July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:05 PM) Not the first time I've made a mistake, and definitely not the last. So sorry... I think it's the first time you've ever made a mistake.
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:05 PM) Not the first time I've made a mistake, and definitely not the last. So sorry... I don't blame you, Steff. It's just that the "alternative" spelling kept getting perpetuated in subsequent posts.... (That, and no one got my Justin Speier reference)
July 27, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 03:07 PM) I think it's the first time you've ever made a mistake. That's because I usually hide them much better...
July 27, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Balance @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 03:08 PM) I don't blame you, Steff. It's just that the "alternative" spelling kept getting perpetuated in subsequent posts.... (That, and no one got my Justin Speier reference) I should have just said the "Chicago Vibrator"
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:10 PM) That's because I usually hide them much better...
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:11 PM) I should have just said the "Chicago Vibrator" You thought of that too? My, how many sick people we have on this Earth...! Am I the only one pure and noble of heart and soul? So alone. So alone. So alone.
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:11 PM) I should have just said the "Chicago Vibrator" That sounds like a finalist from the "name the Chicago WNBA franchise" contest.
July 27, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 03:12 PM) You thought of that too? My, how many sick people we have on this Earth...! Am I the only one pure and noble of heart and soul? So alone. So alone. So alone. No.. my thought was something worse..
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 04:13 PM) No.. my thought was something worse.. My friend had the same thought, but I thought, for these purposes, "Vibrator" was about the same.
July 27, 200718 yr Wikipedia says there's a debate over what constitutes a vibrator and what constitutes...something else... Are we allowed to use....the....D....word....?
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 02:12 PM) Ugly. I'd rather let other cities build all the spacey looking stuff and just have my classic Chicago skyline. ^^^^^^^^^
July 27, 200718 yr Author QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 03:19 PM) Wikipedia says there's a debate over what constitutes a vibrator and what constitutes...something else... Are we allowed to use....the....D....word....? You are obviously not busy enough at work.
July 27, 200718 yr we will have a land mark that looks like a vibrator and one that looks like a bean Chicago rules
July 27, 200718 yr QUOTE(mr_genius @ Jul 27, 2007 -> 05:59 PM) we will have a land mark that looks like a vibrator and one that looks like a bean Chicago rules Meat and One Veg? Actually, I kinda like the bean. It doesn't mess up the skyline and it is a fitting anchor for the Art Institute end of Grant Park. Jaded as I am about the Soldier Field renovation and the pending Vibrator, I admit that I really thunk they did a great job with Millenium Park.
July 29, 200718 yr I think I must be alone when I say I can't wait to see how the skyline looks with the new building. People don't like change at all, and that is evident when you think back to all of the major changes that have happened in Chicago, and all of the b****ing that went with them. Now nobody really remembers that, and instead is in awe of what we have. I am sure the Spire will be the sameway.
July 29, 200718 yr People seem to be forgetting the new Trump Tower skyscraper being built too. I personally can't wait to see the skyline when both buildings are completed.
July 29, 200718 yr QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 29, 2007 -> 03:18 AM) People seem to be forgetting the new Trump Tower skyscraper being built too. I personally can't wait to see the skyline when both buildings are completed. Any schematics of that one? Where is it going?
July 29, 200718 yr QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jul 28, 2007 -> 11:40 PM) Any schematics of that one? Where is it going? I havent seen a model but its being built where The Sun-Times offices used to be on the Chicago River.
July 29, 200718 yr QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jul 28, 2007 -> 10:40 PM) Any schematics of that one? Where is it going? Like Rex said, right where the old Sun Times building was. 401 North Wabash. I'd say about 1/3 is completed.
July 29, 200718 yr QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 29, 2007 -> 02:08 AM) Like Rex said, right where the old Sun Times building was. 401 North Wabash. I'd say about 1/3 is completed. I like the way that one looks a lot more than the Spire. That one looks like it will fit its surroundings, even as large as it is.
July 29, 200718 yr I think the Trump one looks much better. Different, yet also fits in with the surroundings.
July 29, 200718 yr QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jul 28, 2007 -> 10:40 PM) Any schematics of that one? Where is it going? QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 29, 2007 -> 01:08 AM) Like Rex said, right where the old Sun Times building was. 401 North Wabash. I'd say about 1/3 is completed. QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jul 29, 2007 -> 07:56 AM) Ah, ok. Between the two, it will definitely change the skyline. The two buildings will really "fill in" the skyline we have today. I always kind of think of Chicago's current look with the Sears Tower and Hancock as bookends, and the rest of the city fitting in between. Trump will fall pretty well into the middle of the traditional Adler Planatarium portrait view. I think the Spire will be right on the end. It ought to look pretty sharp.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.