September 5, 201213 yr Honestly, Quintana was a blessing when Danks went down, but he's up 60 innings from last year and appears to have hit a wall. Santiago is a stronger option down the stretch IMO. I think the decision is obvious, but I doubt we see the change. Thoughts?
September 5, 201213 yr Daryl Van Schouwen @CST_soxvan Quintana doesn't look fatigued to Sox staff. Just dealing with control problems, Ventura said.
September 5, 201213 yr QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 06:51 AM) Honestly, Quintana was a blessing when Danks went down, but he's up 60 innings from last year and appears to have hit a wall. Santiago is a stronger option down the stretch IMO. I think the decision is obvious, but I doubt we see the change. Thoughts? I'm shocked your idea came up after a bad start.
September 5, 201213 yr Author QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 03:43 PM) I'm shocked your idea came up after a bad start. I'm shocked you added nothing but your typical meatball nonsense. Two straight AWFUL starts and a 1.57 WHIP in August means nothing I guess. Nor does the significant jump in innings pitched this year.
September 5, 201213 yr Sox have to do this; Q is Humber-like right now. Unless it's something that can be fixed, Q needs an extended time on the bench.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.