November 27, 200421 yr But because the Longhorns' regular holder, wide receiver Tony Jeffery, left the game earlier with a rib injury, backup QB Matt Nordgren was sent in and he dropped the snap, causing Dusty Mangum to drive the kick along the ground. The ensuing scrum ended with the Aggies' Jaxson Appel on top of the ball in the end zone, giving Texas a rare 1-point safety that tied the game at 13. "I'm a little embarrassed," Brown said. "I didn't know that was a rule." Said A&M coach Dennis Franchione, "I don't know that I've ever seen a one-point safety. That was a unique call." Anyone else ever even heard of a one-point safety? I didn't. Sometimes the referees are amazing to me.
November 27, 200421 yr It's bulls***, the ball was kicked, play should have been over. No it was the correct call.. One of the A&M players tried to advance it, then it went into the endzone and the Aggies covered it.. now why it was 1pt insted of 2pt I am not positive on, but the rule they showed on TV said that it was 1pt but again, it was the correct call.. if A&M would have left the ball alone, it would have been nothing.. But once you try to advance it it becomes a 2point conversion attempt insted of a missed XP
November 27, 200421 yr If A&M would have let it be it would have been a 2 point conversiou for Texas right, if they jumped on it... Sorry, I don't really know the rule for this scenario...
November 27, 200421 yr It was the correct call. As soon as a team tries to advance on a two point conversion, the other team is held responsible for picking up a fumble and getting downed in their own endzone. In this case, the Aggies picked up a "fumble" (yes I know it was a botched kick), attempted to advance the ball, and were hit in their own endzone. It was a crazy call, but the right one for the NCAA.
November 27, 200421 yr It was the correct call. As soon as a team tries to advance on a two point conversion, the other team is held responsible for picking up a fumble and getting downed in their own endzone. In this case, the Aggies picked up a "fumble" (yes I know it was a botched kick), attempted to advance the ball, and were hit in their own endzone. It was a crazy call, but the right one for the NCAA. Even though it was a messed up kick, it still goes down like it was a blocked kick As soon as A&M tried to advance it, it then became a 2pt conversion attempt and no WHarris1, if A&M would have let it be, Texas wouldnt have gotten 2 points for jumping on it... If A&M woulda let it be, it woulda been nothing but as missed XP
November 27, 200421 yr and no WHarris1, if A&M would have let it be, Texas wouldnt have gotten 2 points for jumping on it... especially since you cant get a 2pt conversion when YOUR going in to score Yes you can get a 2 point conversion after you score...
November 27, 200421 yr Yes you can get a 2 point conversion after you score... Yes I know, but if A&M woulda let it be, it would have been nothing.. thats what I meant lemme go back and fix that, my bad
November 27, 200421 yr Yes I know, but if A&M woulda let it be, it would have been nothing.. thats what I meant Alright, I gotcha. Sorry, not familiar with the missed XP rules...
November 27, 200421 yr Strange rule.......... one I had never heard of. They showed the explanation on TV last night, but it still seems like a strange rule to me. Seems to me it should just be a touchback, ending the play. But hey, I don't write the rules.
November 27, 200421 yr Seems to me it should just be a touchback, ending the play. But hey, I don't write the rules. Yeah, it should be. I don't see why it's any different. At least it didn't affect the outcome of the game, or at least it didn't seem to unless there was some hidden momentum.
November 27, 200421 yr Yeah, it should be. I don't see why it's any different. At least it didn't affect the outcome of the game, or at least it didn't seem to unless there was some hidden momentum. The reason it was a 1pt safety is because A&M tried to advance it.. that was their mistake.. If you leave it alone, its a missed XP.. they tried to advance it, which was stupid
November 27, 200421 yr The reason it was a 1pt safety is because A&M tried to advance it.. that was their mistake.. If you leave it alone, its a missed XP.. they tried to advance it, which was stupid I know. It remains a stupid rule. It's no different than a touchback.
November 27, 200421 yr I know. It remains a stupid rule. It's no different than a touchback. It is different because A&M tried to advance it.. and if that was a regular play it would have been a 2pt safety.. but your right.. 1pt safety is stupid
November 28, 200421 yr Yeah a 1 point safety would be the right call. That's just plain weird though. I wish I would've seen it.
November 29, 200421 yr Author I am guessing that the logic behind 1 point is that the original play was worth 1pt.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.