November 23, 200421 yr He had an excellent year for St. Louis. I just don't see him doing it again. See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck.
November 23, 200421 yr See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck. Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base %
November 23, 200421 yr Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base % Barry Bonds had a good OBP. Joe Borchard did not. I hope that helps.
November 23, 200421 yr Barry Bonds had a good OBP. Joe Borchard did not. I hope that helps. Yes, i think I can go from there, Thanks.
November 23, 200421 yr Absolutely agree. Here are Womack's numbers: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?statsId=5158 This was his first season batting over.300 Also, can anyone tell me what is considered a good on base % Good obp is .350 and above. .400 and above obp is just excellent.
November 23, 200421 yr They say if you cannot steal 75% safely you might as well not steal at all. He said on-base percentage, not sb percentage, dumbass. Anyways, for a leadoff hitter, .350's usually about as low as I want to go. I'd prefer somewhere around .380, or even more, but I'd like .350 atleast. Anywhere in the .400 territory is usually considered pretty good, and anything of .450 or more is considered very good. Then consider that Barry Bonds had a .609 OBP or so...you realize how insane his season was. That basically means he was on 61% of the time...which is sick.
November 23, 200421 yr He said on-base percentage, not sb percentage, dumbass. Anyways, for a leadoff hitter, .350's usually about as low as I want to go. I'd prefer somewhere around .380, or even more, but I'd like .350 atleast. Anywhere in the .400 territory is usually considered pretty good, and anything of .450 or more is considered very good. Then consider that Barry Bonds had a .609 OBP or so...you realize how insane his season was. That basically means he was on 61% of the time...which is sick. Lol, i fixed it before you posted this so ha.
November 23, 200421 yr See .... that's the hard part about being a GM. If you can't see into the future, you suck. And if you can't jump to the past with your 20-20 hindsite vision and fix things, you also suck.
November 23, 200421 yr Buddy our number 5 positon sucked for how many yrs. Look at the number. Kenny and ozzie are sick of that crap. Go for good starting pitching its time to get number 5 guy settled and get wins. No more losing games cause of it amen
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.