-
Posts
6,261 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Cerbaho-WG
-
Got there at 1130 and no bobbleheads. Ridiculous.
-
8/27 Gamethread - Good Guys v. Evil Empire
Cerbaho-WG replied to clyons's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Bahaha, Linebrink. -
8/27 Gamethread - Good Guys v. Evil Empire
Cerbaho-WG replied to clyons's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Jeter looked like he was stuck in concrete. What s***ty range. -
8/27 Gamethread - Good Guys v. Evil Empire
Cerbaho-WG replied to clyons's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Omar! -
8/27 Gamethread - Good Guys v. Evil Empire
Cerbaho-WG replied to clyons's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Fan interference. Kick that f***ing idiot out of the game. -
Well, Hoffman can aim for 600 or get a shot at a WS title. He'll probably retire at the end of the year.
-
QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 23, 2010 -> 01:57 PM) And he'd kick your ass for calling him a stupid human being if he saw you on the street. Ah, yes, the typical senile old man post. Yes, greg, I'm terribly afraid that 5'11 slap hitting ex-MLB player in his late 40s would viciously beat the s*** out of me. Greg, you're a wonderful poster because your posts, without fail, always reach a level of pure, crystallized stupidity and ignorance that one simply has to admire. Someone who calls a well known journalist a homophobic slur is not a smart person. Someone who criticizes his indirect source of income by telling them to go f*** themselves and to not spend money on his team is not a smart person. Someone who lets his spoiled brat of a kid badmouth his boss is not a smart person. While I don't expect to have a conversation with Ozzie about Kant's categorical imperative, I would expect Ozzie to rise above his current conversational level, which can only be described as Highlights for Kids with profanities.
-
Looks like Ozzie controls his family as good as he manages the Sox. Hopefully he blurts out another sexual/racial epithet and we can just fire him. He's a stupid human being who shouldn't hold a management position for the rest of his life.
-
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 22, 2010 -> 05:30 PM) Just because something is arbitrary doesn't mean that it's not useful. No, because to you close is something different from what I think. You absolutely cannot use such crap analysis as a linchpin to your argument unless you know absolutely nothing about statistics. If you're dumb enough to trot out such tripe you deserve to be called out on your ignorance.
-
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 22, 2010 -> 05:21 PM) To be fair though...the idea of an arbitrary "close call" is something that a statistics guy should criticize, but that doesn't mean it's not something that could be judged by a guy who knows the game some. No, it's completely arbitrary and thus bulls***. You can't roll out a statistical survey and have your big headline be something arbitrary. It's something Chad at State U. will eat up because he doesn't know any better.
-
QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Aug 22, 2010 -> 04:37 PM) Actually, ESPN did a study during a 2 week period, and then discovered that umpires made the right call only 66% of the time. They reviewed every close call of all the games over that 2 weeks. It was like 184 games or something. Nope, sorry. Unfortunately ESPN can't do statistical analysis if the company depended on it. Here's the low down from a person who actually understands statistics instead of a bunch of brodogs at Bristol who just REALLY LOVE SPORTS: http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/08/esp...blows-call.html
-
Linebrink? What the f***?
-
The hitting approach to this team is ABYSMAL.
-
Gordon!
-
Ozzie must be trying to lose this game. 3rd inning for Jenks? What the f***? And now Jackson up in the pen. Bizzaro world.
-
QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 22, 2010 -> 03:32 PM) Yes with man on in eighth and none out, why not bunt him over? Then you have 2 chances for clutch hit. Because percentage wise a runner will score from from first w/ none out more often than a runner at second with one out. Look, you can keep sucking Ozzie's knob but we're going to keep calling you out for your idiocy.
-
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Pena still out there. Inexcusable. -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 21, 2010 -> 11:25 PM) My stance is I love Ozzie, but hope you guys get your new manager so we can have a revolving door of managers in the future. So basically you're willfully ignorant. Great to know. -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
ozzieballlll -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
QUOTE (fathom @ Aug 21, 2010 -> 10:25 PM) It's sad what we have to show for the 5 big trades we've made in last two years. Who would have thought Pierre would be the best trade? Good point. It's really impressive that Juan has put up a .350 OBP when that includes the first month of the season where he did almost nothing. -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Jesus....Mark Kotsay, everyone. -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Technical difficulties! f*** yeah! -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
!!!! Alex! Where were you in Gm 1? -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Not a HR. -
Sox @ Royals, Sox @ Royals, 8/21 x 2
Cerbaho-WG replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Frank needs to unbutton some more buttons.
