Everything posted by Leonard Zelig
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
K, and this ball game is ovah!
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
groundout 1U, Santos may not have tagged him, Stone is speechless
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
I think the Sox caught a break there
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Cruz K's, Hawk says, "Big out!"
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Dunn pops out, bottom of 9th, up 8-6
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Konerko 5-3
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
In less than 12 hours
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
QUOTE (Swingandalongonetoleft @ May 25, 2011 -> 01:16 AM) Well really 2 yesterday and 1 today. There is another game today...
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Q 3rd HR of night!!!!
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Alexei Ks
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
QUOTE (justBLAZE @ May 25, 2011 -> 01:11 AM) INSURANCE RUNS, MANY OF THEM Alexei, Quentin, Konerko due up
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
my bad, Young walked, Beltre lines out to right to end inning 7-6 Sox going to 9th
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
BB, then ump blows call on Hamilton stealing, 1st and 3rd, 2 out
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
full count
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Hamilton steals 2nd
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
QUOTE (justBLAZE @ May 25, 2011 -> 01:01 AM) Can someone give a play by play? Bottom of 8th, 2 outs, tying run on 1st, Santos coming in, Beltre due up
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
QUOTE (Real @ May 25, 2011 -> 12:45 AM) he gave up a run for an out in that inning. 3 outs, 3 runs. and trust me, it doesn't 'seem' like that always happens when he comes in, it DOES happen when he comes in He gave up 2 runs.
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Nice Brent!
-
White Sox at Rangers, 7:05, CSN
Freakin' sweet, got home from work right after they resumed play!
-
Hey Lawyers
QUOTE (Soxbadger @ May 24, 2011 -> 04:38 PM) Shack should have had a disclaimer on his post that he is not giving legal advice, that he is not been retained for the purpose of legal counsel and as such his post is nothing more than opinion, and should not be relied upon. That being said, in general consideration can include the fact that they are being given publicity (as publicity has value) thus the consideration part is fine. The real issues would be liability side (1) that they are releasing you from any potential liability of any kind for producing this and (2) that they will indemnify you and hold you harmless from any lawsuits due to their copyright infringement etc.) Not sure what the exact facts are, but potentially you could have copyright concerns if they are playing material that is owned by another source. If its supposed to be original music, release should absolutely contain wording that states they warrant they have full title and ownership over music and have given you a perpetual license to use, blah blah. I could go on and on, but as I said before, I may or may not be an attorney, but this post does not constitute legal advice, it is just opinion and should not be relied upon as legal opinion. Disclaimers are fun! Thanks for the advice. All the material will be original. Is there a place where I can get that bolded part written out in legalese?
-
Hey Lawyers
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 24, 2011 -> 04:20 PM) It looks fine. Good and valuable consideration would be the publicity you're giving the bands or any monies you are paying the for the right to post their performances. No exchange of any tangible goods is necessary. Thanks Shack!
-
Hey Lawyers
Me & some people are filming some videos of bands performing for use on a website. It will not be done without anybody's permission, but everybody just wants to cover their butts. Does this release look ok for such a thing? I found it on a free legal form site. Does something actually have to be exchanged to be considered good and valuable consideration? There will be no payments made. Any better suggestions? RELEASE For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby consent to the photographing of myself and the recording of my voice and the use of these photographs and/or recordings singularly or in conjunction with other photographs and/or recordings for advertising, publicity, commercial or other business purposes. I understand that the term "photograph" as used herein encompasses both still photographs and motion picture footage. I further consent to the reproduction and/or authorization by ___________________ to reproduce and use said photographs and recordings of my voice, for use in all domestic and foreign markets. Further, I understand that others, with or without the consent of ________________ may use and/or reproduce such photographs and recordings. I hereby release _____________________, and any of its associated or affiliated companies, their directors, officers, agents, employees and customers, and appointed advertising agencies, their directors, officers, agents and employees from all claims of every kind on account of such use. ________________________ [signature]
-
Beckham : 298/.379/.456/.835 in May.
QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:42 AM) Where are these splits from? ESPN says he's batting .273/.349/.436/.785 in May. Tell them to update their s***
-
5/23 Game thread Sox at Rangers
wow
-
5/23 Game thread Sox at Rangers
Is that 2 guys playing their 1st games off the DL with HRs tonight?