July 31, 200817 yr I'll take another young pitcher. The Sox staff could compare to Tampa Bay in the whole age/quality thing if they keep it up.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 12:32 PM) Well now I know it is BS. Jessie Rogers sourcesare about as good as mine. I miss Steff on days like today. Whatever happened to her? She seemed to drop off the planet for some reason.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (Pants Rowland @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 01:08 PM) Whatever happened to her? She seemed to drop off the planet for some reason. She can't stand those pants.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (Pants Rowland @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 02:08 PM) Whatever happened to her? She seemed to drop off the planet for some reason. I wondered what happened to her too.
July 31, 200817 yr Steff's a lot busier than she used to be, doesn't have as much time to spend on the boards, as a lot of us don't anymore either unfortunately.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (DBAH0 @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 01:16 PM) Steff's a lot busier than she used to be, doesn't have as much time to spend on the boards, as a lot of us don't anymore either unfortunately. She was banned for her language following the blow-up doll incident. Oh wait, that was me.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 01:09 PM) She can't stand those pants. Really?! I wish she would have said something. I would have gladly taken them off for her.
July 31, 200817 yr Per Roto World: According to Nationals writer Bill Ladson, Washington is discussing Joel Hanrahan, not John Lannan, with the White Sox. That makes a lot more sense. The White Sox would prefer a reliever anyway, and Lannan is someone the Nationals look at as a building block. Hanrahan won't come cheap, either, but he is a more realistic target. That's too bad, cause I really wanted Lannan.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (Cowch @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 02:33 PM) Per Roto World: According to Nationals writer Bill Ladson, Washington is discussing Joel Hanrahan, not John Lannan, with the White Sox. That makes a lot more sense. The White Sox would prefer a reliever anyway, and Lannan is someone the Nationals look at as a building block. Hanrahan won't come cheap, either, but he is a more realistic target. That's too bad, cause I really wanted Lannan. They better hurry.
July 31, 200817 yr They're talkin Lannan up as an NL rookie of the year candidate in Washington. Unless they were getting Fields back, I couldn't see the need for the Nats to do it.
July 31, 200817 yr QUOTE (DBAH0 @ Jul 31, 2008 -> 02:45 PM) They're talkin Lannan up as an NL rookie of the year candidate in Washington. Unless they were getting Fields back, I couldn't see the need for the Nats to do it. Hell we should have asked for Ross Detwiler
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.