No, I'm serious. You're all breaking the law. Hiding behind pseudonyms, creating e-nnoyances.

 

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%..._3-6022491.html

Another example of where a line item veto could have come in handy. Bush signed it because it was with a must pass bill to fund the Justice Department.

Another example of where a line item veto could have come in handy.  Bush signed it because it was with a must pass bill to fund the Justice Department.

I found this post annoying. I'm so calling the feds on you.

good thing i never post anything annoying

Edited January 10, 200620 yr by mr_genius

s***, I am in Texas, Sparky in Huntsville must be my fate. . . I know I'd get the death penalty for annoying

I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh?

I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh?

 

 

haha

I guess this is time for me to cut a deal and send my pal GW all of the liberals IP information, huh?

 

Could you link to all my I love DeLay posts? Please

 

Hammer Time 2008

 

 

My real name is Mr. Eye.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to title this thread, "Congress declares this forum illegal"? Or maybe "The government declares this forum illegal"? Congress wrote the law and stuck it to something else, and the government as a whole implemented it. Bush's part in signing off on it is worth noting, but I would put the responsibility more on the shoulders of Congress than him.

 

This was not a Bush "thing". I have to side with some of the GOP'ers here who have expressed annoyance with putting all evil in the realm of Bush. It's Congress being stupendously un-tech-savvy, while trying to do something they think is positive, which caused this. Let's try to reserve our criticism of Bush for when he really deserves it (there are plenty of those situations).

Wouldn't it be more accurate to title this thread, "Congress declares this forum illegal"?  Or maybe "The government declares this forum illegal"?  Congress wrote the law and stuck it to something else, and the government as a whole implemented it.  Bush's part in signing off on it is worth noting, but I would put the responsibility more on the shoulders of Congress than him.

 

This was not a Bush "thing".  I have to side with some of the GOP'ers here who have expressed annoyance with putting all evil in the realm of Bush.  It's Congress being stupendously un-tech-savvy, while trying to do something they think is positive, which caused this.  Let's try to reserve our criticism of Bush for when he really deserves it (there are plenty of those situations).

 

Republican congress.

You'll never take me alive coppers!!! :finger

 

::jumps out window::

 

 

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

You'll never take me alive coppers!!! :finger

 

::jumps out window::

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...

 

This is meant for cyberstalkers.

Plus the Senate passed it UNANIMOUSLY. I don't think all of them are Republicans.

This is meant for cyberstalkers.

Plus the Senate passed it UNANIMOUSLY. I don't think all of them are Republicans.

No, but I'll bet Bush had the Democrat ones under a spell or something. That has to be it.

See my sig. That's about all I have to say about that.