It's going to be fun watching our offense hit against Sabathia tomorrow.

 

Could someone explain what "ball 4, base hit" means again?

 

Basically, Hawk means ball 4 "or" base hit. He's saving words I guess.

It's going to be fun watching our offense hit against Sabathia tomorrow.

 

Could someone explain what "ball 4, base hit" means again?

 

Isn't it self explanatory? He wants the guy to reach base via walk or hit.

One time Paulie. Lets take the lead now and give the ball to Bobby.

 

Brian Anderson deserves to be in the big leagues.

 

 

I cannot defend my arguments without visual aids.

Yeah sure, whatever you say.

 

You know you said Thornton was a better matchup, when in fact you never thought that a good offspeed pitch vs. Hafner is what's needed.

 

You really need to stop all your 2nd guessing when you really don't know.

 

I never said s*** about the offspeed pitch. I think Thornton has a terrible offspeed pitch. However, I thought he had enough velocity to be able to throw it by Hafner upstairs. When it comes to our bullpen, lets just be happy they got a guy out. I'm not blaming this on Ozzie in any shape or form though. This team just isn't good right now besides Dye and Jenks.

 

I cannot defend my arguments without visual aids.

 

Well done.

 

I cannot defend my arguments without visual aids.

 

 

Gotta give credit

 

Man, do we have low expectations for our pitchers this year. Vazquez gave up like 50 runners in this game. He pitched with balls...but he had his work cut out for him.

 

I only have low expectations for Garland, although I've only got mild expectations of Garcia.

 

It was the fact that Vazquez pitched through his hit batsmen and all the runners that I was proud of him. But I am somewhat biased, as he and Contreras are my personal favorites.

 

I cannot defend my arguments without visual aids.

 

Nice ass!

Isn't it self explanatory? He wants the guy to reach base via walk or hit.

 

Or it could be interpreted ball 4 with the present hitter, then basehit by the ondeck hitter. So no, I don't think it is self explanatory.

yup... betancourt owns us

No PR for Thome?

Or it could be interpreted ball 4 with the present hitter, then basehit by the ondeck hitter. So no, I don't think it is self explanatory.

No. It could not be interpreted as that unless you just started following baseball this week.

Mother of mercy, please give JD another homer!!!

No PR for Thome?

That just cost us a run.

pk doubles... second and third... two outs

I'm shocked that Cora didn't send Thome. Not because he should have, but because it's Cora.

Mother of mercy, please give JD another homer!!!

 

I'll take a single to right center

Mother of mercy, please give JD another homer!!!

 

I'd take a blooper. We are due a blooper.

I'm shocked that Cora didn't send Thome. Not because he should have, but because it's Cora.

 

good post

Come on Jermaine.

 

If you don't do it here, the game is probably over because, I don't know if you've been told, but our next part of the lineup blows.

So right now we have PK and Dye, and then 7 other stiffs....well, Thome at least keeps his OBP up, can't fault him there.

QUOTE(Capn12 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 10:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

A .254 hitting leadoff hitter that plays asstastic defense...go us.

 

"But its ok, he can steal bases!!!"

His OBP is fine for a leadoff hitter.

 

I have never understood your gripe against Pods.

We need a hit. A walk would leave it to AJ and his miniscule average with RISP.

cincher up, etc.