October 26, 200520 yr I can't read the article, but here's the Rotoworld snippet; Sources told the East Valley Tribune that the White Sox are interested in acquiring Diamondbacks infielder Alex Cintron. The paper speculates that the Diamondbacks could get Neal Cotts in return for Cintron, but that's not happening. Even Damaso Marte could be a reach. Cintron is available in trade talks since Arizona no longer sees him as a candidate to play regularly. Oct. 26 - 3:53 am et http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=51473
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 07:57 AM) I can't read the article, but here's the Rotoworld snippet; http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=51473 Trade Cotts? Don't let Steff see this.
October 26, 200520 yr Marte for Cintron huh? Meh, sounds ok, but I woul rather get a better piece. The guy usually kills us though.
October 26, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(RockRaines @ Oct 27, 2005 -> 12:12 AM) Marte for Cintron huh? Meh, sounds ok, but I woul rather get a better piece. The guy usually kills us though. Yeah right team, but the wrong player. Although I think Marte could be used as part of a larger package.
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 10:16 AM) Wouldn't trading for Cintron be a diss to either Uribe or Gooch? Would Cintron be the utility infielder? That's what I thought.
October 26, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Oct 27, 2005 -> 12:16 AM) Wouldn't trading for Cintron be a diss to either Uribe or Gooch? I think Cintron would be used as the major utility guy, which were originally the plans for Uribe when we were going after Vizquel.
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 08:18 AM) Would Cintron be the utility infielder? That's what I thought. Oh. I guess that could be the case.
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 08:18 AM) I think Cintron would be used as the major utility guy, which were originally the plans for Uribe when we were going after Vizquel. OK then. Makes perfect sense now. I'm all for it. As long as we don't have to give up Cotts.
October 26, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Oct 27, 2005 -> 12:19 AM) OK then. Makes perfect sense now. I'm all for it. As long as we don't have to give up Cotts. Neal's definitely going nowhere. Especially if Marte goes, we definitely need at least 1 good lefty out of the pen, and young players like Cotts who are very affordable and post good numbers, are important to hang onto.
October 26, 200520 yr My Bulls*** detectors are going off the charts with this Rotoworld "news" story.
October 26, 200520 yr Maybe the Sox will trade Marte for Overbay...type deal if Konerko doesn't get resigned....
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 08:18 AM) Would Cintron be the utility infielder? That's what I thought. No he wouldn't be, you idiot!
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(Jake @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 10:24 AM) No he wouldn't be, you idiot! Taking the job away from Blum will be harder now than it was before, though
October 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Oct 26, 2005 -> 09:12 AM) Marte for Cintron huh? Meh, sounds ok, but I woul rather get a better piece. The guy usually kills us though. He is one for six in his career against the white sox. Cintron sucks balls. You might as well keep blum ( and i would have said this before the homerun).
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.