January 19, 200521 yr I would love to have Castillo as our #2 hitter. He can bunt and steal bases. I don't mind that he has no power whatsoever. He is a perfect #1 or #2 hitter. But at the same time, I would hate to give up Marte. I do think that Marte and Willie for Castillo would be a fair trade. I still don't see it happening though.
January 19, 200521 yr This Castillo rumor is heating up folks. Hearing about it from a couple of 'sources'.
January 19, 200521 yr QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 06:01 PM) And Shingo? Or Hermanson, Vizcaino; how will the transfer of leagues effect their statistics? IMO, the priority to upgrade 2B is not a necessity at this point. When mid-year approaches, and the usual bottom feeders are auctioning players, surely a solid 2B/RH utility player can be acquired. Will a pitcher of Marte's stature be available? By the same token, which position would take more talent to acquire midseason, a top 2b or a top set up man? 2B. While upgrading at 2B may be a luxury, what is the backup plan for leadoff if Pods fails, gets hurt etc? Acquiring a leadoff man midseason would cost an arm and a leg. Castillo fill the hole at 2b, and give the Sox a #2 hitter, and leadoff hitter vs LHP [and provides Pods insurance]. Castillo wouldn't just replace Harris. He'd drop Uribe out of the #2 hole [a great thing, he's better down in the order like at 7] as well as be that leadoff backup plan
January 19, 200521 yr This Castillo rumor is heating up folks. Hearing about it from a couple of 'sources'. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Who besides the WhiteSox.com message board?
January 19, 200521 yr Don't underestimate the importance of a deep, solid bullpen. I would absolutely love Castillo, but I'd hate to see Marte go. Damaso is a huge part of this pen, especially since Cotts is the only other LHP (that is unless you consider Kevin Walker part of the team). I know you have to give something to get something, but I don't know that this is a wise investment.
January 19, 200521 yr No, no...and NO. We signed Marte to a 3 year deal for ONLY 4.5M + options for 2007 and 2008. You aren't going to find another pitcher like Marte who will take a contract like that, EVER. That's VERY cheap for someone of Marte's quality, and I say we keep him rather than trading him away and weakening our pitching staff. -y2
January 19, 200521 yr http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/gamelog?statsId=6419 The numbers don't mean much in that win share report, but the rankings defintely have meaning. Take a look at Rollins. Castillo R/RBI gms = 85, Harris projected to 78 full-time, & C Lee was 92 in 04. Led all Sox by 10%. ow look at Rollins: R/RBI gms vs AB Apr 7/71, May 14/107, Jun 19/122, Jul 17/120, Aug 21/114, Sep 20/123 Tot: 98 that's about 7% more than C Lee. He avg'd 33 SB/yr in recent yrs, & he's a capable switch hitter: vs. Left 165AB .303A .365O .473S .837OPS vs. Right 492AB .285A .342O .449S .791OPS He made 2.5M in 04, & is expected to cost less than Castillo in 05. Defensively: .986% 4.01RF .858ZR vs Uribe: .983% 5.29RF .881ZR Castillo: .991% 4.81RF .858ZR Harris: .990% 5.16RF .822ZR RF - is a measure of how many plays a player made in that year ZR - is a measure of how many plays a player made vs other players fielding a similar zone.
January 19, 200521 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 07:20 PM) This Castillo rumor is heating up folks. Hearing about it from a couple of 'sources'. Please share your sources.
January 19, 200521 yr If KW includes Marte in this deal, we're screwed. It won't matter what Castillo does. With no lefty set-up man, the Sox can forget the playoffs.
January 19, 200521 yr QUOTE(WHITESOXRANDY @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 09:07 PM) If KW includes Marte in this deal, we're screwed. It won't matter what Castillo does. With no lefty set-up man, the Sox can forget the playoffs. Someone forgot to tell the Red Sox to get an improvement over Alan Embree and his 4+ ERA. Or the Yanks. Or the Angels. Neal Cotts is better than what these teams have for LH set up Oh, and Welcome to Sox talk
January 19, 200521 yr QUOTE(JUGGERNAUT @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 12:36 PM) Compare Marte's 03 vs 04 appearances & it's really 3 bad gms out of 72 that inflated Marte's ERA in 04. You are acting like practically every other relief pitcher does not have two or three bad innings that inflate their era's. You can't just say that those outings never happened and pretend their era is lower.
January 20, 200521 yr QUOTE(Y2HH @ Jan 19, 2005 -> 02:16 PM) No, no...and NO. We signed Marte to a 3 year deal for ONLY 4.5M + options for 2007 and 2008. You aren't going to find another pitcher like Marte who will take a contract like that, EVER. That's VERY cheap for someone of Marte's quality, and I say we keep him rather than trading him away and weakening our pitching staff. -y2 This is the best argument I've seen to support the "don't trade Marte" point of view. Still, Castillo brings so much to this team that we lack. I don't know if it would be possible to get him without giving up Marte. Honestly, to me this is a very tough call, but I still would have to lean toward getting Castillo if we can.
January 20, 200521 yr You are acting like practically every other relief pitcher does not have two or three bad innings that inflate their era's. You can't just say that those outings never happened and pretend their era is lower. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wrong. I said I could care less about his era. I look at his impact as a reliever on wins & losses. His 59 scoreless appearances is what sells his value to me. Adkins, Herm, & Vizc are wll below that. Not even close. I'm shocked some of you still don't have a picture of what this season is going to be like. We are now Chicago's version of the Twinkies. Gone are Lee & Maggs. On the shelf for a while is Thomas. Gone are the blow out games. The vast majority of games will be hard fought & the Sox will win or lose them with pitching. Not an avalanche of runs. Those days are long forgotten. This bullpen is going to have to protect more 1 & 2 run leads than at any time in recent Sox history. The wins & loses are going to be in their hands. Mostly Marte's & Shingo's. Another way of putting it is that they are just as important to the Sox as Nathan & Romero are to the Twins. They wouldn't do this trade & either should I. I was open to the trade if Vizcaino proves himself early on but then I thought if he does that he'll cost much more than Marte in 06. What's the point? There is a greater likelihood that Marte will finish in the top 10 in NPERA in the AL in 05 than Vizcaino to finish in the top 20. If we lose Marte, & neither Hermanson nor Vizc finish in the top 20 we will lose the division. It's that simple.
January 20, 200521 yr http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n...1534EST0307.DTL Rollins in 05 for 4M. I like that. That's about 1.5M less than Castillo. I wonder what the Phils would want. I don't think we can rule out Polanco either. A 5.1M backup IF doesn't sound practical for the Phils. Especially when the Sox are in need of a starting 2B. Here's a situation where the player can't possibly be happy so the Sox are at better strength in working a trade. If I'm KW I'm on the phone with the Phils over Polanco. Getting him should cost less than Marte.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.