Are you serious?

yup. I think he's overrated, overpaid and declining. He gives up goals by the bunches. I detest Seabrook.

Montador is still due 2.75 mil a year til 2015. If he can come back healthy and not suck at hockey, that would be huge. It would make it easier to deal with a trade of #2 or #7.

Niklas Hjalmarsson could be traded. Maybe Stalberg.

 

 

I don't see guys like Keith, Seabrook or Kane getting traded. Unless you are planing on completely rebuilding. Why you would trade those 3 guys is beyond me.

Hawks can't get a RFA this summer due to not enough draft picks. (from the Oduya deal) Schneider would be amazing, but Hawks have to go to the UFA route. Perhaps a guy like Montoya if they trade Crawford.

I thought the Oduya picks were next year and not 2012.

 

I'd drive Seabrook to the f***ing airport myself if they could unload him.

Whoa, can't disagree more. He was our best defenseman by a mile this year.

 

I'd say the 3 names who are most in danger of being traded are Sharp, Hjalmarsson and Stalberg.

I'd say the 3 names who are most in danger of being traded are Sharp, Hjalmarsson and Stalberg.

 

I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw?

I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw?

 

It would be tough to trade Kane. You'd have to get a top 5 goalie.

I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw?

Repeated giveaways every game I watched. Keith had some as well but overall he was much better than Seabrook was all season. I would gladly remove him from the lineup as well as his salary for what he brings to the team.

Repeated giveaways every game I watched. Keith had some as well but overall he was much better than Seabrook was all season. I would gladly remove him from the lineup as well as his salary for what he brings to the team.

I don't think is nearly the player he was 2 years ago. He has looked pretty shaky recently. I thought Seabs actually played pretty well this year, especially in the playoffs.

Peverly has had a short fuse this year. And he's been a whiny b****.

He didn't actually touch him.

He didn't actually touch him.

 

Yeah, that makes Holtby's reaction even better.

Gotcha. If others didn't see it on different angles, you'd think he got him.

yup. I think he's overrated, overpaid and declining. He gives up goals by the bunches. I detest Seabrook.

 

I agree.

I agree.

I like you. I may even give you a nickname.

Game 7s FTW

I like you. I may even give you a nickname.

 

The highest of all high honors! (Pun thoroughly intended.)

Not sure where else to put this but

 

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/hoc...19bb2963f4.html

 

Wisconsin v. Minnesota at Soldier Field next year.

Not sure where else to put this but

 

http://host.madison.com/sports/college/hoc...19bb2963f4.html

 

Wisconsin v. Minnesota at Soldier Field next year.

 

That's the undercard. Miami vs. Notre Dame is the main event

Im not sure if anyone is being considered an "undercard". I can really only find information on Wisconsin- Minnesota (as that conceivably is the bigger game as its between 2 teams who have 11 NCAA championships between them).

 

Supposedly Wisconsin is getting paid between $200-$250k to come (Wisconsin has one of the largest hockey stadiums of any NCAA team, Kohl Center holds 15,325) where as Notre Dame can only hold 5,000, Ohio 2,850 and Minnesota 9,305.

 

From all accounts they are relying on a large Wisconsin turn out because Wisconsin sells out 15k and its replacing a home Wisconsin game (hence the payment to Wisconsin).

 

Im sure that as its Chicago there will be a good amount of ND fans, ND hockey just isnt really comparable to Wisconsin though. I guess Im just not sure if the noon game or the late game is the "undercard".

Im not sure if anyone is being considered an "undercard". I can really only find information on Wisconsin- Minnesota (as that conceivably is the bigger game as its between 2 teams who have 11 NCAA championships between them).

 

Supposedly Wisconsin is getting paid between $200-$250k to come (Wisconsin has one of the largest hockey stadiums of any NCAA team, Kohl Center holds 15,325) where as Notre Dame can only hold 5,000, Ohio 2,850 and Minnesota 9,305.

 

From all accounts they are relying on a large Wisconsin turn out because Wisconsin sells out 15k and its replacing a home Wisconsin game (hence the payment to Wisconsin).

 

Im sure that as its Chicago there will be a good amount of ND fans, ND hockey just isnt really comparable to Wisconsin though. I guess Im just not sure if the noon game or the late game is the "undercard".

 

I was just giving you a hard time for slighting the other game. That being said, since 2007, Miami & Notre Dame have been much more successful than Wisco or Minny.

Yeah I could have mentioned both, I just was lazy.

 

 

Yay, Kings

Good to see that the real Brian Elliott finally showed up for STL. Go Kings.

Mmmm...Kings/Yotes. That sounds...horrible.