Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Corey Ray a 1B coach for Nats, and other off-season Old Friend News

Featured Replies

33 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

Then I'm guessing the White Sox aren't ruing trying to slip Rolison through waivers. 

You know better than to judge a pitcher by one single appearance in AZ of all places...might as well be Charlotte.

 

Is Clevinger going to win the By Young with Pitt since he hasn't allowed a run this spring in Florida?

  • Replies 205
  • Views 10.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Autumn Dreamin
    Autumn Dreamin

  • DoUEvenShift
    DoUEvenShift

    Get that bag AV    

  • chitownsportsfan
    chitownsportsfan

    An extremely likeable vet with a pretty lefty swing. Hope he has a nice season for the Mets and he can get some playoff ball.

3 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

You know better than to judge a pitcher by one single appearance in AZ of all places...might as well be Charlotte.

 

Is Clevinger going to win the By Young with Pitt since he hasn't allowed a run this spring in Florida?

Yeah, that's exactly why the article is silly. The premise was using a whopping two scoreless innings as evidence that the Sox would regret the loss of a guy who had been riding the waiver wire.

Meanwhile the Sox have multiple lefties who have thrown a whole THREE scoreless innings! With multiple strikeouts/inning instead of Rolinson's 0!

Like @WestEddy said, it's just filler content. If they kept Rolison over Eisert, you could write the same article and arguably have a better case (Eisert is slightly younger with an additional year, and has been better)

  • Author
28 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

You know better than to judge a pitcher by one single appearance in AZ of all places...might as well be Charlotte.

 

Is Clevinger going to win the By Young with Pitt since he hasn't allowed a run this spring in Florida?

I didn't judge a pitcher by a single appearance. I just said it was funny that the subject was getting lit up as the writer posted his article. The true definition of irony. A result that is the exact opposite of that which was intended, almost as if being mocked by fate.

Thanks for the article. It was content-y. I post stuff, too. Most of it is thumb-twiddling until the actual games start. I jones for any actual reporting. Phalen turns out a bunch of this stuff. The "Here's a Move the Sox Should Consider Making" article about a guy put on waivers. Here's one about Eloy. 

White Sox fans might cringe at slugging disappointment's Blue Jays comeback bid

Quote

It’s only been three games for Jimenez, but the big outfielder is 5-for-8 with two doubles and a homer in the early going. He’s never going to provide much value defensively, but he’s shown the ability to be a middle-of-the-order bat in the past.

It's all good. 

Edited by WestEddy

15 minutes ago, Autumn Dreamin said:

Yeah, that's exactly why the article is silly. The premise was using a whopping two scoreless innings as evidence that the Sox would regret the loss of a guy who had been riding the waiver wire.

Meanwhile the Sox have multiple lefties who have thrown a whole THREE scoreless innings! With multiple strikeouts/inning instead of Rolinson's 0!

Like @WestEddy said, it's just filler content. If they kept Rolison over Eisert, you could write the same article and arguably have a better case (Eisert is slightly younger with an additional year, and has been better)

Except former first round draft picks never die...especially in the Sox system.

See Kelenic.

Sox probably lead MLB in former Top 100 prospects since 2016/17 to hit their roster from other organizations.

3 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

I didn't judge a pitcher by a single appearance. I just said it was funny that the subject was getting lit up as the writer posted his article. The true definition of irony. A result that is the exact opposite of that which was intended, almost as if being mocked by fate.

Thanks for the article. It was content-y. I post stuff, too. Most of it is thumb-twiddling until the actual games start. I jones for any actual reporting. Phalen turns out a bunch of this stuff. The "Here's a Move the Sox Should Consider Making" article about a guy put on waivers. Here's one about Eloy. 

White Sox fans might cringe at slugging disappointment's Blue Jays comeback bid

It's all good. 

Maybe he should put out a White Sox trade half their roster for Skubal article...

There has been at least 20-30 proposed Skubal trade articles the last months.

Most of them at least more realistically pair him with the Dodgers.

Julks and Pilkington appearing for the Tigers in the DR...Jimmy Cordero closing first DR today.

At 97.  Nasty slider for a K.

 

And a blown lead lol.  4-3.

Was 3-1 DR over DET into the 9th.

Gage Workman part of the rally.  Seth Stephenson two out two strike two run single off Cordero.

DR won yesterday fwiw.

Edited by caulfield12

He hasn't played in a real game yet, but at least there's this?

  • Author
47 minutes ago, Autumn Dreamin said:

He hasn't played in a real game yet, but at least there's this?

Acuña hit one in a big league ST game. Win. 

10 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

Acuña hit one in a big league ST game. Win. 

+ $22 million

  • 2 weeks later...

Liam topping out under 94mph is so foreign to me...still rooting for him though.

On 3/6/2026 at 9:04 PM, Autumn Dreamin said:

He hasn't played in a real game yet, but at least there's this?

Let’s be honest — the Mets are managing his injury-prone ass way better than the Sox ever did. Robert could still very well get injured, but I recall the Sox having Robert active and in the lineup when he wasn’t even healthy yet and simply told him to jog the bases rather than run full speed. He was clearly still hobbled. And it’s not like the Sox learned anything from that situation. Remember last season when Tauchman was obviously not ready yet and he reinjured himself running the bases at a snail’s pace? So they played the same stupid injury game with both their franchise player and an old vet on a one year deal. The Sox are historically dumb as hell when it comes to this.

Edited by WhiteSox2023

1 hour ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Let’s be honest — the Mets are managing his injury-prone ass way better than the Sox ever did. Robert could still very well get injured, but I recall the Sox having Robert active and in the lineup when he wasn’t even healthy yet and simply told him to jog the bases rather than run full speed. He was clearly still hobbled. And it’s not like the Sox learned anything from that situation. Remember last season when Tauchman was obviously not ready yet and he reinjured himself running the bases at a snail’s pace? So they played the same stupid injury game with both their franchise player and an old vet on a one year deal. The Sox are historically dumb as hell when it comes to this.

Hell they had Robert playing half a season swinging the bat basically one armed his other one was hurt so badly it looked like.

1 hour ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

Let’s be honest — the Mets are managing his injury-prone ass way better than the Sox ever did. Robert could still very well get injured, but I recall the Sox having Robert active and in the lineup when he wasn’t even healthy yet and simply told him to jog the bases rather than run full speed. He was clearly still hobbled.

Is the bolded not dependent on whether or not it bears fruit? The season is a week away and he has 11 ABs and 23 innings in the field. I assume he's getting reps in the backfields or cages somewhere, but how much caution keeps him from being ramped up and ready for an everyday starting role next week, given that his last game will have been a full 6 months prior? And if that caution is an all season thing, how big is the benefit of getting 100-110 games of him "on purpose" instead of by accident/circumstance?

But I agree that he played through injuries regularly here, in part due to carrying the mantle of being a "cornerstone" in a way he won't have to in NY. The staff needs to protect guys from themselves when necessary, but I do think he took after Abreu a bit (who famously wouldn't sit for anything...except a send off from the fans apparently) which is why I've never liked implications that he was lazy or didn't care.

25 minutes ago, Autumn Dreamin said:

Is the bolded not dependent on whether or not it bears fruit? The season is a week away and he has 11 ABs and 23 innings in the field. I assume he's getting reps in the backfields or cages somewhere, but how much caution keeps him from being ramped up and ready for an everyday starting role next week, given that his last game will have been a full 6 months prior? And if that caution is an all season thing, how big is the benefit of getting 100-110 games of him "on purpose" instead of by accident/circumstance?

But I agree that he played through injuries regularly here, in part due to carrying the mantle of being a "cornerstone" in a way he won't have to in NY. The staff needs to protect guys from themselves when necessary, but I do think he took after Abreu a bit (who famously wouldn't sit for anything...except a send off from the fans apparently) which is why I've never liked implications that he was lazy or didn't care.

Regarding your first paragraph, I guess we will have to see. I already said that Robert is injury-prone and he could easily get hurt regardless of any of this early Spring Training protection.

However, regarding your second paragraph, the Sox pulled the same nonsense of playing guys that were still injured with not just their franchise player but a veteran in Tauchman as well, and that was as recently as last season. In both cases, it led to further time on the IR for both players. How often was it mentioned that the Sox would keep injured players on their active roster instead of calling a healthy player up and still choose to either play the banged up player or simply play games a man down? The Sox have been pretty bad at injury and roster management for years.

Edited by WhiteSox2023

  • Author

Pallette makes the Guardians' opening day roster.

Edited by WestEddy

  • Author
1 minute ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

6 innings

3 hits

3 walks

11 strikeouts

0 earned runs

They just lost two advanced pitchers. Cleveland needs bodies.

7 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

They just lost two advanced pitchers. Cleveland needs bodies.

I don’t think much of ST stats but he definitely earned the gig.

.

Edited by WhiteSox2023

42 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

They just lost two advanced pitchers. Cleveland needs bodies.

Hopefully he doesn’t make Alexander Alberto look like the dumbest Rule 5 pick of all time.

Turns out the Mets haven't found the magic injury prevention button after all. Hope it's nothing too bad for Tauch.

  • Author
12 minutes ago, Autumn Dreamin said:

1zr51el6hhqg1.jpeg?auto=webp&s=b5bf6580b

Does he not trust his agent?

On 3/21/2026 at 2:36 PM, Autumn Dreamin said:

Turns out the Mets haven't found the magic injury prevention button after all. Hope it's nothing too bad for Tauch.

Tauchman is 35 and injury-prone. Not a surprise. I still think the Mets are managing Robert better than the Sox ever did. Can Robert still get injured? Of course.

Edited by WhiteSox2023

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.