SkokieSox

Naive take

Sorry for your loss… that’s a terrible experience to lose your mom like that. But I standby that you shouldn’t have been required to take those vaccines to see her, or for any reason.

Covid killed many people, sorry for your loss. But that doesn’t give credibility to the vaccine rolled out. Something bad happening doesn’t give you or the government control of someone’s freedoms or autonomy.

Take all the vaccines you want

There’s plenty of unconstitutional decisions on the books, doesn’t make it right. My point wasn’t whether the US thinks it can mandate or not, it’s that they shouldn’t. Freedom allows for personal choice. And since the covid vaccines were brought up, there’s strong evidence they’ve done more harm than good. You still can’t get a PI that describes everything in them. It was experimental. Definitely should not have been mandated.

Health interventions are a choice. I would lump in seatbelts and helmets, because the liability rests with the individual. Speed limits are not health measures, no strong feeling there. No mandated injections.

You make a weak claim, people obviously have a right to refuse based on the exemptions allowed under the constitution. People’s freedom don’t get circumvented based on alarmist public health sentiments. And suggesting a fear of needles is driving that is unserious and just meant to be condescending.

That’s emotionally charged, not a serious argument.

You’ve missed the point entirely

No evidence that’s the case. And freedom is the hallmark of a civilized society.

It’s not much of an argument to ignore the points being made. Red Herring

I’m against forced mandates requiring injections.

Seatbelt laws regulate behavior, not medical procedures. Vaccine mandates involve injecting something into someone’s body, which raises a different level of ethical and legal concern. Supporting vaccines or social safety nets doesn’t automatically mean supporting government-mandated medical interventions. Plenty of countries with universal healthcare rely on voluntary vaccination rather than coercion. Public health works best when trust is maintained, not when compliance is forced.

Mandates are bullshit, and the lawsuit includes anticipated health costs. Certainly the lost revenue is debatable but there should be accountability in general. I’d be interested if he attempted an exemption or tested refusing and how that translated.

$10 million and hefty incentives based on health and performance

Fire him up with some TRT and peptides, and start playing 2005 highlights.

He lolligags. It’s not his speed, it’s his hustle. Rookie just called up, bust your ass out of the box.

He looks slow out of the box, I want to see more hustle

“He has great bat-to-ball kills“ Sold 😎

Over

Apparently there’s openness to discuss an extension, but: "Everything happens for a reason," Crochet said. "Ultimately, the right move was made, and here I am." sounds like he’s disappointed in the outcome of being here. When you involve yourself in the process, regardless if you feel like you’re right or not, you reap what you sow.

Maybe a sign a recession is imminent. Shed money off the books and keep cheap assets.

That is indeed a problem

That’s really on the other side of the trade to consider. Sox should absolutely be “cute” with this move.

‘To inject three offensive players into our organization was a wise move,” Getz said. Vargas viewed as middle of lineup hitter He would’ve been better off not commenting