Everything posted by BigSqwert
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (greg775 @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:30 PM) Farmer is annoying. What else is new.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
Could be Meche's last inning as he is close to 100.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
Kotsay having himself a nice little game.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (Heads22 @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:23 PM) Frank's arms are the size of very big legs. He is the stay puft marshmallow man.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
Twins come back to take the lead and threaten to score more.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (TitoMB @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:21 PM) 18 up, 18 down + 1 hit. 15
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:21 PM) Mark's pickoff is WOW. More like wowaweewa!
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
doh!
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
14 to go.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
Looks like there's another nice pitcher's duel in Skydome.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (sin city sox fan @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:15 PM) Lets hope Vizquel is trade bait at the deadline. There should be quite a few teams lining up to make a deal for him.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
AJ!!
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (StrangeSox @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:10 PM) how's Frank been in the both? Yeah not too bad for a fill in.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (Heads22 @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:08 PM) 12 up, 12 down for Mark. Knowing our lineup tonight we might lose if he pitches a 2 hitter.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (fathom @ May 14, 2010 -> 08:06 PM) 2 hits in 4 innings, about what to be expected from the lineup. Teahen is just the definition of mediocrity. At this point he isn't even at the level of mediocrity.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
Why oh why was he extended?
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
f***. Just bring back Dye at this rate.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
It's just amazing that in a weekend where the Twins and Tigers face good competition, giving us a chance to gain ground, Ozzie puts together one of the worst lineups I've ever seen.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (greg775 @ May 14, 2010 -> 04:03 PM) So you want Nix to DH over Omar? Nix reached base 4 times the last time he played. Vizquel will reach base 4 times over the span of two months.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ May 14, 2010 -> 03:22 PM) Ain't that the truth. Mark might have to pitch a shutout, even with Meche on the mound for them. Just imagine the pressure that puts on Mark before the game starts after he sees that lineup.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (jeffro2525 @ May 14, 2010 -> 03:20 PM) Jayson Nix gets on base four times Sunday...hasn't played since. Vizquel our DH tonight. Unbelievable. Might as well skip the DH and let Mark bat. It really can't be any worse than what Omar will give you.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (jeffro2525 @ May 14, 2010 -> 03:19 PM) Kotsay, Ramirez, Teahen, Becks, Visquel...smells like runs!!! When 6 of 9 batters are automatic outs you know you have problems.
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (Heads22 @ May 14, 2010 -> 03:16 PM) Vizquel at DH tonight. Pierre lf, AJ c, Rios cf, Konerko 1b, Kotsay rf, Ramirez ss, Teahen 3b, Beckham 2b, Vizquel dh, Buehrle p. What an awful lineup. Ugh
-
GT: White Sox @ Royals, 7:10PM, CSN, WSCR670
QUOTE (jeffro2525 @ May 14, 2010 -> 02:56 PM) I thought the same thing. Sometimes there is a "honeymoon" period with a new coach where the team actually performs better for a while...hopefully this is not the case in this instance. Hopefully the only honeymooning going on in KC is Yost and the team having a nice romantic dinner after they get swept this weekend.
-
Arizona requires you to carry your papers
QUOTE (Tex @ May 14, 2010 -> 02:42 PM) After the Tejanos defeated Mexico and gained their independence there was a dispute over where the boundary was between the Republic of Texas and Mexico. The US claimed the Rio Grande River, Mexico claimed the Nueces River. Since Mexico did not recognize the Republic as legal and valid, they never really pursued the issue. Later, when the US annexed the Republic of Texas, tensions started. With manifest destiny on every one's lips, the US basically taunted and provoked Mexico into a war. After winning the war, the US took over about half of Mexico's land. Whether you want to use the word stole or not, we were a conquering army. The public believed that God wanted the US to stretch from sea to shining sea. About 1/4th of the lower 48 is land that formerly was Mexico. Our motivation for the war was to take land from Mexico. If you like Mexico so much then why don't you marry it.