QUOTE (Tex @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:59 PM)
The issue I always have with this is it presumes that elected officials should only take money from causes and groups they oppose and that these same groups should only donate to candidates that disagree with them. That seems like an even worse message. Put another way, if NSS was our Senator, I know he would support alternative energy plans. His family may also share his outlook on alternative energy and want to be on those boards. Also, I would expect those companies to donate to his campaign. Later, when he votes in favor of legislation that helps the alternative energy companies, is he doing it because he will benefit, or because that is what he believes is correct?
I have read and heard some excellent, well reasoned, opinions on both sides of this debate and prefer to think the best if our elected officials.
But if a majority of your constituents are for something and you're against it because you or your spouse will benefit from the status quo then I have a problem with that.