Rowand44

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:32 PM) He, Gload and Anderson can start a club. Anderson seriously needs to be in this game now for defensive reasons. I wonder if Ross even wears his uniform to games anymore.

That a boy Brandon. BOBBY and board the plane, please

3-6-1 RACK 'EM UP

I hope Neal is enjoying the Canadian sun cause whatever reason I don't think he's going to pitch.

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:26 PM) So in your opinion Ozzie has been great with his handling of the bullpen and matchups out of the pen this year. I'm pretty sure I've ripped on several of his moves this year and I said in that post that he's not a good in game manager but you also don't need to make 5 posts basically saying the same thing.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:25 PM) Heh, I called it before the fact. I knew he would leave Garland in too long. It was so predictable. I think most of us here knew Jon would stay in.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:22 PM) Are you honestly going to tell me that Ozzie didn't gift-wrap the Jays a run by leaving Garland out there for one more inning at 97 pitches? Mackowiak is winning himself a job. Nope, but you seem to think Ozzie can do no right. Despite his in game managing problems, we don't get near the ws without him last year. You practically rip the guy every time he makes a pitching change or doesnt. You just don't need to hammer the point in after you've already made it in the thread.

UH OH

QUOTE(Heads22 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:19 PM) Level of Trust: Jenks Cotts Thornton BMac Cliff Nelson Ditto.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:20 PM) He walks too many batters. Maybe that's Ozzie's fault.

Bah hum bug

QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:18 PM) You never should put the go-ahead run on, especially to face a guy who has 2 HR's this game. Normally I'd agree but I'd much rather have Cotts vs bay then Bmac vs Glaus right now but it worked and Ozzie is smarter then me.

Cotts/Jenks please.

IBB Glaus and go cotts/bay.

This team needs a kick in the ass.

This run is as good as in, you know cat will make contact.

Nice swing.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:05 PM) He gave up 6 hits, 2 walks, and 4 earned runs in 6 innings at 97 pitches. His ERA is now 6.11. Doesn't look like a good outing to me, especially since he wasn't getting any groundouts and he's a sinkerballer. You aren't grasping what I'm trying to say at all, so whatever, I'll just stop.

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:05 PM) The story I remember pre 2005. Is that Jon would look like a world beater, then the 5th inning would happen and then he would f***ing implode. QUOTE(Dick Allen @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:05 PM) Wasn't the one real bad inning his problem prior to last season? He has talent, and will pitch an occassional gem, and its possible he will have a year like last year again, but more likely he is was he is. A #4 or #5 starter. Guys, I'm not saying this was a good outing because he did have that one bad inning but he looked real good before that inning, that's all I'm saying. I'm not defending this outing by any means but I was pretty excited watching him through the first 5 and then he imploded.

QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:05 PM) Agreed. Anybody who says this wasn't a strong outing by Garland is an obvious stat-head. Well I'm not saying it was a strong outing, cause he pulled his one big inning routine but overall he was better today, it's something to build on but still not acceptable.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 02:03 PM) I disagree. Sinkerballers are supposed to induce groundballs, not deep flyouts. Are you watching the game? His stuff looked much better, he was jamming the hell out of hitters, pitching inside, he looked very good before that inning. Numbers don't tell the whole story.

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ May 28, 2006 -> 01:56 PM) Ground outs-fly outs: Garland 4-9 He never was dominating. Those numbers need to be reversed for Garland to be pitching well. f*** those numbers, he was looking fantastic until that inning.

Ok, well so much for him dominating. God damn it.

This is so f***in nice to see. Argh.

QUOTE(chitownsportsfan @ May 28, 2006 -> 01:42 PM) Can I get a report from someone tuned to the game of how Garland's stuff looks? He looks great on Gameday. Fantabulous. Seriously.