Spiff

i'm not sure you ever even tried, at least anything more than "you are stupid therefore i am right"

jeez you suck at debating with people.

Exactly. I am totally different now. And yet, one or two years ago you had no problem with me, i find that interesting. Dont you? double talk. the only problem i have with you, like anyone, is when you act like a jackass. done with this thread.

Haha, whose ass am I kissing exactly? Whether or not I become a permanent moderator is not in doubt, so what exactly would I be trying for? And what happened to, "that was the bmr of two years ago, I am totally different now"?

So he attacked Metallica, go ahead and defend Metallica. Jumping on him with some dumbass remark about "probably works at McDonald's" doesn't refute his argument. I would be saying the same things whether I was a moderator or not. I doubt I'll even be one for much longer, I'm just filling in for the people who are on vacation. And as for being a "daver wannabe", the only people I've even said anything to about being a jackass are you and your wannabe, clujer; which, again, I would have said even if I wasn't a moderator. You two go around looking for fights, it's lame, it's annoying, and it makes you look small.

Yeah im sure that just kills Metallica and their self esteem coming from some guy who probably works at Mcdonalds..... I'm sure that will kill Critic's self-esteem, coming from someone who doesn't work at all. Yeah that hurt lol. Last time i checked, i had two job offers, making more money than youll make in 10 years. Anyhow, i dont called people "irrelevant" who are way more successful than ill ever dream to be. Its ignorant, as was your post. You don't know how much money I'll make in ten years, and I don't care how many job offers you have. Bottom line is this; quit attacking people personally, and stick to debating ideas.

Yeah im sure that just kills Metallica and their self esteem coming from some guy who probably works at Mcdonalds..... I'm sure that will kill Critic's self-esteem, coming from someone who doesn't work at all.

haha, making up quotes for articles is what New York Times reporters do best. But anyway it was New York magazine.

so what shockey has said in the past presents an M.O., doesn't mean he called parcells a homo this time. either way there's been no indisputable evidence, and that is one of the things our legal system is based on. nice try though.

the bottom line is this. what you two nimrods can't seem to understand is that never in putting shockey in my sig did i declare my subscription to the Jeremy Shockey school of thought. never did i say modeled myself after him, never did i say i agreed with 100% of the things he says and does. all i said (not verbally, though most people i believe can pick this up) is that he was a good player, one of my favorite players. look at your sig, you have tara reid. and even though tara reid likes having sex with men, that doesn't mean you like to also (to the best of my knowledge). you like her because she's hot, not because of her philosiphies on life. clujer has a metallica sig apparently because he likes their music, but metallica is a bunch of annoying whiny b****es the rest of the time. this doesn't mean that clujer is an annoying, whiny--alright maybe that was a bad example, but you get my point. if i could take back shockey calling parcells a homo, i probably would (though that is another can of worms, as shockey denies ever saying it and there has yet to be cold, hard evidence presented proving that he did. but when it comes to kobe nobody can go five seconds without clujer reminding people he hasn't been proven guilty). but that doesn't mean i still can't like the way he plays football. and as for being "not anti-gay", if you want to crucify me for that, go right ahead buddy. i wasn't aware that was such a deplorable character trait.

you find where i said i was "pro-gay" and show me.

sweet, that's great news.

wtf I am pro-gay because I don't like people following other people around and calling them gay all the time? wow, how terrible of me. having a shockey signature is so much worse than the people who are actually following others around and calling them gay.

eliza dushku. 'nuff said.

2-0 rays, bottom 2 2-0 twins, top 3

I think DiFelice was the one b****ing, but I'm not positive about that.

yeh borchard, despite his recent hot streak, has me concerned. but i don't know as much about minor leaguers as other people, so maybe i'm interpreting his numbers incorrectly.

cut the s***

When it comes to 1-A vs. 1-AA, it's rarely ever close.

haha that batman one is badass.

i suggest you get a life. i never said the man was a genius. i like the way he plays the game of football, he is a good player, he is one of my favorites because he is on the giants. the end.

no such thing as a sure thing.

i do, and i was just listening to an interview with randa on the radio, when it was over the host said "thank you, joker". so i guess he embraces his joker face.

What are you talking about, you know no photographers are even at the games they play Lack of interest. Besides "Cross-eyed" Crawford isn't very camera friendly in graphics-maker language this means, "I do not want to do it right now, go away and maybe sometime in the next three weeks I'll get to it."

So mature for your age! Does this mean you drinking and gambling in Vegas illegally? Well either way, have a good one, and maybe you'll get a White Sox winner. P.S. I started this thread cause I know how much you like my sig.