LowerCaseRepublican

It amazes me Heather how much you try to make me angry. The fact that you spend that much time is very amusing to me.

Rush claims to know a lot of things then really doesn't have a clue. And Matt Drudge, this guy is a lying asshat. In "Blinded by the Right", David Brock, an ex-conservative that was one of the head character assassins for the GOP, states that he [brock] wrote a story for a major newspaper [can't remember the name off the top of my head...just got off work] that Drudge's commentary about Brock's book was lies...essentially because Drudge never read anything about the book. Brock insisted that the extreme right wingers were doing damage control after being exposed for their crimes by an insider. Brock also insisted that Drudge was angry that Brock shot down Drudge's sexual propositions. Brock produced the e-mails showing this as well. Drudge has since gone on a witch hunt against Brock. So, I don't trust Drudge much at all...about anything.

I thought you were going to say "BANZAI is the most retarded show since The View"

I heard he's a real fine "law talking guy". In reality though, CWSox seems to have some knowledge of law and may be the best person on here to ask.

I have spent $5 on CD's before but not on RIAA "artists". :finger RIAA

1) CHW 2) Robbie 3) 1 4) 6 5) 1 6) 4 7) Olivo 8) Split 9) No 10) Yes Sox + 4

What about the threads like "BMR" and "HeaterLee" that have no point? Why didn't you go apes*** over those two threads? Or the poll on "Finding Nemo"? What is the purpose of that? What intellectual vigor does that hold, oh almighty Koch This? And last time I checked, Koch, MATMOK never held a f***ing gun to your head and clicked it. You're the f***ing moron who clicked the link. How about taking some responsibility for your own idiocy? And please, you have yet to explain how he is a tool. So explain.

I haven't used the Pornolizer in a long time. It's always good for a laugh. And Koch This, would you mind explaining how he's a tool for posting this link? And no bulls***? f***, the entire Off Topic board is all bulls***. And you can see what the link is by seeing the bottom of the window so you have no excuse for being a moron and clicking on random links at work. You aren't so angry about what the link was but more that you were an idiot and clicked random links at work. Don't blame him, blame yourself for not checking the web address before clicking.

Well, he is an asshat.

Damn, Murcie J!

High Crimes and Misdemeanors Slander: Liberal lies about the American Right Treason Those are the 3 books she has written. Yes, 1549, that is the Ann Coulter we are talking about. 1549, if he loved the book he may want to see the critiques that she didn't get years right and essentially re-wrote history to fit her ideology. I'm not talking revision, I'm talking changing years things happened etc. I wonder if she is ever going to find something that she can like as much as she hates liberals.

David Byrne "Feelings" Nerf Herder "American Cheese"

Santorum n. the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter at the finish of anal sex --winning definition for Santorum in the "Savage Love" column This is a little letter from my friend Adam that he wrote to a local newspaper. For a guy who spent most of his time alone in the hills with twelve other men, you'd think Jesus would have had a soft spot in his heart for homosexuals. Even if it was a hard one, homosexuals should still be allowed to marry just like heterosexuals are. I could make the argument that this nation was founded on the idea of individual liberty. I could also mention a little thing we call the separation of church and state. Since those arguments never seem to make it through the skulls of Bible thumpers, I'm not going to try those. Instead, I'd like to point out some other things. According to the Bible, it's a sin to divorce your spouse, and yet nearly half of American marriages end in divorce. According to the Bible, it's a sin to masturbate, but I doubt you can find a man in America who isn't busy killing kittens with every spare moment. According to the Bible, we shouldn't be lending money at interest, drinking alcohol, or eating pork. I also remember a few lines about judging people and casting stones, but maybe I'm not misinterpreting them correctly. If we're going to start making our laws according to the Bible, why start with this one? I think its because a few insecure and ignorant people want to perpetuate their bigotry against one of the last minorities that it's still acceptable to persecute. Either that or Americans want mortal law to fix that little flaw in divine law that allows us all free will. Maybe it's just me, but I thought America was about the allowing everyone the pursuit of happiness, not helping us resist what some consider temptation. I'm a vegetarian, and I think everyone should learn to resist the urge to eat meat. Would I ever support a law making it illegal for someone to shove a hot dog down his or her throat? No.

There is no doubt that she is, I just thought that calling her on her lies would be more productive. And I think she should be the poster child for why horses should not have sex with lamp-posts.

http://spinsanity.org/columns/20030630.html This b**** could do Goebbels proud. What about when Rummy met with him and shook his hand??? And Coulter says "In March 1946, Truman ostentatiously rebuffed Winston Churchill after his famous Iron Curtain speech in Fulton, Missouri...[He] instructed Sec. of State Dean Acheson not to attend a reception for Churchill a week later in New York." First, according to Joe Conason on salon.com, Acheson wasn't appointed to Sec. of State until 1949. Second, it was the Sec. of State at the time, James Byrnes who actually urged Acheson to not attend the event in New York. [Acheson did have a "cordial" lunch with Churchill shortly thereafter] Furthermore, Truman was the one who invited Churchill to his home state of Missouri -- and he read Churchill's speech in reverence, telling him the warning about communism would do "nothing but good." I know not all Republicans are like Shemp Hannity, Ann Coulter, Rush, etc. It's just fun to see the right's pundits lying so obviously that it makes the left's work easier.

What about the fireworks ones where they had Royce, Carlos, etc. making explosion noises?

They don't have "Seen and Heard" by Kyle Williams on that page. And they call themselves a conservative bookstore.

Which raceway? Chicagoland Raceway or Route 66? I live close to both of them.

Happy birthday, CW.

Well, they sure are not going to find that African uranium that Bush said they definitely had in his State of the Union speech because IT WAS A LIE when he said it. And, Clujer, if we knew they had them, had satellite photos of where the buildings and stuff were as said in Powell's UN speech and if we knew where stuff was, then why can't we find it?

Just watching Dontrelle Willis K the Cubbies and they said that Hasek is going to come out of retirement to join the Detroit Red Wings.

http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/Sava...vageTVShow.html Michael "Weiner" Savage has come out with his apology. He basically says that he should not be held responsible because it was a "crank caller from a competitive show" that called him and that he didn't realize he was on the air when he said those things. You're on TV...and you don't realize that what you say will go out to millions of people??? :finger Savage if you expect us to believe that excuse. He shouldn't say that kind of stuff in the first place, he's just angry that he got caught saying it and trying to justify it.

1) Who will win the series (CHW/DET) (2 points)? CHW 2) Will Jon Garland give up a homerun (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes 3) How many errors will the Sox make (4 points)? 2 4) Which Sox infielder will have the most hits (4 points)? Jose 5) How many walks will Frank have in the series (5 points)? 3 6) What will Loaiza's ERA be after the series (I will give 0.1 either way) (5 points)? 2.17 7) How many saves will the Sox have (4 points)? 1 8) Will Frank Thomas make the All Star Team (Y/N) (2 points)? No 9) Will Carl Everett have at least 5 hits in the series (Y/N) (2 points)? No 10) Will Jeremy Bonderman have 14 losses after this series (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes TIEBREAKER: How many runners will the Sox strand as a team for the series? 24

They are not just academic. The Chimpy war criminal can still be held accountable. Benefits? Benefits for who? The fact that we pumped OIL before pumping water? The fact that there are still riots because people are without food, water and electricity because those who had it lost it during the "shock and awe" bombings? We are bringing "suspected terrorists" to Pakistan to torture them, so the US cannot claim a higher moral ground about ending torture. The benefit that we protected the Ministry of Oil while allowing looting and violence to create anarchy there? The benefit that the Washington Post is reporting US forces are stopping local elections and installing their own men to lead in Iraq? Saddam was evil. But the fact remains that NONE OF THE REASONS Bush gave to justify war have been realized. If he wanted to go to war with Saddam, he should have built the case on FACTS and not lies. Support the troops: Let the President kill them in Iraq for lies!

CW, You French loving commie scum! Ashcroft is gonna come get us! [And in that photo, there are two boobs shown ]