knightni

If Alex Smith somehow gets a bunch of votes between now and midnight, I can change SF's pick.

2,000 registered members as of today!

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Mar 18, 2005 -> 12:06 AM) If only you started the poll a day later though Knight. You mean the "Alex Smith - Standing Ovation" article? It was in the first poll, people still voted Rodgers.

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Mar 18, 2005 -> 12:03 AM) i wouldnt book Rodgers to San Fran yet after Alex Smith's recent workout which was supposedly amazing. This isn't necessarily what will really happen, it's what Soxtalk members vote will happen. Rodgers got the most votes, so, he was the 49ers pick.

2005 NFL Draft 1. San Francisco - Aaron Rodgers - QB 2. Miami -

They couldn't get Canseco immunity, so, I guess he's going to state the fifth. :headshake

So, Frank isn't there in person.

Schilling would have a tough choice to make: Take the position Ruin his position as head of the players' union Increase his chances of getting into politics after his playing days Don't accept it Keep in favor with the players and the union Possibly blackball himself from a future in politics

"I recommend you do the same" BURN!

QUOTE(YASNY @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:41 PM) You'll discover that pride ranks a distant second to money, fame and pussy. That would be a distant fourth then, wouldn't it?

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 01:21 PM) I do agree with Juggernaut mostly. Sure I think steriods shouldn't be around the game, but it's not because of the players that took them. Sure maybe there was an indirect influence, but that's just like watching the show Tilt and going and gambling and losing all your money, then killing yourself. The show Tilt didn't say anything about gambling your money away. What? That's not a good comparison at all. Steroids affect moods negatively, which can lead to suicide. Watching Tilt (all joking aside, as it is lame) doesn't affect you and make you want to commit suicide.

They are trying to connect Artest/Jackson/O'Neal to steroids.

The MLB players will be in part 3 of the hearings, they are still in part 2.

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 12:16 PM) I watched a little. My TV is Broke now becuase it has a shoe in it. Mr. Bunning, If you have a problem with Mr. Bonds, maybe you should invoke his name, use some actual evidence, not hide behind innuendo and misinformation. You can get it on your computer. (You DO have another shoe to use, don't you?)

Darn those people and their "work".

Yeah, we crashed it I guess.

You should get headphones, maybe.

5 times.. wow.

I FOUND IT! Scroll down and click on Live Feeds: CSPAN3 Real Media and Windows Media are two options there.

http://www.CSPAN.org/ has a "watch" button on the main page, but I can't get the media player to play anything.

Well, per my Ethanol thought... Right now, in Michigan, Ethanol makes up 10% of the gasoline bought. It's considered an "additive". Ethanol, for the uninformed, is a fuel made by grain or corn processing. I believe that open wheel cars drive on an All-Ethanol fuel now because it burns cleaner and is safer and less explosive. I just don't know why the government couldn't at least increase the amount of Ethanol in Gasoline in the short term to avoid the gas price hikes. 25% would help quite a bit. It would be safer, burn cleaner, reduce the amount of oil needed from the Middle East and save us all money. It would also help farmers by increasing the value of their crops. It must make too much sense to be considered by the US Government. :headshake

QUOTE(Steff @ Mar 17, 2005 -> 11:28 AM) Anyone see any video coverage of this anywhere...? Do CSPAN or CSPAN2 have it on?

The voting will continue until tomorrow. (Or, if I get a mass majority or a minimum of 15 votes.)