October 21, 201510 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 20, 2015 -> 07:02 AM) No, they don't. The Cubs coverage is always greater, because they are the greater media product. But per fan interest, there's a reasonable amount of coverage for each when they're both good. This isn't 1993. The Sox have broken the WS drought.
October 21, 201510 yr QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Oct 20, 2015 -> 10:49 PM) But per fan interest, there's a reasonable amount of coverage for each when they're both good. This isn't 1993. The Sox have broken the WS drought. That isn't really true. Even in 2012 when the Cubs were terrible and the Sox were in first place most of the year the coverage was not what you would have expected. The Cubs will continue to get favorable coverage barring a dynastic-type run from the Sox.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.