June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Jun 6, 2005 -> 11:48 PM) I would have guardado close over hermanson i. I know no one else will agree with me because '' he has earned it''. But i think it is pretty clear he is pitching way over his head. He might have a flukey year and posts crazy numbers but chances of that happening seem slim to me. With guardado you know what you are getting more or less and i would feel safer with him in big time games. Another reason i can see guardado over hermanson is because we would not have three left handers in middle relief ( cotts, marte, guardado). If we put hermanson as our closer we would have one right hander out of the pen we can rely on ( politte). I agree with you. I think Hermy would make a better setup man.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(qwerty @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 12:48 AM) I would have guardado close over hermanson i. I know no one else will agree with me because '' he has earned it''. But i think it is pretty clear he is pitching way over his head. He might have a flukey year and posts crazy numbers but chances of that happening seem slim to me. With guardado you know what you are getting more or less and i would feel safer with him in big time games. Another reason i can see guardado over hermanson is because we would not have three left handers in middle relief ( cotts, marte, guardado). If we put hermanson as our closer we would have one right hander out of the pen we can rely on ( politte). having 2 lefties in middle relief makes a Guardado trade less likely, and because Hermanson is in fact pitching over his head, there won't be a trade for another closer until he comes back down to earth. Edited June 7, 200520 yr by AirScott
June 7, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 03:57 PM) I agree with you. I think Hermy would make a better setup man. This is how I would have things. Guardado = Closer Politte and Hermanson = Setup men Marte = Use in 7th inning, or in 8th when we need a lefty - lefty matchup. Cotts = Keep him in the 6th and 7th for what he's been doing. Vizcaino and Shingo = Mop up duty until they show they can handle more crucial situations.
June 7, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(AirScott @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 04:02 PM) having 3 lefties in middle relief makes a Guardado trade less likely, and because Hermanson is in fact pitching over his head, there won't be a trade for another closer until he comes back down to earth. Marte and Cotts. I am counting 2 unless you included the almighty Kevin Walker.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 01:03 AM) Marte and Cotts. I am counting 2 unless you included the almighty Kevin Walker. no I meant with Guardado we'd have 3. probably should change it to 2, it makes more sense that way. in fact, consider it done.
June 7, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(AirScott @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 04:04 PM) no I meant with Guardado we'd have 3. probably should change it to 2, it makes more sense that way. in fact, consider it done. I think 3 lefties is fine in the bullpen anyway, especially if you have 7 guys in there. Seattle had like 4 at the start of the season IIRC.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 01:06 AM) I think 3 lefties is fine in the bullpen anyway, especially if you have 7 guys in there. Seattle had like 4 at the start of the season IIRC. yeah but we have more pressing needs, and that's a pitcher too many anyway. I really wish Vizcaino was working out for us, it would make things a lot easier.
June 7, 200520 yr I don't think that Guardado would be handed the closer's job, if acquired. I believe Ozzie would still take the approach of going with his gut instinct or the hot hand, based on matchups.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 01:06 AM) I think 3 lefties is fine in the bullpen anyway, especially if you have 7 guys in there. Seattle had like 4 at the start of the season IIRC. Kinda off topic here, but what does IIRC mean?
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(Dam8610 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 01:49 AM) Kinda off topic here, but what does IIRC mean? IIRC, it means, if I remember correctly.
June 7, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(YASNY @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 04:58 PM) IIRC, it means, if I remember correctly. Yes it does.
June 7, 200520 yr Ok, thanks guys, now I don't have to wonder what you're saying everytime I see that.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(YASNY @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 06:33 AM) I don't think that Guardado would be handed the closer's job, if acquired. I believe Ozzie would still take the approach of going with his gut instinct or the hot hand, based on matchups. I think that would be the best way to go. That way, someone earns the closer spot. Nothing is handed to him. Team chemistry factors in this, where a guy earns respect and the ball in the 9th. Hermanson's earned it now. Eddie's earned it based on his past performances. Yet he would have to realize [if Hermanson was still throwing well at the time of the acquisition] that he wouldn't and shouldn't be guaranteed the ball in the 9th over Dustin. Any guy coming in to a 1st place team needs to adjust their game a little to fit in.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jun 6, 2005 -> 08:35 AM) Did Guillen ever deal with Mota? Wasn't Mota traded to the fish last year in the big deal with the Dodgers that included Brad Penny? I think he meant he would back McKeon over a player, there with Ozzie or not. Mota was in the deal for Penny, but it has nothing to do with Mota, it is about Ozzie's relationship with Jack McKeon.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(SoxAce @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 09:23 AM) God I would love Burroughs. What a friggin stud. Where the f*** have you been? Anyways, I agree atleast a little with qwerty here. If we were to acquire Guardado, I wouldn't want Hermy being the full-time closer, not with just 1 RHP in the bullpen behind him in Politte(unless you count Viz and Shingo in all of their horribleness, and I do not). Shingo also has to use his pitches more effectively. It's not always location...Johan Santana can be locating his pitches poorly, but he knows when to use those pitches. Shingo has been f***ing that up all year.
June 7, 200520 yr QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 05:27 PM) Where the f*** have you been? Anyways, I agree atleast a little with qwerty here. If we were to acquire Guardado, I wouldn't want Hermy being the full-time closer, not with just 1 RHP in the bullpen behind him in Politte(unless you count Viz and Shingo in all of their horribleness, and I do not). Shingo also has to use his pitches more effectively. It's not always location...Johan Santana can be locating his pitches poorly, but he knows when to use those pitches. Shingo has been f***ing that up all year. So you're saying Shingo needs to start playing video games to prepare to pitch?
June 8, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jun 7, 2005 -> 12:02 AM) This is how I would have things. Guardado = Closer Politte and Hermanson = Setup men Marte = Use in 7th inning, or in 8th when we need a lefty - lefty matchup. Cotts = Keep him in the 6th and 7th for what he's been doing. Vizcaino and Shingo = Mop up duty until they show they can handle more crucial situations. I would go with the same.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.