QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 24, 2005 -> 10:49 AM)
Yeah, well, you could still take a QB in the fifth or sixth...
Yeah, well, we can still get DB in the fifth or sixth...
Obviously JA felt the dropoff in QB from 4-5/6 was greater than our need positions.
QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 24, 2005 -> 10:17 AM)
Willie you need to get off the Bears kool aid
Oh the irony is rich
Saban could have picked his mother in the 1st round and you wouldn't have been angry.
Thanks a ton for helping me keep this updated BHAM.
I obviously can't see him play and can only go by box scores and stat lines. It's great to have such a good source of info.
Alright I just would like to see something in training camp and preseason before taking a dump on Bradley.
He is an athletic freak in all catagories and takes it to the house when he gets his chances.
QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 10:00 PM)
I noticed that too, I would rather have Roby than 2nd-round-raw-project-special-teams-potential WR.
And if we picked Roby there is someone else you would complain JA shoulda picked.
QUOTE(qwerty @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 07:56 PM)
When i said he was gonna be huge for us this year people just laughed.
You also said Hermanson would be sub par
QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 23, 2005 -> 07:45 PM)
*sigh* Didnt wanna have to pull a juggernaut
Mark Clayton - 66 rec 876 yards 8 TD's
Mark Bradley - 23 rec 491 yards 7 TD's
That is not really as close as your trying to make it seem.. especially in an offense that is a spread offense.. Its a risky pick thats all im saying..
My point is we picked Bradley to be a playmaker, playmakers score touchdowns.
He got the same amount as a 1st rounder.
He also had the same as Williamson.
Playmakers make plays, Bradley made plays last year.