To be fair, Noah Schultz doesn't throw with much extension. One of those recent prospect rankings (Law?) cites it as a deficit to his profile.

1 hour ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

The reason he's dropped are because of things outside of his ceiling/talent level.

He's the only unicorn prospect the White Sox have in my opinion.

I’m with you on this 

2 hours ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

The reason he's dropped are because of things outside of his ceiling/talent level.

He's the only unicorn prospect the White Sox have in my opinion.

As of today, he's the only guy I could squint and see perennial all-star, MVP, Cy Young, type talent.  There are some ceilings in this system, but I would top Schultz as a 70, while the others are 60 to 65 tops.

22 hours ago, SoxAce said:

I like him more than Cholowsky personally but I know that's a small group of us. Elite speed. Power potential is crazy too. 

Agree thanks for sharing !! 

15 hours ago, Jake said:

To be fair, Noah Schultz doesn't throw with much extension. One of those recent prospect rankings (Law?) cites it as a deficit to his profile.

How much correlation to performance is there, and how coachable is this?

21 hours ago, Jake said:

To be fair, Noah Schultz doesn't throw with much extension. One of those recent prospect rankings (Law?) cites it as a deficit to his profile.

I just meant the point where he releases the ball is unique due to his size and the other variables i noted. His arm angle isnt really one that maximizes actual extension.

3 hours ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

I just meant the point where he releases the ball is unique due to his size and the other variables i noted. His arm angle isnt really one that maximizes actual extension.

While granted these are advantages and makes his stuff play up, he just doesn't have the stuff of someone like Oppor. 

There aren't many lefties that have the raw stuff and stuff+ metrics like Oppor.