StrangeSox

Trump And Marijuana: Justice Department Contacts Colorado Officials About Cannabis Cases I really do not understand who the "crack down on pot" constituency is. edit: legalizing pot could also help ease the opiod epidemic

QUOTE (G&T @ Mar 31, 2017 -> 01:47 PM) 100% agree. If he had anything he would have immunity by now. Also, not that the National Enquirer stuff can ever be confirmed, but it seems like Trump is trying to throw him under the bus. Wouldn't do that if he had any valuable intel. I certainly don't have my hopes up or anything, but it's also possible that Flynn may have good information but that the FBI/Senate already has that information and more and doesn't need Flynn to corroborate it.

Hey polonium can take a few weeks to kill ya

QUOTE (JenksIsMyHero @ Mar 31, 2017 -> 12:29 PM) Or they're negotiating. I would imagine denying immunity is a common initial "offer." House Dems (Schiff) said they're considering it, Senate flat-out rejected it. I don't think these discussions typically play out in public at all, though. But yeah I'm not reading too much into any of it beyond "the former national security advisor to the President, who had to resign only a few weeks into his administration, is now trying to negotiate an immunity deal in exchange for testimony on Day 70 of this administration." I'm glad at least the Senate appears to be taking their jobs seriously unlike the clowns running things in the House.

He also might not really have much of anything worthwhile, or they don't want to give him the ability to Ollie North his way out of a later conviction.

Trump Leaves Science Jobs Vacant, Troubling Critics Trump still has several hundred Senate-confirmed positions that he's yet to even nominate anyone for.

The entire coal industry employs fewer people than Arby’s

Inside Alabama’s Auto Jobs Boom: Cheap Wages, Little Training, Crushed Limbs The South’s manufacturing renaissance comes with a heavy price.

This is just more funny than anything, at least given the scale, but the US Treasury Secretary had to take the time to formally apologize for promoting the Lego Batman movie

QUOTE (illinilaw08 @ Mar 31, 2017 -> 10:04 AM) Rabbit, 55% of the eligible population voted in 2016. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/pop...e-turnout-2016/ Of that amount, 45.2M voted for a Democratic Senate candidate, while 39.3 for a Republican Senate candidate. Despite that fact, the Rs control the Senate. In the House, it was 56.3M Republican votes vs. 53.2M Democratic votes. For the Presidency, well, we all know that HRC got more votes in the popular vote. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politic...e-too/93598998/ So, if 55% of eligible voters cared enough to vote, then we can assume the other 45% don't share any particular party affiliation. Based on the split of votes, and the number of votes to each side from people who don't identify as D or R, it looks like 25% of the population as Rs is a fairly accurate number. Now, that doesn't mean 75% of the population is D, obviously. The Republicans are "wiping the floor" with the Democrats because they control the rural vote. But, a mere 8 years ago, the Ds had majorities in both Houses and controlled the Presidency. Control is cyclical, and parties who think that control represents a "mandate" find themselves quickly losing control. Gallup (and others) run polls gauging party self-identification. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx It was an offhand joke based on historic party affiliation levels.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson spends his first weeks isolated from an anxious bureaucracy

QUOTE (raBBit @ Mar 31, 2017 -> 12:23 AM) This isn't verbatim but he said republicans don't care about others. Well... GOP lawmaker: The Bible says the unemployed ‘shall not eat’ Jesus Was a Selfish Asshole, Says Noted Bible Scholar Erick Erickson

McCain told McCaskill that more Republicans will call for an independent investigation into Trump when he drops five more points in the polls. https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/847570326317936643 Edit removed shot at McCain because he actually has called for independent investigation

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 08:10 PM) Pretty sure Tom Clancy wrote this already. Nah, liberals and environmentalists would be the bad guys in his version

Wapo reporting that Nunes got fed info from three White House sources now. https://t.co/1L4qV37kMV

QUOTE (illinilaw08 @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 05:48 PM) Flynn reportedly offers to testify on Russia in exchange for immunity. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-roo...ge-for-immunity A statement from his lawyers indicating that he is, in fact, seeking immunity. https://twitter.com/robkelner/status/847590575352270850 Michael Flynn to NBC in September: "When you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime."

Nunes now admits he got info from the White House. https://twitter.com/KatyTurNBC/status/847590026926055424 No word on whether he still thinks he serves Donald Trump rather than the House/his constituents.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 05:38 PM) Where did Steve say anyone was "bad people"? Besides, Republican party ID is only like 25% anyway!

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/847526477365161984

Greg, you don't seem to be understanding what people, including myself, mean when we say we want Trump to fail. -Trump's agenda will cause bad things to happen -We do not want bad things to happen -Ergo, we want Trump to fail at implementing his agenda Trump succeeding and the US succeeding are not necessarily the same thing. That's it. We don't want "the US" to fail. We want Trump and his plans, which we think will be harmful to the US, to fail. If Trump succeeds, people will needlessly suffer, and we don't want that.

Also some shake-ups in the White House again, this time Deputy Chief of Staff and Priebus ally Katie Walsh is stepping down Senior aide Katie Walsh leaves White House to run pro-Trump outside group

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 12:25 PM) 2 White House Officials Helped Give Nunes Intelligence Reports One of these guys is a Flynn flunkie that McMasters tried to fire but was overruled by Trump http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trum...overrule-236065

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 12:42 PM) The penalty for not being insured wouldn't even cover one emergency room visit. Theoretically not being insured and still getting sick or hit by a bus raised costs for all, so it's really not that different from mandatory car insurance, which no one ever says boo about. Let me introduce you to the SovCit movement who DO NOT CREATE JOINED WITH YOU and are not driving but TRAVELING and therefore do not need a driver's license or insurance

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 30, 2017 -> 12:38 PM) f*** really? Thats crazy. Yep! Back in late 19th, early 20th century big cities like NYC and Chicago had multiple competing fire companies. They'd even sabotage each other trying to make sure they got there first in order to get the business. In modern times, in more rural areas there are still fire protection subscriptions for people who aren't otherwise covered by any municipal or county fire services. These fire departments don't realistically have the budgets to cover huge rural areas, so they charge fairly low fees to anyone who lives outside the area. They'll still come out to contain the fire even if you don't pay, but they won't save your house. If they did, that'd create a moral hazard where everyone would know that you didn't really have to bother paying the regular fee. https://usnews.newsvine.com/_news/2011/12/0...er-75-fee-again