In another example of change we can believe in, the Obama administration today followed a court order requiring that several of the memos the Bush Administration used to justify their torture regime be released. The only things they redacted were the names of the people in the CIA who had done the torture, as far as we can guess. They did say that the people who actually did the torturing will be granted immunity, but notably, they did not say that same thing about the people who ordered it done.
A lot of them go through specifically the techniques, like keeping a guy conscious for 11 days, etc., that we were declaring legal. It's somewhat sterile but equally mind-boggling that people actually defended this work.
I think an excellent example of how repugnant these memos are can be found in this memo by Stephen Bradbury...where he says, among other things "yes, if people do this to our guys we'd call it torture, but it's fine in this case. And oh, we can't guarantee that a court will agree with this reasoning if anyone ever asks. But don't worry, no one ever will"
That's fairly sick. Yes, you're breaking the law, but don't worry, just keep it secret and you're set.