Everything posted by fathom
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(TitoMB345 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 01:07 AM) From a homer by AJ. Ya, I'm well aware that you were referring to the AJP hit. I'm just stunned by your measuring estimation.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
That was the same location of the Thome K.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(TitoMB345 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 01:04 AM) DUDE! OMG! NO WAY! 1 foot 1 foot???
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
That was pretty close for AJP. Good ABs by Crede and AJP.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
Kansas City A's?
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(jphat007 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 01:00 AM) I wouldn't mind Dye trying to steal now. He's have to guess perfectly. With Santana's move and Mauer's arm, it's a tough combo.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(TitoMB345 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 12:57 AM) Orton went to Purdue, my college!! Woo, I hate the Bears though. Pack fan for life. It's ok...most Bears fans hate Purdue for giving us Orton.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
Am I allowed to root for Johan to break his wrist?
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(TitoMB345 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 12:50 AM) How so? Santana doesn't even have to hit the zone to get a K now. I dont see the logic, especially since Buehrle is pretty accurate. Santana doesn't need to hit the corners to be effective. Buehrle, on the other hand, takes advantage of a wide corner often with his pitches.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
Iguchi's defense has been much improved this season.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(TitoMB345 @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 12:48 AM) Well, with Santana getting bulls*** called strikes, I have a feeling we're in for a LONG night. That pitch was so far outside, I can't even believe the ump considering calling that. A big strike zone favors the Sox tonight.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
QUOTE(ottawa_sox @ Apr 22, 2006 -> 12:48 AM) Amazing to see him struggle against other teams. Whenever I see other teams hit him hard, they always jump all over his curve/slider.
-
Game Thread: Sox vs Twinkies 4-21-06
New year, same story vs Santana.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
QUOTE(DannyCooksey @ Apr 21, 2006 -> 03:12 AM) Cub Fan Here Just wanted to throw my two cents in here. I am not saying it's everyone on this board, but for those that have made their snide comments and laughed at a man's misfortune. How sick are you people??? I have read this board occasionally and while I realize you guys are still 40/60 Cub-Haters and therefore not actual White Sox fans (the 40, not the 60 for clarification) how can you laugh and mock celebrate a man's injury and a team's atrocious misfortune??? Are you people that demented and sick in the head that you would do that??? Most of the Cubs injuries have been caused by awful managing by Dusty and terrible mechanics. We're talking about a wrist injury to D. Lee....not a spinal cord injury. It's funny, but I didn't see many posts from Cubs fans the last few years when the best player in Sox franchise history missed extended periods of time.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
QUOTE(DannyCooksey @ Apr 21, 2006 -> 03:12 AM) Cub Fan Here The only question is..........which one of the three are you??? I'm number 4....someone who feels bad for anyone who would waste their time writing such a long post. Go back to your Bud Light Bleachers....I have a 2005 World Series DVD to watch.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
Watch for the Cubs to trade for Tony Clark.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
Knowing Dusty, he'll just move Walker to 1B, and he can play Neifi at 2B now.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Apr 20, 2006 -> 11:38 PM) I hear this great sobbing noise coming from the direction of Wrigleyville. Strange. Are you sure it's not cause "Will and Grace" is going off the air after this season?
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
Maybe they can make a trade for Carlos Pena now? Maybe my vision was skewed with the wrong Chicago team?
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
QUOTE(maggsmaggs @ Apr 20, 2006 -> 11:04 PM) I should say Comcast Sports Net says "could" be 8-10 weeks. Typical Cub organization crap. Not to be an ass, but would it have been that hard to put that in the title of this thread? Thanks for the report though.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
The Cubs board heard the same story from Comcast.
-
Derrek Lee Possibly Out 8-10 weeks
That means we'll likely miss him both times we play him. I won't shed a tear about that.
-
Sox Should Make Signing Buehrle Top Priority
QUOTE(aboz56 @ Apr 20, 2006 -> 10:16 PM) The Red Sox are best served to make sure blister gate doesn't happen again this year before tendering a long term deal to Beckett. And I don't think he's worth as much as Mark is as far as a contract goes, but Boston will most likely overpay to keep him. Yeah, I highly doubt any GM would give Beckett more money than Buehrle.
-
Sox Should Make Signing Buehrle Top Priority
QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 20, 2006 -> 09:19 PM) Just like KW said that negotiations broke off with both of them. KW lies well enough to apply for the White House Press Secretary job. He had no reason to lie after they signed though. It wasn't like he was using that for negotiations. I didn't think it was a secret that Garland/Contreras were on the market this offseason.
-
Sox Should Make Signing Buehrle Top Priority
QUOTE(WCSox @ Apr 20, 2006 -> 08:54 PM) Did KW actually come out and say that or was it just a rumor? Even if that information is true, Garland finally had ONE good year after five very mediocre ones. Contreras is at least 34 (possibly as old as 36) and had not been as consistent as expected in his major league career. Neither of those guys have as much long-term upside as Buehrle and, therefore, are not as important to the team's long-term goals. Yes, after Contrereas re-signed, KW said something about how those guys have no clue how close they were to getting traded.