Balta1701

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 05:37 PM) Quick, disturbing stat: Scott Podsednik has drawn 3 walks in his last 24 games, after having 23 walks in his previous 22 games. I can believe that, seems like he's never on base any more

San Fran 4, Minnesota 0 right now btw.

See...now this is why Jermaine Dye for $5 milliion is a good deal.

I'm fairly new I know, but I think this is the most dead game thread i've seen yet. Ozzie needs to make some people angry or something so that people show up.

Some of the lights have gone out. Goodie. The park's 13 years old and already breaking down.

2 out, Frank up.

QUOTE(GreatScott82 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 05:07 PM) Is that rain or mist out there? I'm not there but John & Ed are calling it Mist

Strike 1...I can go home now.

QUOTE(robinventura23 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 04:48 PM) Just wait until a pinch hitter is needed. Happily there's no pitcher's spot.

Madden still belongs on MNF.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 02:49 PM) I don't think there is too much of a problem with his arm but more of mechanics and confidence issues. He still has good velocity sometimes. Mechanics could be related to an arm problem. Or they could in fact cause an arm problem. Ask Kerry Wood.

Yeah, his last injury was a freak injury, but none of his others were. His others were genuine health problems. And this one has a habit of really hurting people for a long time. Also, after he came back from his ankle injury last year he was inconsistent for quite some time. didn't really get it going until the end of the year. Prior is as good a pitcher as any in baseball...when he's healthy, but he's shown me no signs that he'll ever put together a string of healthy productive seasons. I'll take a full season of Garland over a half season of Prior and a half season of Mitre any day.

QUOTE(sayitanitso @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 02:08 PM) I was watching some documenteries on the moon landing being fake, and i looked at some pictures of the moon landing and listened to their explanations and it seemed like they were right. Im not trying to say that we never went there, but the evidence against it is there. A lot of their evidence is just wrong. Things like "there would be too much radiation" - the solar radiation amounts are not nearly high enough to hurt people, or "the flag waves in the breeze and that had to happen from earth" when the flag is just waving back and forth from the last time it was touched by one of the astronauts (the flag is actually good evidence they're really there - it wouldn't wave back and forth like it does if there was an atmosphere - its clearly undamped)

QUOTE(sayitanitso @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:49 PM) I don't mean to sound like Crazy Carl at all, but did it look like they actually went to the moon. For some reason I just don't believe that we ever went to the moon. I don't know why I think that, I just do. I don't particularly want to turn this into a lunar conspiracy thread, but can you give me a specific reason why you believe that?

QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:30 PM) still are there losing 15-0 this is great but as i type they scored 1 run 15-1 now 3 run homer by Burnitz makes it 15-5 Marlins. Burnett gave up 5 runs before being pulled. 5 run seventh for the Cubbies. Guess the "Lets Get Some Runs" worked for once, assuming someone was smart enough to throw that onto the end of Take me out to the ballgame.

QUOTE(sayitanitso @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:30 PM) And overpaid. And on a team currently in first place.

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:09 PM) Would "evidence" of an eating disorder be able to be found after she had been nourished for all those years..? I don't think there's any reason to suspect that it would be.

But at least the 2 we lost to Tampa were on the road.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 01:14 PM) My point is simple. Scientific fact is not the be all, end all that it's cracked up to be. Those "facts" change over time. No, facts actually do not change. It is merely our understanding and interpretation of those facts which can change.

They already rolled DiscoverY out to launch once. They had to roll it back to do some more work on the external tank.

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 11:26 AM) Tell me about it. Who has a better glove at 3B right now in the entire MLB? Maybe Rolen, but that's about it. Chavez too.

Come on big Jon...no sweeps at home. Let's keep pace with the D-Train.

QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 08:30 AM) Do they even have enough money to get that free agent! Not this year. This year they have only small amounts - I think they have an option on Divac, but just about everyone else is signed.. Next year they get Brian Grant's contract off of their heads (and a couple of other people), and he's making nearly as much as Kobe, so that will free up a fair amount of cash. Kobe and Odom are also making a ton. That team was about $20 million over the salary cap last year, so even then, they're not going to have much room.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jun 15, 2005 -> 05:38 AM) Wow, the earth is really going nuts. SD earthquake at 5.6, this earthquake at 7, and the Chilean quake at over 7. The earth must look like a tuning fork right now. Jim maybe you know this, could this be secondary effects of the Indonsesian quake, basically shaking the earth so hard, that some of the other faults of the world start to give way? And also do you think we could see some more volcanic activity that could be the result of, or a contributing cause to this quake activity? No, there is no relation between this quake and the Indonesian quake. While it may seem like every now and then there is a lot of seismic activity, what's actually happening is that you just don't always hear about them unless they're huge or cause a lot of devastation. Pick any growing mountain range, and you find yourself seeing a few magnitude 7 events per year. But if they happen in completely isolated areas, there's no reason for press to cover them. I think a graph like the one that follows is a very handy graph. It shows an estimate of the frequency of earthquakes per year based on the magnitude of those events. If you look, you'll see that in an average year, the planet will experience 1 earthquake of magnitude 8, 10-20 earthquakes of magnitude 7, 100+ earthquakes of magnitude 6, and nearly 1000 earthquakes of magnitude 5. A magnitude 9 event happens on average once every 10 years or so, so those events are rare in and of themselves and are worth special attention when they happen, but the fact that you're seeing more earthquake coverage on the news does not indicate that the earth is going wild or anything like that. And in terms of the volcano question...the amount of energy released by the Sumatran quake is actually essentially negligible compared to the heat lost by Earth every year. Earth is a very hot body, and it is trying to get rid of that energy as fast as it can. Some of it is dissipated by earthquakes. Lots more is dissipated by heat flow through the surface and worldwide volcanic activity. The energy of 1 earthquake is basically a drop in the bucket of energy displacement. So no, there would be no expected major change in volcanic activity from 1 earthquake. Image referred to above: (From Physics today)

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Jun 14, 2005 -> 09:17 PM) That same area had a minor tsunami in 1964 which killed 11 people. The 1964 Tsunami happened because of a magnitude 9 quake in Alaska.