing. I am liking Uribe more and more.

not to revive the old debate but Clayton did hit higher than Jose at least one year and Graf always seemed more than adequete the difference that I can see is that Uribe might actually win the job permanently

not sure that I understand - we had Clayton and Graf

thank you! Thank you!

agree or disagree with Brando and on StJosE6 and D'Lo I certainly disagree with him - but one ignores Brando at one's peril - as with several others here, he's got a good eye and picks up on things sometimes well before others

sweet dreams to everyone here we are getting far afield and I am not further traveling down the road of sparring with people I value so God's rest to all, sleep well!

perhaps because Chelsea never used Secret Service agents to get them alcohol while underage???????????????? I think the press has been really kind on Jeb's daughter and on brother Neil

your opinion I could respond Hilary raised a great daughter and Laura raised drunks who broke the law but beyond that comment I am not going there - it all depends on one's perspective and since you see yourself as justified, fine, Peace be on you.

in your opinion

or not

Frank is a HOF player. Sosa is a celebrity Prior is white boy marketable. We know who is going to get the PR. Everything Ozzie is quoted as saying is undoubtedly stretched a tad but yet true. But should he be the one saying it? Whose team does our manager follow? Watching the inches of newspaper columns is not one of his jobs, I wouldn't think. The Sox pr staff should be working the editors, not Ozzie. Meanwhile Oz has caused the cubs to buy a few new bulletin boards because there is a lot of bulletion board material here. That is one reason I don't like trash talk. If they have the season of their dreams and we tank or even come out just so-so, all of Ozzie's comments will be shoved right back at the body orfice of your choice by your cub friends.

A buddy of mine parked at the Progressive Baptist Church on a Saturday night and had ashes from the fireworks all over his car - now since then the location of the fireworks has moved... always thought about parking there but always ended up in the Sox lots when I don't take the el