Jump to content

Royce Ring looked good


Chisoxfn
 Share

Recommended Posts

On TV for the Mets against the Dodgers. He got them in order and did a nice job moving the ball. Was throwing his fastball between 86-88.

 

Franco said he's probably the future closer.

 

He looked pretty smooth out there and no one even got close to hitting him hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me again who we traded Ring, et al, for and why?

Rupe was the guy the Sox will miss, imo.

 

They traded them for a chance to win it all and on paper they had the best team in the AL, imo.

 

Unfortunately Manuel and the players failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rupe was the guy the Sox will miss, imo.

 

They traded them for a chance to win it all and on paper they had the best team in the AL, imo.

 

Unfortunately Manuel and the players failed.

I agree as well. Royce Ring is no great shakes. Fastball in the 86-88 range? BLAH! There are not many lefties that become good closers either. There are a few here and there such as Guardado and Franco, but it is rare. However, Rupe was a really good prospect. I didn't like to see him go.

 

I also believe the players and especially Manuel failed us last year. In my opinion we could have done a lot of damage last year if we could have just made the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rupe was the guy the Sox will miss, imo.

 

They traded them for a chance to win it all and on paper they had the best team in the AL, imo.

 

Unfortunately Manuel and the players failed.

The problem is the players failed in April and May, forcing KW to be in a position to make that trade. If the Sox get off to a better start, deadline deals may not have been necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree as well. Royce Ring is no great shakes. Fastball in the 86-88 range? BLAH! There are not many lefties that become good closers either. There are a few here and there such as Guardado and Franco, but it is rare. However, Rupe was a really good prospect. I didn't like to see him go.

 

I also believe the players and especially Manuel failed us last year. In my opinion we could have done a lot of damage last year if we could have just made the playoffs.

dont forget billy wagner ;)

 

this organization failed its fans from top to bottom...even man soo lee can share some of the blame :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is the players failed in April and May, forcing KW to be in a position to make that trade.  If  the Sox get off to a better start, deadline deals may not have been necessary.

I don't want to take any of the blame away from the players because they were so deserving of it but I have to give JM an equal share too. No way should a team start out a championship season as flat as the Sox did in KC. That and one good April/May in six seasons for JM is simply unacceptable, not with the firepower he had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BeGood,

 

We traded Ray Durham for Jon Adkins. :wacko:

 

It's still hard to gauge Adkins' progress, since he was a one-pitch pitcher who was learning a change of pace pitch (and I assume he's still learning it). So far, his pitching hasn't been all that, but at least his diet has helped a lot of people. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BeGood,

 

We traded Ray Durham for Jon Adkins. :wacko:

 

It's still hard to gauge Adkins' progress, since he was a one-pitch pitcher who was learning a change of pace pitch (and I assume he's still learning it).  So far, his pitching hasn't been all that, but at least his diet has helped a lot of people.    :P

Thank you Pastime, also we traded Durham to the A's and he is now on the Giants ;) , see what researching does for me. :D . I do miss Durham though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to take any of the blame away from the players because they were so deserving of it but I have to give JM an equal share too. No way should a team start out a championship season as flat as the Sox did in KC. That and one good April/May in six seasons for JM is simply unacceptable, not with the firepower he had.

I agree UNS.... I wasn't intending to exclude JM, I was just trying not to rehash exactly the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont mind giving up a junk ball reliever for a guy we keep one year...building a bullpen is the easiest part of any GM's job...you can get quality pitchers for under a million dollars..those guys are very replacable...

 

building a bullpen seems to be the one area KW excels in..shows you how easy it is :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...