MurcieOne

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 09:21 PM) http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/sub/mockdraft.html They have Leinart going 1, so I don't know what to think................. Thats weird.... Kiper doesnt even have Lienart in his top Qb's Kiper I dunno.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 09:10 PM) I think its apparent that the Bears need to trade down. The top 4 picks will be between the two qb's (Leinart and Rogers), Antrelle Rolle, and Cedric Benson none of which fit the Bears drastic needs. Lienart isnt listed as one of the drafts top 5 Qb's he's believed to be a Ken Dorsey of sorts... not really NFL quality.... I disagree, but then again.. I do love Matt Leinart and want to have a love child with him soooo

QUOTE(Man Of Steel @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 06:37 PM) Yup and they need a big play WR.. Mike Williams, Braylon Edwards, or Mark Clayton.. One of those guys would be a very good pick for them.. They need to give Grossman a weapon.. Read my sig MoS...... Rex already has a weapon!

I like the list WS61382...... but i gotta disagree with the Mets at #2.... I would definitely put the mets on the bottom 5 of that list behind the Yanks Cubs Redsox Cards and Marlins.

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 06:26 PM) Wow, looks good, Bears at 4..... This is whats gonna happen.... were gonna take Mike Williams and he's gonna go to the HOF in the year 2019. Book it!

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 05:14 PM) If they take Williams, I won't mind if they cut DT loose. But I don't see anyone ready to step in and take that starters' job from Terrell -- Gage is nowhere near ready (hell, how a team cannot get a guy who can jump that high is beyond me), and while Berrian is close (should be the #3 next season), he's not ready. Wade is a nice guy to have around, too, but he's not your number one. He's the possession guy, good hands, doesn't run extremely fast/jump very high, but he's a very nice number two/number three. That being said.... DT is ok.... But consider the fact of all the penalties he got flagged for and all the extra curricular s*** that we dont need to worry about... time to cut this puppy loose.

95-96 Bulls: Going on a Tear = 72 wins + 4th title in 6 years 04-05 Bulls: Going on a Tear = 5 game win streak 10-17 record eh... I still love Kirk Ben and Zulu Deng

Here's hoping Pennington can make em pay

why what did he do

So Vikings are in..... and the Saints are in if the Rams lose?

Here's Hoping that Delhomme can pull another rabbit outta his ass!

QUOTE(chimpy2121 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:18 PM) What the hell was with Moss leaving the field before the game was over. It was over in a sense but what an asshole leaving the field by yourself when the games not even over. That act of poor sportsmanship pretty much sums up Randy Moss....

What scenario gets them in?

I actually came on soxtalk looking for a thread like this.... this is why i love it here. They can still get in though....

I'm actually pretty happy Rex got injured early in the season, if he had to go through this s***ty protection for an entire year... it woulda killed his confidence.

QUOTE(Texsox @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 02:59 PM) Do you think we need to get a closer in before a DH gets in? Isnt Eckersly get in last year?

Im kinda upset i never got to play....

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 01:38 PM) I think billy's making a huge mistake here. I'm willing to bet that bmac turns out better then Haren, I'm not that high on Danny, I think he's a bit overrated. how good are the kids that beane got for Mulder and Hudson?

Well, we shall see if Billy Beane is the genious he certainly believes he is.... he taking a big ass gamble.

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 01:17 PM) i just hope if KW has to choose between the two he picks AJ because our C is a much bigger hole than 2B.... and in a way i wouldnt mind Willie get his first real chance to hold the spot. Kenny offered that Japanese guy 2mil, he was looking for 7.... i think its safe to say he's not coming to the SouthSide...

QUOTE(TheBlackSox8 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 01:03 PM) what happened to the soxtalk header with the new aquisitions?? This looks f***ing tiooooght.... except no header but tioooght otherwise

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:58 AM) <!--QuoteBegin-Jeckle2000+Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:48 AM--> QUOTE (Jeckle2000 @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:48 AM) <!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Cleats67+Jan 1, 2005 -> 09:30 PM--> QUOTE (Cleats67 @ Jan 1, 2005 -> 09:30 PM) <!--QuoteEBegin--> This is no different than when the Bulls brought in Dennis Rodman. He was hated by everyone on the Bulls when he was with the Pistons. The Bulls talked with Michael, Scottie,... and then agreed to sign him. Even though he caused a lot of chaos while here, they won 3 championships with him. AJ is the same type of player Rodman was. He gets in the head of the opponent and takes them out of their game. We need some character, heart, and passion on this team and he will give us that and it will spill over to other Sox players. We won't have anyone being plowed over at the plate without getting drilled the next time up if AJ is here. The difference is that the bulls would of won those Championships with or without Rodman. The bulls were already in a position to win it all. Rodman was just the icing on the cake. It is highly unlikely this team in it's current state is going to win the World Series. Will adding AJ make us that team? Maybe... However to compare us to the Bulls signing Rodman just doesn't make much sense. No way the bulls would have won those championships without Rodman. we all love the worm, but you could swap any number of solid rebounders with Dennis, and the bulls still wouda won. wouldnt have been as fun to watch, but still wouda been fine. Same with Longley and Harper.

QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:47 AM) Murcie, you may want to edit "Your just jealous" to "You're just jealous" before anyone (besides myself) notices. Grammar police can be brutal. I actually did notice that at first and then i was like..... im making a sig about rex grossmans ding dong.... does grammar really matter... i decided not.

QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Jan 2, 2005 -> 03:47 AM) Murcie, you may want to edit "Your just jealous" to "You're just jealous" before anyone (besides myself) notices. Grammar police can be brutal. I dont care