qwerty

Willie with the lead-off walk.

Wo0t.....

Burnitz takes second on the botched hit and run. Ramirez k's one down.

QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 03:31 PM) Poor approach by the hitters today with that 69 pitches after 6 innings stat. The guy is obviously on a pitch count and they aren't working him it sounds like. Granted he can be tough but it sounds like their heads are not in the game. Time for a wake up call here. He is not on a pitch count. All depends on how he feels.

Konerko lets a ball deflect off of him... man on first no outs.

What we truly need is a bloop and a blast. Doubtful we are gonna score off of prior using ''small ball'' or ''smart ball'... whatever it is called this week.

Nice job running that out podsednik. Ball deflects off prior to walker for the easy out ( should have been closer at first).

Crede grounds out to ramirez, ozuna flies out to center.

Game over? 1-0 on a patterson homer.

Blanco k's... one down for patterson.

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 03:18 PM) Like I already said, it just pisses me off. It's caught 95 percent of the time he says it, and it just seems to make worse the fact that someone just missed a homer. He is senile what can you expect.

Thebighurt ( the poster) is insane. Just felt like i would throw that out there.

Prior just won't walk anyone. Dye flies out to center after being ahead 3-0.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 03:10 PM) I think the Cubs would have been on the board, if it got through. For sure, they were running on contact.

QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 03:08 PM) Description please? Ozuna dove straight up the middle and tossed it to willie, willie had to stretch to beat the play out in time

That is the same pitch hollandsworth homered on in the opener.

Barret walks, first and second two outs for hollandsworth.

QUOTE(TheBigHurt @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 02:50 PM) What I'm saying is the fact he's been mediocre in the past doesn't mean he's not gonna get better. In fact u implying that shows a great lack of common sense. Either that, or ignorance. Or hell, even bitterness. Take your pick. None of the above. You have a hard on for garland and that is cool... i do not. How about he proves himself as an ace for more than 3 months before we annoint him one (you)? If people went by just three months or even a full years worth of stats that would be pretty retarded, to say the least. I will come back in this thread when there is some better discussion. Like something that doesn't suggest garland is the second coming.

Konerko k's on a ball in the dirt, inning over.

QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 02:55 PM) I'm just talking the past few years when he's been less than stellar (i.e. his recent stint with the Yankees) .280, .367, .396, and .765 wasn't that bad.

Jim, you watching the game today?

Frank k's, two down.

QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 02:51 PM) He's the Jon Olerud of the hot corner -- not a great offensive bat but a great glove that you want. The same olerud that has a career obp of .399?

Willie flies out to left.

QUOTE(TheBigHurt @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 02:46 PM) Past statistics are not relevant to the future. Possibly the most asinine thing i have ever heard.