whitesoxfan101

Ahh that was taylor made, Jermaine has still been better lately at least.

Wow he's cruising. Let him pitch the 6th.

Interesting......but that's an out.

Not to pick on Grinderstad, but that was pathetic.

Taylor made, Barrett looked worried about that hook dropping on him 0-2, thus a double play. And lol at that trade.

That hook is nasty today.

Wow Brian and Fathom, lol. QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:22 PM) Good inning Yeah he threw a good 7 pitches I think.

Ozuna at 3rd will cost us a run at some point before this is over I bet.

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:20 PM) That was one of the few games last year that I did not either watch or attend. I see, well the only reason it was possible was how slow the runner was, lol. 2 good at bats here, that's Greg Walker magic.

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:17 PM) Dammit. I lose. For some reason I thought it was Detroit. Detroit? Don't you remember slow Molina hit it? I figured you would be confused and think the other Molina hit it, thus Anaheim was the opponent.

Wow, that hammer had some serious drop on it. No chance for Alf. Another really nice inning.

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:15 PM) Hey guys, who was the opponent last season when Iguchi did that crazy dive/throw to first. Have a bet going on here with some friends. Toronto.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:12 PM) If that ball had the wind that Barrett's homer had yesterday it was in the f***in street. Barrett's homer reminded me of the pop up turned 3 run homer that Jason DuBois hit against us there in 2005 that cost us a sweep. Not fun.

That one is a homer on most days as well, but not today. Yeesh that wind is nuts.

Jermaine does the unthinkable, and hits one through the gale to dead center. My goodness, he's been gradually heating up lately, and that was destroyed.

QUOTE(fathom @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) Can we have longer than a 6 pitch inning? This might last 8 or 9 pitches.

QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) It's no secret that the Sox see him as a future starter. That's why he's the long reliever, and not a setup man or anything Well yeah definitely, but long reliever and starter are still a lot different. Still early though, we'll see.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:04 PM) 94 on the gun from Masset. "ARE YOU NOT IMPRESSED?!?!?!" I'm learning to ignore the damn gun this season, with what has gone on. I'm impressed he had an easy inning.

I'm hoping my thought that Masset simply has starter (long term) stuff moreso than relief type stuff is accurate. Good inning there.

QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ May 20, 2007 -> 02:02 PM) Nobody hits a thousand with runners on. Go blow up the team, or something Erstad doesn't hit, or field, at all. Like I said, at least he's consistent.

2nd and 3rd 2 outs Saturday, nada from Erstad 2nd and 3rd 2 outs Sunday, nada from Erstad At least he grinds and gets bad reads to make up for it

If Juan could consistently take fastballs into right field, he'd actually be a pretty good hitter.

Ok, that's cool.

Wow we are catching some huge breaks this inning. Do something about it guys.

I really don't care how slow he is, Paulie HAS to be at 3rd right now. That was a hit from the moment of contact.