Gene Honda Civic Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 No, I'm serious. You're all breaking the law. Hiding behind pseudonyms, creating e-nnoyances. http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%..._3-6022491.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Another example of where a line item veto could have come in handy. Bush signed it because it was with a must pass bill to fund the Justice Department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 QUOTE(EvilMonkey @ Jan 9, 2006 -> 10:47 PM) Another example of where a line item veto could have come in handy. Bush signed it because it was with a must pass bill to fund the Justice Department. I found this post annoying. I'm so calling the feds on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) good thing i never post anything annoying Edited January 10, 2006 by mr_genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 s***, I am in Texas, Sparky in Huntsville must be my fate. . . I know I'd get the death penalty for annoying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jan 10, 2006 -> 08:32 AM) I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh? haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jan 10, 2006 -> 08:32 AM) I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh? Could you link to all my I love DeLay posts? Please Hammer Time 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 My real name is Mr. Eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Wouldn't it be more accurate to title this thread, "Congress declares this forum illegal"? Or maybe "The government declares this forum illegal"? Congress wrote the law and stuck it to something else, and the government as a whole implemented it. Bush's part in signing off on it is worth noting, but I would put the responsibility more on the shoulders of Congress than him. This was not a Bush "thing". I have to side with some of the GOP'ers here who have expressed annoyance with putting all evil in the realm of Bush. It's Congress being stupendously un-tech-savvy, while trying to do something they think is positive, which caused this. Let's try to reserve our criticism of Bush for when he really deserves it (there are plenty of those situations). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 10, 2006 -> 11:00 AM) Wouldn't it be more accurate to title this thread, "Congress declares this forum illegal"? Or maybe "The government declares this forum illegal"? Congress wrote the law and stuck it to something else, and the government as a whole implemented it. Bush's part in signing off on it is worth noting, but I would put the responsibility more on the shoulders of Congress than him. This was not a Bush "thing". I have to side with some of the GOP'ers here who have expressed annoyance with putting all evil in the realm of Bush. It's Congress being stupendously un-tech-savvy, while trying to do something they think is positive, which caused this. Let's try to reserve our criticism of Bush for when he really deserves it (there are plenty of those situations). Republican congress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RibbieRubarb Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 You'll never take me alive coppers!!! :finger ::jumps out window:: Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 QUOTE(RibbieRubarb @ Jan 10, 2006 -> 05:25 PM) You'll never take me alive coppers!!! :finger ::jumps out window:: Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications... This is meant for cyberstalkers. Plus the Senate passed it UNANIMOUSLY. I don't think all of them are Republicans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 QUOTE(G&T @ Jan 10, 2006 -> 07:06 PM) This is meant for cyberstalkers. Plus the Senate passed it UNANIMOUSLY. I don't think all of them are Republicans. No, but I'll bet Bush had the Democrat ones under a spell or something. That has to be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 See my sig. That's about all I have to say about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts