April 25, 200817 yr how many wins all-time do the White Sox have? Is the Cub's 10,000 wins a lot compared to other franchises?
April 25, 200817 yr "At of the start of play on July 21, 2007 the Chicago White Sox all time won loss record was 8343-8144." I could be wrong, but I'm guessing the Cubs record predates MLB(1901), when technically they were the White Stockings.
April 25, 200817 yr Here's a link to a page on baseballreference.com that lists MLB teams and their all-time records. http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/
April 25, 200817 yr interesting the Cubs are the lovable losers even though they have a .514 winning percentage.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (WilliamTell @ Apr 25, 2008 -> 01:29 AM) interesting the Cubs are the lovable losers even though they have a .514 winning percentage. also, they're not lovable. the double whammy of fallacies.
April 25, 200817 yr The franchise which became the Cubs had a 25 year head start on the Sox. The National League started in 1876.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (WilliamTell @ Apr 24, 2008 -> 10:29 PM) interesting the Cubs are the lovable losers even though they have a .514 winning percentage. I heard an interesting trivia bit... The Cubs are the only MLB tream to never have had a losing record for their whole history.
April 25, 200817 yr interesting the Cubs are the lovable losers even though they have a .514 winning percentage. they also have 16 pennants and a pathetic 2 World Series Championships. Could be why they are dubbed LOSERS.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 25, 2008 -> 05:58 AM) I heard an interesting trivia bit... The Cubs are the only MLB tream to never have had a losing record for their whole history. either you forgot the green, or that is wrong.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (rangercal @ Apr 25, 2008 -> 12:26 PM) either you forgot the green, or that is wrong. I believe he means that the Cubs franchise itself has never been below .500 ever at any point in time over the course of its history. Cubs franchise history...they f***ing dominated in the 1870s and 1880s.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 25, 2008 -> 12:31 PM) I believe he means that the Cubs franchise itself has never been below .500 ever at any point in time over the course of its history. Cubs franchise history...they f***ing dominated in the 1870s and 1880s. I see, That makes sense.
April 25, 200817 yr QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 25, 2008 -> 12:31 PM) I believe he means that the Cubs franchise itself has never been below .500 ever at any point in time over the course of its history. Cubs franchise history...they f***ing dominated in the 1870s and 1880s. Yes, that is what I meant, thanks for saying it much more clearly.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.