July 22, 200421 yr Found this on another board. The Sox are 17-17 against teams who are .500 or better. This is the records of other winning teams in the AL Anaheim 19-22 Boston 16-15 Minnesota 7-12 NYY 20-15 Oakland 20-20 Texas 16-14
July 22, 200421 yr Found this on another board. The Sox are 17-17 against teams who are .500 or better. This is the records of other winning teams in the AL Anaheim 19-22 Boston 16-15 Minnesota 7-12 NYY 20-15 Oakland 20-20 Texas 16-14 This could be wrong but off the top of my head against those teams the Sox records are: Anaheim 3-3 Haven't played Boston Twins 7-3 Yanks 3-4 Oakland 1-5 Colliseum :fyou Texas 3-2
July 22, 200421 yr Second half looks like it will be fun. Minnesota has only played 19 games against a .500+ record..take away the games against us, and they've only played 9 games...can't wait until they're 5+ games back.
July 22, 200421 yr Author Second half looks like it will be fun. Minnesota has only played 19 games against a .500+ record..take away the games against us, and they've only played 9 games...can't wait until they're 5+ games back. Boy I hope you are right
July 22, 200421 yr Isn't the old phrase every team is going to win 40 and lose 40, it's what they do for the other 80 that determines where they finish?
July 22, 200421 yr Isn't the old phrase every team is going to win 40 and lose 40, it's what they do for the other 80 that determines where they finish? Close....Hawk uses it all the time... It's you're going to win 60 and lose 60; it's what you do with the other 42 that counts.
July 22, 200421 yr Close....Hawk uses it all the time... It's you're going to win 60 and lose 60; it's what you do with the other 42 that counts. I thought it was changed after the Tiger's 2003 campaign You are correct, it is 60.
July 22, 200421 yr Author I thought it was changed after the Tiger's 2003 campaign You are correct, it is 60. I have also heard it said as 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3. I guess it all depends on who you listen to.
July 22, 200421 yr Found this on another board. The Sox are 17-17 against teams who are .500 or better. This is the records of other winning teams in the AL Anaheim 19-22 Boston 16-15 Minnesota 7-12 NYY 20-15 Oakland 20-20 Texas 16-14 How are we against teams that we do not play on the west coast with winning records? We suck on the west coast and always have. What if you take away the road games against west coast teams, then what kind of record do we have? Like maybe 14-9? Do we still have to play the Angels in Anaheim? I don't remember playing them away.
July 22, 200421 yr I was the one who changed if for the Tigers....on a side note....WTF was up with Krispy Kremes.....did they have some in the booth last nite?
July 22, 200421 yr Interesting. Even the NYY are only 5 games over .500. Another telling stat is the Sox record vs. AL Central teams--as of 7-22, 4:30 pm--which is 17-8. The Sox keep up this pace and they'll win the Central. [Minn's poor record vs. over .500 teams, and less games vs AL central teams in the 2nd half should add to the Sox lead if they take care of the teams they should--Det, Cle, KC]
July 22, 200421 yr Why do our pitchers never get the outside corner to the lefties? Why is that in here?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.