July 29, 200421 yr I say we go after Sean Burroughs instead, might not have alot of pop but can still get it done
July 29, 200421 yr I say we go after Sean Burroughs instead, might not have alot of pop but can still get it done Sean Burroghs is 23, talented, and cheap. Unless we gave up Crede and Cotts(which would just be the START of the package), we're not going to get him.
July 29, 200421 yr Sean Burroghs is 23, talented, and cheap. Unless we gave up Crede and Cotts(which would just be the START of the package), we're not going to get him. I would do Crede and Cotts for him in a heartbeat
July 30, 200421 yr I would do Crede and Cotts for him in a heartbeat Problem is the Pads wouldn't. Pads want to add pieces, not give away their top young talent. They are probably the frontrunnres for the Wildcard in the NL and their is no way they will give up Burroughs, who is a very good 3rd baseman and will only get better.
July 30, 200421 yr I would do Crede and Cotts for him in a heartbeat Read everything. Crede and Cotts would be the START of the package. Crede and Cotts would NOT get him.
July 30, 200421 yr Read everything. Crede and Cotts would be the START of the package. Crede and Cotts would NOT get him. IMO, yes it would
July 30, 200421 yr IMO, yes it would Well your wrong like they said they want to add pieces not give them away.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.