fathom

All the usuals played for Brewers A+ team today

Levine on the Score soon to talk about Sox

QUOTE (steveno89 @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 10:02 PM) Based upon pure upside right now? Acuna is likely right near the top, although you could certainly argue a case for Moncada and Rosario as well. Yes pure upside as a superstar

QUOTE (GoGoSox2k2 @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 09:54 PM) raBBit == of all the teams interested, which top prospect (main piece) do you most want? yanks (Frazier) braves (albeis or acuna) Rockies (Rodgers) Brewers (Brinson) Not rabbit but to me, Acuna is best prospect in baseball

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 09:46 PM) That's probably fairest of the four but I would take that for Q right now and not look back. I think people need to adjust their expectations. I'm not expecting Brinson in a Brewers deal and have a bad feeling the Sox view Ray as a premier prospect

QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 08:43 PM) None of those teams would make those deals. If Brewers think that's too much, then not sure I want the Sox talking to them

Or it's going to be awful weather in South Bend and don't want him getting hurt

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:31 AM) K0na fell off the planet after the last trade he broke(Peavy?) I think it brought some unwanted fame and probably put a little heat on his source He broke the Danks extension and the Edwin Jackson trade also

QUOTE (flavum @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:25 AM) I need Ken Rosenthal to make this all real. If he says something after the game tonight, then I'll legit think it's happening Wednesday. More like kOna

QUOTE (Quin @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:21 AM) What did the anonymous GMs say it would coat Milwaukee for Q or Gray? Brinson, Hader, Phillips

QUOTE (flavum @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:18 AM) Anyone checking minor league lineups tonight? No AAA or A+

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:16 AM) At the very least, McGuffey's original tweet has been confirmed (assuming that the "unconfirmed" part was people being wary of his credibility). I think Rabbit's recent tweet (If Jose pitches for the Sox again it's likely because of a sudden, significant impasse) is a concrete rumor WSD retweeted it so his initial tweet today was clearly something related to Q

Also think Kahnle or Swarzak could easily be involved as Brewers need late inning help

QUOTE (daggins @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:06 AM) I love Brinson, but if he's coming, then the secondary pieces will probably be underwhelming. FYI Woodruff is 43 in BA top 100

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:02 AM) How much do you like Brinson? I don't love him. Is Brinson AND Hader too much? I like Woodruff more than Hader. Haven't seen enough Brinson but I know scouts raved about him in ST

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:00 AM) That seems a bit sparse to me... Just going off idea of them getting top 30 bat while also being a package that might be disappointing. Something to keep in mind is the Brewers prospects have sucked this year for the most part (not Brinson)

So if it's Brewers, package ideas? -Brinson seems like a must - Gatewood - Woodruff

https://mobile.twitter.com/SSS_joshnelson/s...920135219326976

QUOTE (Butter Parque @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:29 AM) I just don't see how a deal could get done with Colorado that would make us fans happy unless Rodgers was included. Who would be the headliner? Pint? Sorry, but that requires WAAAYYY too much projection to be the headliner for Q. Tapia? Like the player, but again, I don't see it as a headliner. Other than Rodgers, I don't see that main piece in their system. I like McMahon and would want him included in any trade, but he's not a headliner. Tapia, McMahon and Pint would be a good deal. With that said, I don't think Rockies trade for Q.

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:26 AM) No such thing. Sure thing to make the majors...not be a star, sorry should have clarified

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:24 AM) What's his name and who is he listing? https://mobile.twitter.com/CarasikS

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 11:22 PM) This is what concerns me about what Rabbit and others have said regarding us being disappointed... I suspect if Rodgers or some of these other headliners were involved, people would not necessarily be hugely disappointed. It makes me think we'll get more of a depth package. For the record, would hate a depth package for Q. Need at least one "sure thing"

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 11:22 PM) This is what concerns me about what Rabbit and others have said regarding us being disappointed... I suspect if Rodgers or some of these other headliners were involved, people would not necessarily be hugely disappointed. It makes me think we'll get more of a depth package. Agreed and the guy on twitter reporting the Braves interest isn't exactly listing big prospects as possibilities.

I want Q on Brewers so we can root for him next 3.5 years

Really prefer Albies isn't main piece. Seeing a few scouting reports lately that he's a bad hitter from the left side.