LDF

radke, 10 - 7 with a 3.59 ers his innings pitch so far is 190+ his walks allow is 19. he has had one season with a era more that 4.50 and that was the yr he was hurt. if i remember right he was injured the yr before. either way he has always pitched in the 190 + innings and walks allow in the 25 or less . look at the whip and his historical stat of that. brad is a very good pitcher.

let alone all the "ira" attacks.

yeah i forgot about jackson. thiller.................. man it took me a while to figure what the hell you were talking about................ man that is way too funny.

good reasoning, is there anyone else we are missing, could those be players who is injured as well.

damn, you are right....................... wow ok who are you and have you done with the real apu?

milton has always had great stuff and always put up real good numbers. the one number that still bothers me is the hr allowed, other than that. they are great numbers.,

EXCEPT FOR THOSE STUPID POP UPS. ughhhh

i thought it was extremely funny but i wasn't sure what you were ref it too.

Mohandas Gandhi award,................. if there is i want it!!!!!

i4e and for that fact, cerb have a temper............... wow i thought i was bad. just got to work with it and try to do thing in a positive light. peace.

kool, let that stand as it. i am with you on this. man, i have had it out with some of the old timers here and its been really nasty. trust me . but we are still civil now. with time this will pass on by.

to be honest with you and if you look at where i stand, i don't really want pavano here as well. but i was really trying to look at others point of view to see if was justified in my belief. i want pedro and/or perez in that order for pitching, then radke and followed by milton. i should explain, what i meant for the sox to look at acquiring until one of them says yes.

what have i said about that stuff, you don't have to win every discussion or to be looked at in a positive light. you should have left it at that. peace.

are all those player are the only ones that the sox got rid of? mile jackson, cliff what his name, would you consider wunch in that group?

describe what a good yr was and how that translate in giving up potential. if we are going to break this trade down please explain to me the royce clayton trade and the botch trade for starters.

i4e, did make a distinction by saying "radical". now this he is not guilty of what was said to him on this note. however, if he continues to wait in the weeds so to speak and used those times to make a point, i can see how people will get tired. i am not advocating i4e, but i will and have made my comments to him on this thread and other threads. with the new policy in use, i am sure he has change his approach in this. let give him a new slate.

why????

you got a very good point on the age. based on that, do you think we can afford let alone go thru another medicore yr of watching garland???

let alone getting botch and clayton.

btw does anyone know what the attnd has been up to now? has the 2 mil been broken yet?

on the flip side, you can't assume he didn't, right.

i remember a huge amount of posters here wanted ponson, and i didn't. but i wish someone on this board will give a good reason on why we should sign him(pavano).

i was neo from the matrix

that is what i am afraid of. i wish the bulls coulda gotten a draft pick out of this.

signing pavano is what scares me. i am not too sure i am sold on him. but he is young, so the potential may be there. i don't know.