http://www.suntimes.com/output/mitchell/cst-nws-mitch03.html

Figures, the team is doing well and gaining popularity and the media will have no part of it.

So the guy disagrees with the waitstaff, and then swears at one of them, and then calls it racism? Please.

So the guy disagrees with the waitstaff, and then swears at one of them, and then calls it racism?  Please.

 

She's the 'race writer' of the paper. I'm not sure if you follow her, but 95% of her articles are about racism. I see and call racism a lot, but a lot of the time she's really reaching for a story.

I don't really have a comment on this other than apparently he DID damage Sox property... But what I can comment on is that it's posted plain as day that no outside drinks are allowed in the SC. And we've many times tried to say "aww.. c'mom, please..." with a full beer and been told in not so nice terms no. Don't like it.. especially when we have a full beer, but that's the rule.

 

As for this guy.. they have cameras in the halls, elevator entrances, and club level doors to the SC.. I'm sure whomever's story is the real one will be played.

:headshake Same story, different day

 

Sounds to me that he brought it all upon himself...There are RULES, and usually they should be followed!

 

This story fits the latest trend of the Sun-Times perfectly

The headline should read- We couldnt find anything else to write about

She's the 'race writer' of the paper.  I'm not sure if you follow her, but 95% of her articles are about racism. I see and call racism a lot, but a lot of the time she's really reaching for a story.

 

Thanks for the notes... I rarely read the ST.

Thanks for the notes... I rarely read the ST.

 

My nomination for post of the day!!!

This is the same writer who a few years ago claimed she and, her nephew I think, were verbally assaulted and abused by an angry, drunk mob outside of Wrigley. She claimed they called her racial slurs including "Aunt Jemima".

Anyone else remember that?

I don't really have a comment on this other than apparently he DID damage Sox property...  But what I can comment on is that it's posted plain as day that no outside drinks are allowed in the SC. And we've many times tried to say "aww.. c'mom, please..." with a full beer and been told in not so nice terms no. Don't like it.. especially when we have a full beer, but that's the rule.

 

As for this guy.. they have cameras in the halls, elevator entrances, and club level doors to the SC.. I'm sure whomever's story is the real one will be played.

 

 

I can tell you with all certainty that the RACIST in this entire article is Mary Mitchell.

 

She wrote an editorial about a minority owned coffee shop in my neighborhood, and claimed the police were harrassing her.

 

However, the female african american owner failed to disclose that she was renting the coffee shop to underage folks on Friday night and the Cops would bust their drinking parts each and every Friday.

 

The beer bottles, cig butts, and condoms were evidence enough for me that Mary Mitchell didnt do her homework. Most likely, she just finds situations where a black person is in trouble and spins it towards a racial crisis.

 

She gets no respect from me.

I'm not familiar with her really. Didn't she write something in support of R. Kelly once..? I don't read either newspaper... I line my dogs boxes with them

I'm not familiar with her really. Didn't she write something in support of R. Kelly once..? I don't read either newspaper... I line my dogs boxes with them 

 

You sure that doesn't scare them? They could see Kotex-boys face and run!

You sure that doesn't scare them?  They could see Kotex-boys face and run!

 

 

Actually.. they pee on his stuff first.

Why does it shock everyone that a race baiter like Mitchell puts this crap in the times. I mean don't they have Jesse Jackson doing "political commentary". If you want to know where Jackson is on an issue, follow the cameras.

Why does it shock everyone that a race baiter like Mitchell puts this crap in the times.  I mean don't they have Jesse Jackson doing "political commentary".  If you want to know where Jackson is on an issue, follow the cameras.

 

Who was shocked?

It would be awesome if Boyer or someone from the Sox took out a full page ad with a rebuttal. Enough is enough with the press.

Edited May 3, 200520 yr by LosMediasBlancas

Who was shocked?

 

 

Exactly what I was going to post..

 

I don't expect anything but the worst from the media. Probably why I don't read the papers.. LOL

Who was shocked?

 

The next article will be that Ozzie called Doug Padilla a mexican or that Ozzie sexually harasses the female reporters. I hate Kotex boy.

Who was shocked?

It would be awesome if Boyer or someone from the Sox took out a full page ad with a rebuttal. Enough is enough with the press.

 

The last thing the Sox should do is bring more attention to this "incident" by responding to her. That would be exactly what she would want.

She's the 'race writer' of the paper.  I'm not sure if you follow her, but 95% of her articles are about racism. I see and call racism a lot, but a lot of the time she's really reaching for a story.

 

You beat me too the punch. That is her MO. Two white guys could be arguing over whoe gets to change the channel ont he TV and she would find someway to spin it that the situation is racisit because black people cant afford TVs. When I flip through the Sun-Times I skip over her immediatly. I have no interest in people like that.

Mitchell is such a racebaiter!!

 

Let's take the side of the drunk, waitress harrassing, out of control patron that punches walls and screams into a security officers face over the word of the Chicago Police.

 

You wonder why race relations are the way they are. If this is an out of control white patron(which Im sure happens all the time) this isn't even a story, but because the guy was black...you claim racism.

Edited May 3, 200520 yr by Controlled Chaos

The last thing the Sox should do is bring more attention to this "incident" by responding to her. That would be exactly what she would want.

 

 

You're right, it sounds like most people around here would not have even noticed that article.

You beat me too the punch. That is her MO. Two white guys could be arguing over whoe gets to change the channel ont he TV and she would find someway to spin it that the situation is racisit because black people cant afford TVs. When I flip through the Sun-Times I skip over her immediatly. I have no interest in people like that.

 

I read her just to see what drivol she has trumped up.

wonder what he said to the waitress???? sounds like she didn't appreciate it and called "vito"

wonder what he said to the waitress????  sounds like she didn't appreciate it and called "vito"

 

Why do I get the feeling that Vito and this clown have very different ideas about what 'sweet talk' is ?

She's the 'race writer' of the paper.  I'm not sure if you follow her, but 95% of her articles are about racism. I see and call racism a lot, but a lot of the time she's really reaching for a story.

 

This is the same b**** that wrote how Sun Times readers should feel sorry for the suspended DUI driver that hit and killed a Chicago firefighter a few years back responding to a crash with injuries on the Bishop Ford Expressway because he was going to go to jail for a few years and wouldn't be able to be there for his young son. Nevermind the fact that the firefighter had 2 daughters of his own that would NEVER SEE HIM AGAIN cause of this jerkoff.

 

f*** Mary Mitchell.

 

A perfect example of a C.U.N.T