Everything posted by Dick Allen
-
Why would you trade Bobby Jenks?
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 11:00 PM) Vazquez a closer. He has more value as a starter. The I dont know, someone will be available is bulls***. Jenks is cheap, dirt freaking cheap. He is under control for a long time. So the risk is minimal. Who is this mysterious golden arm that will come in here, and be our closer. Mind you for dirt cheap because rebuilding teams dont spend a ton of money on their closer. After this year of crap in the pen, people should be looking to keep what is good in our pen, and jettison what is bad. Yet it seems that we want to get rid of our good closer, because of bad memories of past players. I don't know where this board gets it, but there isn't a chance in hell KW goes into a total rebuilding mode this offseason. Not with Konerko, Thome, Vazquez, Contreras, Garland and/or Buerhle on the roster. You want me to give you a name, how could I? I don't talk to GMs. What's BS is thinking Bobby Jenks is a lock to be good for a long time. I agree with you, he's one of the few guys in the bullpen that deserves a major league check. I stated that above. I also stated I wouldn't just trade him to get rid of him. It would depend on what I got back. And with his declining velocity and human being's natural tendency to gain weight as they get older, and the fact that there is a screw in his right elbow, I don't think the return on him is what anyone would be looking for. Vazquez is a mediocre starter IMO. I think he would be a great closer and I'm one of his biggest critics. But I realize it won't happen, as I have already stated. Let the season end, and let me see who's available, and I'll give you a couple of names.
-
Why would you trade Bobby Jenks?
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 10:46 PM) Who is going to close the games next year. Give me a name. Just saying, it needs to be blown up. Sure thats easy. Who is his replacement. I don't know. Someone will be available. KW should have some starters to dangle around. As I said, I would need to know the return before dealing Jenks, who still is effective, but a guy who they run ads about boasting about his ability to throw a ball really hard. I'm very concerned. He reminds me of Bob James. They both threw very hard, both had some weight problems, and James went from great to horrible very quickly. I'd even think about making Vazquez a closer although I'm sure KW wouldn't consider it considering his salary. I'd think he could be excellent going 1 inning a night and cutting down on the number of different pitches he throws.
-
Why would you trade Bobby Jenks?
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 10:35 PM) Well praytell, who should we put in if we get rid of Bobby. Trading him sure, teams would jump at it. But if you get frustrated with him, wait till his replacement toes with rubber. As I said above, I would wait until the offseason to trade him, or the Sox could lose 100 games the way the rest of the bullpen performs. The current bullpen is horrible. It needs to be blown up. I thought last year was bad. Considering Jenks has 20 less strikeouts in 5 2/3 less innings than his rookie year though, you would have to admit his stuff isn't as intimidating, and not on the curve you would find ideal.
-
Why would you trade Bobby Jenks?
QUOTE(max power @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 10:30 PM) It wasn't even like he got beat up out there either. A lucky fisted double and a high chopper single cost him. Sometimes luck isn't on your side. These things probably don't happen if he's got his good gas.
-
Why would you trade Bobby Jenks?
I'd trade him, but not until the offseason. He is one of only 2 or 3 guys in the bullpen that actually should be getting a major league check. As much as I know its useless to people who know better, its much better for the Sox to win 80-84 games this season than 70-75. The season tickebase is a house of cards IMO. A 90 win season and the so-called season ticket waiting list is long gone. There will be a lot of cancellations this year if no playoffs. But a team thats well below .500 could mean box office disaster. This offseason, if KW can acquire someone who can close or make someone a closer, I'm all for trading him, depending of course on the return. FWIW save percentage is a little overrated. Jenks probably leads the league in coming in with a 3 run lead. Shingo was 8 for 9 in saves when he lost his job.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:58 PM) totally especially since hes been one of the best closers in the league this season. But yeah, good point He has a lot of saves, but he hasn't been as dominating. His second half of 2006 wasn't very good. I hope we aren't seeing the beginning of a rerun. He never would have become the folk hero he became if he was throwing 93 in 2005.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:56 PM) The infielder that plays left misplays a ball he should of caught that. Listening to Hawk and DJ gush about him, you think everyone strives to be like him and Grinerstad.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:56 PM) Well in the last two off seasons, he has been quoted about getting in shape, and doing some weight lifting. If he is doing anything up top, benching or such he needs to cut it. You can really mess up your velocity by doing heavy lifting. Shouldn't the team be monitoring his every move? What ever happened to Allen Thomas?
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:54 PM) I love his current pitch speed just as much as I love your avatar. Paris told me its hot
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(greg775 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:54 PM) are we blowing the lead? i don't have it on tv here I'll give you a hint. Ozzie went to the bullpen.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(Jordan4life_2007 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:53 PM) I have to go back a while to remember a Sox bullpen this pathetic. I can't remember one ever.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:52 PM) It's sad to see Jenks turn into a slider/curve pitcher now. If you go back and watch the 2005 DVD, it's a completely different pitcher. The confrontation with Bagwell in the WS was epic. He was just throwing gas.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(Linnwood @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:51 PM) Awesome job Bobby. Does anyone think Bobby doesn't miss the 98-100 mph gas?
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:51 PM) A high chopper, and the range of a mouse in a wheelchair over at 2nd and its a tie game. I've never seen a mouse in a wheelchair. I'm guessing they don't move so well.
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:49 PM) What is this a picture of, the stands down the LF line at USCF prior to 2005?
-
White Sox vs. Orioles, 7/02/07 (L)
QUOTE(29thandPoplar @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 07:07 PM) Can't disagree with you on that. Thome gets on base though, the White Sox usually end up getting, what, 5-6 hits vs. Bedard? Put Hall in for Pierzynski, he's a catcher. No wait, the Orioles have Brian Roberts and Hall can't throw. I am just saying why Guillen is doing what he's doing. AJ can't throw either. If Hall plays, Buerhle is a good one for him to catch because of his move. I think Toby would be in the line-up if he had a hit the last month or so. Of course it is hard to hit getting 2 ABs a week.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
The White Sox are crying about losing their speed. Pods and Erstad. Have they not been paying attention the last several years? Why would it shock anyone they are injured? Its the reason they don't get huge contracts.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:25 PM) Pods can stay on DL make it 60 days he will get hurt again anyway! It won't be long before he will get injured while on the DL. I see no conceivable way KW brings Barbaro (good one fathom) back next year. If he does, at any price, he should be looking for another job.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:22 PM) Do you suppose it's accurate to say that Jerry Owens is a poor man's Nook Logan? He's like a homeless man's Omar Moreno.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:21 PM) I'd so rather see Sweeney up than Owens. I think he may actually turn into something eventually, but I certainly would rather see Sweeney up here than Owens again. Too bad the designated runner didn't fly with MLB. He's perfectly suited for that.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:19 PM) I had my over/under at 39.5 plate appearances. Suck on that. What do you think about Dye? I've got my number at 6. Innings.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:19 PM) 78 games, 76 at bats. Solid. You can talk about how much lead off guys were getting paid this past offseason, funny how KW is going to pay Pods more per plate appearance than any of them.
-
Pods to be placed on DL
Reifert said it probably would be Owens coming up. At least when Garland pitches, they should let Garland hit and DH for Owens. He really can't hit. QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 06:14 PM) I'm stunned that are three starting outfielders from opening day are injured at the same time. Who would have ever thought Pods and Erstad would get hurt? How long will Dye last? My over/under is 6 innings.
-
KW Speaks about Buehrle's NTC
The should name the AL DL after Pods and the NL DL after Prior and Wood(s). As far as Buerhle leaving money on the table, I don't think there's any doubt if he has a second half like his first half he would be able to get more than 4 years and more than $14 million if that is accurate. If he gets hurt like a lot of people think is inevitable, he would be leaving money on the table. Take Bartolo Colon . He signed for 4 years with the Angels. If he had just taken 3 at the same price, there is no way he would have been able to get what he's being paid this year on the open market due to his surgery. If Buerhle has an injury that ends his career, any additional money he could have signed for would have been "left on the table".
-
Tank ... TANKED!!!
QUOTE(daa84 @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 04:43 PM) tank was under the legal limit.... his BAC was .072 which is just under the legal limit of .08......so tank did not break the law.... He may have been legal but he's still stupid. Going 40 in a 25 at 3:30 am and only .008 from being drunk, after all he's just been through. Probably a half a beer from being in a lot of trouble. Don't worry, Tank will hook up with another team and find his way to legal problems again.