QUOTE(qwerty @ May 6, 2005 -> 06:27 PM)
Does nash belong on this list?
There are easily several players more deserving than nash is. Mvp's should be an mvp on both sides of the court, no? John stockon was everything nash was this year but better year in year out and was an excellent defender, yet he was never in the top five voting for mvp.
15 years ago, amare would be the mvp candidate and nash would just be an elite point guard. Mvo is suppose to be the best player in the league. Is nash the best player in the league? Voting has changed so much nowadays it is sick.
You just f***ing told me a week ago his D wasn't too shabby.
Also-MVP=Player most valuable to their team, not best player.