Texas marriages in legal limbo due to 2005 error, Democrat says

Texans: Are you really married?

 

Maybe not.

 

Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a Houston lawyer and Democratic candidate for attorney general, says that a 22-word clause in a 2005 constitutional amendment designed to ban gay marriages erroneously endangers the legal status of all marriages in the state.

 

The amendment, approved by the Texas Legislature and overwhelmingly ratified by Texas voters, declares that "marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman." But the trouble-making phrase, as Radnofsky sees it, is Subsection B, which declares:

 

"This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage."

 

Architects of the amendment included the clause to ban same-sex civil unions and domestic partnerships.

 

But Radnofsky, who was a member of the powerhouse Vinson & Elkins law firm in Houston for 27 years until retiring in 2006, says the wording of Subsection B effectively "eliminates marriage in Texas," including common-law marriages.

 

She calls it a "massive mistake" and blames the current attorney general, Republican Greg Abbott, for allowing the language to become part of the Texas Constitution. Radnofsky called on Abbott to acknowledge the wording as an error and consider an apology. She also said that another constitutional amendment may be necessary to reverse the problem.

 

"You do not have to have a fancy law degree to read this and understand what it plainly says," said Radnofsky, who will be at Texas Christian University on Wednesday as part of a five-city tour to kick off her campaign.

 

-more at the link-

Edited November 20, 200916 yr by Athomeboy_2000

that's pretty hilarious actually.

Cool! I'm going to go kick Mrs. Kap out of the damn house right now.

Cool! I'm going to go kick Mrs. Kap out of the damn house right now.

 

[cut to Kap in his underwear on the front lawn scratching his head puzzled]

 

Ah, I've been there, done that Damn, there was a cheaper option?!

She's not going for it so far. Where did I go wrong?

 

so technically, Texas also eliminated adultery . . .

She's not going for it so far. Where did I go wrong?

 

Marrying someone with an IQ over 70?

Perhaps we should look at it as Straight marriage purposely banned Texas.