Buehrle>Wood

I was following on box score. Why did Duke pitch a full inning in a 1 run game in the 9th?

Lol abreu

Since Sands is just completely useless, at least call up Leury to PR. He should never play though. Then again he can't be worse.

Picked off? Box score following

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 21, 2016 -> 11:43 AM) There are 2304 BOUND delegates, and 168 unbound. If someone gets 1237 of that number, they are golden. But they can also win if they get over half the bound delegates (1153) PLUS 168 other bound delegates to overcome a 168-delegate swing even if they lost them all. That's the 1321 number in total delegates to reach to win that other way. Not that it matters much, because in the end I don't think Trump gets 1237, let alone 1321. It's possible, but things have to go very well for him in a bunch of states (in May particularly) that he's not likely to do well in. Okay I see what you're saying but I believe it's still a very flawed way of looking at it because it assumes all unbound delegates are aligned with 1 person. The truth is they are all already accounted for in a lot of cases (Pennsylvania not withstanding). Trump does not need to worry about all those unbound delegates because they're already aligned with Ted Cruz for the most part. They are inlcuded in Cruz delegate total. Trumps delegates are almost all bound to him counting towards his 845 number. He needs to worry about 1237+how many unbound he ends up with. That number is closer to 1260 then it is 1321. Also, almost everyone agrees now that Trump has an easy path to 1237. Even in worst case scenarios (like somehow getting 0 in Indiana) he should still easily get there. I'd like to see your path where he doesn't get to 1237. It would have to involve losing California (where he's ahead by 18) and essentially every state aside from New Jersey in May/June. Here is my best guess at a worst case scenario for him: Pennsylvania: 17 out of 71 (wins state, loses every other delegate) Connecticut: 22/28 Delaware: 16/16 (wta) Maryland: 30/38 Rhode Island: 14/19 Indiana: 10/57 Nebraska: 12/36 WVa: 28/34 (direct elect) Oregon: 10/28 Washington: 14/44 Montana: 0/27 (wta) New Jersey: 51/51 (wta) New Mexico: 18/24 South Dakota: 0/29 (wta) California: 150/172 Even in this scenario where I have him not just losing, but getting crushed in Indiana, Nebraska, Oregon, Montana, Washington and South Dakota as well as underperforming big time this Tuesday, he still gets there.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 20, 2016 -> 01:33 PM) Most of PA's are unbound. Trump probably wins there. And then there are the 3 RNC delegates for each state in many states, where there is more wiggle room too. What I'm saying is... Trump is under 1237: Contested convention Trump is 1237 to about 1320: Contested convention Trump 1321 or higher (give or take): He wins no matter what Where are you getting the 83 delegate difference there? That infers to me Trump has 83 unbound delegates but he doesn't have near that many I wouldn't think. Or are you saying the 83 is PAs potential unbound delegates+Trumps current unbound delegates? That makes more sense, but in the scenarios I laid out in was giving those all to Cruz.

If Danks gets lit up, we riot

Lawrie

When Coats is called upon there's not going to be any more pressure than there already is for a rookie put in a starting role. He also 26 already so hopefully a little more mentally mature than most. I'd like to see the move for Avi now. We know that won't happen as the Sox have Stockholm Syndrome with Avi. The first place excuse is also BS as the reasons we are in first have nothing to do with Avi. You can still exchange the awful parts of this team to make it better.

I would call Saladinos defense great at 3rd last year. That said I'd rather not move around frazier.

Sands also has 8ks in 13 PA with some absolutely pathetic looking at bats. He really just doesn't make sense for the roster as most of us have said. Ishikawa isn't ideal because he isn't that good, but at least he fits in with his glove and being lefty.

Spotify. I guess that's not really storing but you can DL it and listen to it offline, so that counts.

So much has been said about the thibs departure that I wouldn't believe a word of it

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 20, 2016 -> 12:20 PM) Hamilton to stay on $10; Tubman replacing Jackson Wonder how much that Hamilton play influenced this change? Originally, Hamilton was supposed to be gone and Andrew "Trail of Tears" Jackson was to remain on the $20. Jackson is still on there. Tubman is going on the other side. I like the move. Gives more space to honor everyone instead of the random "illuminati" stuff and bland buildings that people don't even notice are there.

Sales scoreless streak snapped at 16.

QUOTE (bjm676 @ Apr 20, 2016 -> 03:08 PM) Anyone else seen enough of Jerry Sands? He has 8ks in 13 ABs. I think even Matt Davidson is jealous.

How is Pujols both tossed there?

But very few of Trumps current delegates are unbound (basically the ones from the territories). So very little switching can occur even in such a scenario. Its Cruz delegates who are unbound. Even in the scenario I listed above I was essentially already giving cruz the 54 remaining delegates that are not bound.

You put too much emphasis on Indiana in that post. He could lose that with 0 delegates (he'll get some and perhaps win, but let's assume 0) and still be in fine shape. Assuming he wins California and NJ like he should, he would just need 50-70 delegates out of the 222 available in Nebraska, WV, Oregon, Washington, Montana, New Mexico, and South Dakota. Hardly asking a lot for the front runner.

QUOTE (Brian @ Apr 20, 2016 -> 11:26 AM) Who are the Nazis? The Harris Brothers. Former tag team if you remember them with a Nazi gimmick that turned out wasnt really a gimmick. They paid for the last tapings and get the company if TNA doesn't pay them back today. They are brokering a sale for Aroluxe, some company that I don't know about. It's like a bad TNA angle turned real life.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 20, 2016 -> 09:38 AM) Trump now needs 53.4% of the remaining available delegates. He needs 392 more. Next Tuesday he should win all 5 states(up 20 in Connecticut, up 20 in Pennsylvania, up 17 in Maryland, up 18 in Rhode Island Feb poll, no Delaware polling). I'll call it for him getting 120 out of 172 total delegates. Cannot see him losing New Jersey or California. That has him looking for, I'll say, 70 delegates out of the 279 left in the states yet to go that I didn't mention yet. Shouldn't be too tough. He's winning in a lot of those states anyways. Indiana in 2 weeks should all but clinch it if he can get a decent majority (remains to be seen).

I like that, but more reason for Ishikawa to be here?

Eseason and Feinstein cant stfu about NY in them.

Anyone have a rationale for this? Seems stupid and a nice way to draw terribly. It's also vs a team who has a history on screwing us with times I believe.

Except that wouldn't work.