LowerCaseRepublican

http://www.homestarrunner.com check out the strong bad e-mail...quite hysterical

Seeing how we're being accused of being left wing nutballs....here is the official test!

We get the Goo Goo Dolls coming on the 21st and in December... Ultimate Fakebook and Nerf Herder are coming to Chicago to play!

LOL! :eek

It's me, General Sideshow. In my sick f*** musings around the internet, thanks to some websites I frequent...I've been asked to compile them. So, how many people watch FoxNews? Did you catch this? ----> link You'll never think about block parties the same way again. Trust me.

High school history teacher is gonna be my job. I say that I protect and value the military MORE than any of you because I say "Bring them home" where they don't have to fight a war for oil. And by the way, f***tard, I do work for a lot of what I have. I was given the basics of clothes and stuff like that from my parents, but the vast majority of what I have I earned working 50 hr. work weeks at my job over the summer and then investing in my education during the school year. I have had a lot of breaks in my life being born into an upper middle class white family. But, it is not like I have a silver spoon up my ass either. I'm not rich by any sense of the word, at all. Have you heard about the wonders of industrial hemp? The production to make that into paper is only 1/5 the cost of pulping wood into paper. Or how about recycled paper where NO tree had to die again to be used for picket/protest signs? I guess you kinda sorta forgot about recycling, didn't you? And you don't seem to come on here and tell me the wonders of what this conservative regime is doing, just knocking the liberals saying we spout drivel. You have nothing to spout. Oh, we're invading Iraq to steal their oil or....oh, we have a s***ty economy because our President doesn't wanna address it at all...or oh, our President went AWOL when he was in the Texas Air National Guard and should be arrested for treason or....oh, our President didn't even win the goddamn election or...oh, our President still can't find Osama bin Laden despite put "all our efforts into finding him". I INDICT BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES WITH A VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE! IT SAYS SOMETHING WHEN THE 2 CANDIDATES WE GET TO LEAD OUR NATION ARE A f***ING GODDAMN ROBOT FROM TENNESSEE THAT HAS A f***ING CENSORSHIP NAZI OF A WIFE...AND A f***ING COKEHEAD C STUDENT WHO CRUISED THROUGH LIFE BECAUSE OF HIS GODDAMN LAST NAME. Does anybody else find it amazing that he is calling liberals people who get everything handed to them. Yet, look at our "CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN" president...He got into Yale because of his family's riches. He got a C average there...but yet, somehow made it into Harvard Business School! Explain that, smartass! His first job after that was a head of his dad's oil companies (the major stockholder in that company, btw, was the bin Laden family). Then he used his dad's last name to get into politics and rode the coattails of his father all the way into the White House. You do know that in 1997, Dubya as governor of Texas welcomed the Taliban regime with open arms into Texas because Dick Cheney's company Halliburton wanted to build a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan with the major financial backer of this project being...........ENRON! Wow, and our lovely president thinks he can wash his hands of THAT? I think you conservatives of all people should be PISSED AS f*** at Dubya...he's cruised thru life and been given everything to him on a silver platter. So, take your head out of your ass and f***ing think before you write something, jackass.

So much animosity between everyone..did I miss something? Yup. Deep down inside, she wants me! You wish, Mike. Go back to corpsef***ing your grandmother. k thx.

What the f*** ISN'T it? Clowns, midgets, gooble gobble...it'll all be in here. Almost anything...Hell, you know it's a good time when I am a MOD.

And I see that you're reading right out of the Republican GOP Head Up the Ass Conservative Polices handbook as well.

PREACH ON BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wouldn't anyone else have gotten fired if they got caught doing that on the job? Did we need to spend the millions of taxpayer dollars to find out about it? Did we need it over every newscast for a year and a goddamn half just because Lucianne Goldberg decided to tell Linda Tripp to record her convos with Monica? Weren't there more important issues to deal with than if he got his knob polished? And to top it all off....the Republican plan didn't work! He didn't lose his job! A year and a half wasted, millions of TAXPAYER dollars wasted, and the result...he still got to keep his job. I gotta hand it to the effectiveness of the Republican party on that one.

If you believe this you really have no idea what you are talking about. Look at his policies and then tell me that he was a traditional Democrat. His signing of NAFTA is the perfect example.

I didn't say that it made it right, but if he was president....*gasp* he's still human. BTW, marijuana isn't a real drug...ask 420. Cocaine is much harder. and I'm afraid of a man that could barely get thru college is running our country because of his last name. conservatives!

Middle aged men cheat on their wives all the time! It's commonplace! Jefferson cheated and f***ed a slave...but that didn't get him impeached! Besides, Clinton was the best Republican president you guys ever had....NAFTA, anyone?

I fail to see how our current president who went AWOL in the military, abused alcohol AND cocaine, and has DUI convictions is any better.

But the economy was good..... HE GOT A f***ING BJ!!!!!! A BLOW JOB! HIS COCK SUCKED!!!! HOW IS THAT SO HORRIBLY BAD THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED?

Tell me if I am wrong, but Saddam didn't have anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. Show me evidence where Saddam did. I agree with you that Saddam is a goddamn f***twit and needs to be taken care of. He needed to be taken care of 11 years ago, when we at least had a legitimate interest to strike him. article: http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&s=editors asks a lot of questions about why the US should invade Iraq and many of these questions need to be addressed. What happened to us going after Osama bin Laden after what he did to us on 9/11? Why is Bush now having us focus on Saddam who didn't do anything with 9/11? Simple fact...Bush and the Cold War Cronie Corp. can't find Osama and they don't wanna seem like they have egg all over their face for not capturing many high ranking members of Al Qaeda. Baggio, if you want to talk screaming for more money. The Republicans will need millions (over $40 million) to fight this war in Iraq. Are you willing to give them money to fight this? Are you willing to let them tax you for this, since we are already in a massive deficit budget. (Keynsian economics didn't work for Reagan in the 80s and it still doesn't work now...trickle down economics doesn't work). Thousands of Iraqi civilians die every day due to starvation because of US imposed embargos. We do have that blood on our hands. How can we in good conscience go in and bomb these same civilians who we murder every day? http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html is an article by a former member of the US state department, WIlliam Blum. He gives direct evidence of US corporations selling these weapons of mass destruction and biological weapons during the 1980s when he was our warm cuddly dictator in the war against Iran. We gladly took his money knowing he was a coldhearted bloodthirsty dictator, but that didn't stop us from selling him those weapons did it? And now, "The chickens have come home to roost." We sell him the weapons, then turn around and blame him for having them! How can we be justified in doing that? I'd rather see President Bush deal with our slumping economy, a society where we spend double our amount of money on fast food than higher education in the past few years, and the problems with factory farming. http://www.madcowboy.com Howard Lyman, a 4th gen. cattle rancher who is vegan because he knows from firsthand experience that our current status of factory animal farming cannot be sustained by our environment. I've tried to be civil to you but this post is bulls*** on top of bulls***. First of all there is good evidence that hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague the Czech Republic in the spring of 2000. Second of all Keynesian economic is not "trickle down" economics and Reagan was not a proponent of "Keynesian" economics anyway, he preferred "Supply Side" economics and was greatly influenced by economists Laffer and Friedman. How many Iraquis suffer or die each day is a matter of debate and liberals pull statistics out of a hat on a daily basis regarding this. In any case, remove Hussein and the suffering will stop. He is the cause, not Americans or George Bush. Your best point here concerns the aid given Iraq in the 1980's. They were at the time in a war with Iran who was considered the greater enemy. Remember the hostage crisis or weren't you born yet? Regarding money spent on education. There is more money spent per capita on education in this country than ever before. And guess what? American kids are dumber than ever at least if you pay attention to standardized test scores. In Pennsylvania where I live we are in the top ten states in spending and in the bottom ten in results. You want to learn? Do it the hard way. Read, read and read some more. When you are at school or at work or just socializing with friends or family be like a sponge and absorb everything. There are no shortcuts and you are going to make many mistakes, but in the end it will be worth it. Don't expect President Bush to pass a bill that spends billions more on education and all of a sudden everyone turns into Albert Einstein. Concerning the vegan farmer. Screw him. I'll eat a steak for him, with fries a tossed salad and maybe a nice cold beer. You posted all these links, now do a little research on the environmental movement. They have been consistently wrong on just about everything. About our food supply. We have the best in the world and you can get just about any kind of meat and produce made to your specifications at prices that people in other countries would die of jealousy for. I'm ususally the nicest of nice people on the net and in person but today I have seen more bulls*** posted on the web than ever before, and I have lost my customary good nature. LIBERALISM, SOCIALISM & COMMUNISIM ARE ALL DISCREDITED WAYS OF THINKING. THEY HAVE ALL BEEN RELEGATED TO (AS RONALD REAGAN ONCE SAID ) "THE ASH HEAP OF HISTORY". THOSE MISGUIDED FEW THAT STILL GO ALONG WITH THEM ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A NOISY MINORITY WHICH HAS NO CREDIBILITY WITH MAINSTREAM AMERICA. I DO THINK THAT WE NEED A FEW PEOPLE LIKE SIDE SHOW AROUND THOUGH LEST WE EVER FORGET HOW REDICULOUS THOSE IDEAS ARE & TRY THEM ONCE AGAIN. Wait wait wait wait wait! Back the f***ing truck up here! You are telling me that conservativism is better? Explain to me how tax cuts to the richest 1% and corporations help anybody in the mass voting public? You're all just selfish greedy bastards looking out for #1 and it's just kinda sickening to see you all wallowing around in your own sick filth.

My last comment was for SI, whatever the f*** his name was.

Yes, I may be 19 years old. So f***ing what? Do you think that since you're older and you have your f***ing head stuck up your ass that you're any better than me? Because you're conservative who voted for Bush (who didn't win the election in FL, by the way) and the GOP. I am a f***ing sXe vegan, anti-war, etc...and yes, I do a lot of reading. f***, I don't get drunk on the weekends and I read...a lot. Various history books by prominent historians along with various press articles from different organizations (The Nation, Mother Jones, etc.) Howard Zinn, William Blum, etc, all authors that have a lot of basis in history (Blum actually worked for the State Department) and all believe that the Bush regime is full of s***. Yes, I knew we were in a war with Iran and that he was our dictator. Yet, you did not explain that, although knowing Saddam was a f***, we still SOLD AND GAVE HIM THOSE WEAPONS! You didn't seem to dispute the claim that Iraqi civilians die every day. They die because our oil embargos we enabled to deny them food and allowed a despotic ruler to control what little funds they do get. Tell me, why the f*** didn't we go oust him in 1991 if he was so f***ing bad? Huh? f***ing tell me! If he was so evil as you state and that he was killing civilians at that time, then why didn't we oust him then?! And the solution of bombing the f*** out of the people of Iraq, who for the most part are either to loyal to him for fear of death or hate him, is not gonna get Saddam out of power. Our carpet bombing didn't work getting the Viet Cong, didn't work in getting Hitler, didn't work getting Osama in the caves, so why the f*** should it work now? And also, b****, you wanna f***ing talk down to me because I'm only 19? Please, enlighten me with your middle aged conservative Republican knowledge. Are you going to be like Rush Limbaugh and say publically that "Cigarettes are not a cause of cancer." or "Styrofoam is biodegradible."? Yes, if you look at right wing websites, they will say that environmentalists are wrong. Please, I'm f***ing begging you, provide me with some credible insights into this. I'm f***ing pleading with you. Hell, even our Thief in Chief doesn't believe there is global warming, despite tons of scientific evidence staring him in the face. Also, my comment about fast food and education was stating that we are a f***ing nation of sloth...look at how many kids are so goddamn fat and s*** because they f***ing eat McDonalds 5 goddamn times a week...compared to the money and emphasis spent on higher education. The simple demand of what people want is clearly shown in what they purchase. You know that it takes 16 lbs. of wheat to produce 1 lb. of meat and that it takes 500 gallons of water to produce that same 1 lb. of meat. Wouldn't it be much easier, healthier, and a lot better if we didn't slaughter these animals and instead used that multitude of grain and water and the such to...*gasp* f***ing feed the starving people you were talking about? American kids are dumber because we pay our teachers s*** wages and don't give a f*** about that. Every time a kid does something wrong in class, it's never the kid's fault, it's always the teacher's responsibility. That, is f***ing bulls***. Funny how we have the best food supply in the world, but 1.2 BILLION people still go starving worldwide for lack of food...but hey, that's the American way. "ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME!" - The Conservative Motto BTW, would this "Good evidence" be from Rumsfeld and the Cold War Keystone Cops who told us that they would root out all forms of terrorism (but conveniently forgot the School of the Americas in Ft. Benning), told us that Osama was gonna be captured (still hasn't)... I'd rather have a President address our s*** economy that is continuing to take a nose dive into the toilet. I'd rather have a President who isn't a warmonger pushing around near 3rd world nations for no better reason than to beat his chest and show off the ill-created US war machine... You say we have it the best, yet we have the lowest quality of life. You, sir, are quite possibly the stupidest f*** that I have ever had the displeasure of talking to in my entire life. Let me call a proctologist and get you an appointment so you can get that head out of your ass.

sig test

No. I get as much sex as i want unlike you! Fire this nipple head!:**** Mike, for somebody so aggressive, it looks like you have a lot of sexual frustration bottled up inside of you. You should really rub one out every once in a while, Mike

Tell me if I am wrong, but Saddam didn't have anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. Show me evidence where Saddam did. I agree with you that Saddam is a goddamn f***twit and needs to be taken care of. He needed to be taken care of 11 years ago, when we at least had a legitimate interest to strike him. article: http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&s=editors asks a lot of questions about why the US should invade Iraq and many of these questions need to be addressed. What happened to us going after Osama bin Laden after what he did to us on 9/11? Why is Bush now having us focus on Saddam who didn't do anything with 9/11? Simple fact...Bush and the Cold War Cronie Corp. can't find Osama and they don't wanna seem like they have egg all over their face for not capturing many high ranking members of Al Qaeda. Baggio, if you want to talk screaming for more money. The Republicans will need millions (over $40 million) to fight this war in Iraq. Are you willing to give them money to fight this? Are you willing to let them tax you for this, since we are already in a massive deficit budget. (Keynsian economics didn't work for Reagan in the 80s and it still doesn't work now...trickle down economics doesn't work). Thousands of Iraqi civilians die every day due to starvation because of US imposed embargos. We do have that blood on our hands. How can we in good conscience go in and bomb these same civilians who we murder every day? http://www.progressive.org/0901/anth0498.html is an article by a former member of the US state department, WIlliam Blum. He gives direct evidence of US corporations selling these weapons of mass destruction and biological weapons during the 1980s when he was our warm cuddly dictator in the war against Iran. We gladly took his money knowing he was a coldhearted bloodthirsty dictator, but that didn't stop us from selling him those weapons did it? And now, "The chickens have come home to roost." We sell him the weapons, then turn around and blame him for having them! How can we be justified in doing that? I'd rather see President Bush deal with our slumping economy, a society where we spend double our amount of money on fast food than higher education in the past few years, and the problems with factory farming. http://www.madcowboy.com Howard Lyman, a 4th gen. cattle rancher who is vegan because he knows from firsthand experience that our current status of factory animal farming cannot be sustained by our environment.

::hands out baby rattles and new diapers for all::

This is an interesting post, although I don't quite agree with it. When George Wallace ran for President as an Independent in 1968 he said "There's not a dimes worth of difference" between the two parties. Pat Buchanan said similar things when he bolted the GOP to be the Reform Party Candidate in 2000. Remember Pat? He's the one that many of those dumb old farts in Florida voted for by mistake in 2000. Hey, I want to be governed by people who can't even read a damn ballot! Anyway, before I stray, you are right that money plays too big a part in politics. Money in the sense that there are quid pro quos. You are also right if you think that too many politicians are gutless pukes. As the resident old timer on this board let me say that despite this I truly believe that issues play more important a part in election campaigns than they ever did. I grew up in Chicago under Mayor Daley I and I now live in an area with a powerful Democratic party. The area is also dying. I hardly, if ever vote for any Democrats, I've seen their handiwork and it repels me. Just like I said in another thread that when I was young I saw the college left in action and said screw that. If I can't stand the Republican Party candidate then I go third party, usually Liberterian. As far as your prediction for 2004 goes, anything can happen with the economy the war on terror or who knows what. If I was a Dem big shot I'd be plenty worried because right now GWB looks like he'll be tough to beat under any circumstances. I agree with you that the Democrats don't really do anything. The difference is just a cosmetic change of who the American public wants to have ram their fist up our collective asses. Cuz the Democrats say stuff like "Protect the environment" then take money from big business and the such behind everybody's backs...the Republicans just give the bastards an office in the West Wing. JELLO BIAFRA FOR PRESIDENT!

Nuke, aside from calling you a blithering f***. Explain to me why it is a vote of confidence in them when less than half the population voted...then they only received about 1/2 of that vote? that is 1/4 of the population! 25%, that is not a majority and thusly you cannot state that there is a vote of confidence of the American people in our Thief in Chief. It's like going to a restaurant for a good meal and all they have is peaches and cottage cheese. And it's the only restaurant for miles...we get s*** for candidates, no real individual ideas and no real want to challenge the status quo, so we get a dwindling of voters making a statement that they don't want a part of this homogenous bulls***. I agree Nuke, the Democrats are out of ideas. And so are the Republicans. But with great power comes great responsibility, Nuke. The GOP has control of everything. Now, what if the economy keeps dwindling and we have other hardships? Who is gonna get dicked in the ass hardcore and take the brunt of the blame? THE REPUBLICANS. This momentary joy could just as soon blow up in your face in 2004. 2004's election day is gonna be "Revenge Tuesday".