July 10, 200619 yr The starters actually have worked relatively deep into games, with the bullpen totaling 2151/3 innings, the fewest in the American League. Considering the starters haven't been as lights out as last year, this is still a very important statistic as the year progresses. And since Riske and Politte were on the DL for part of the year and if Dustin can pitch *fingers crossed* we are going to have a pretty rested bullpen going into the postseason. The starters may not be pitching into the 7th as much, but they are still getting some quality starts, which is a very important stat.
July 10, 200619 yr That stat has been true the whole freaking year. Which is why, a.) Jenks is the key to this bullpen, because a lot of days he's all we need, b.) the 11th guy out of the bullpen isn't that big of a deal because even guy 10 only gets limited innings, and c.) why we need the starting pitching to step it up the 2nd half, because we're going to win or lose on their backs.
July 10, 200619 yr I didn't even realize that they had the lowest amount of innings as a pen, especially after last night. Now if a starting pitcher comes in for relief do those innings count for starting pitching or for relief?
July 10, 200619 yr QUOTE(RME JICO @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 09:55 AM) I didn't even realize that they had the lowest amount of innings as a pen, especially after last night. Now if a starting pitcher comes in for relief do those innings count for starting pitching or for relief? They would count as relief.
July 10, 200619 yr Yea, but it begs the question: are the starters being overworked? Not claiming they are, just throwing that out there.
July 10, 200619 yr QUOTE(chitownsportsfan @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 12:43 PM) Yea, but it begs the question: are the starters being overworked? Not claiming they are, just throwing that out there. Well, there have been complaints on here that they don't go deep enough into games...
July 10, 200619 yr How does Jenks compare to other RP's though... It seems like he is in every game I hope he isnt overworked.
July 10, 200619 yr QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 04:19 PM) How does Jenks compare to other RP's though... It seems like he is in every game I hope he isnt overworked. um just comparing him to some other closers... (innings pitched) Jenks 42 Papelbom 46 Cordero 42 Nathan 36 Turnbow 38 Saito 42 Lidge 42 Putz 42.2 Rivera 46 Ryan 42.2 FRod 37.1 Isringhousing 40.1 Ray 36.2 Jones 34 (he was on DL I think) Wickman 26 Julio 41.2 Wagner 40.2 Hoffman 35 Otsuka 38 Street 38.2 Gordon 37.1 average of 39.2 innings pitched... (the .2 meaning 20% of an inning and not 2 outs) Edited July 10, 200619 yr by tealeafreaderii
July 10, 200619 yr QUOTE(tealeafreaderii @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 04:34 PM) um just comparing him to some other closers... (innings pitched) Jenks 42 Papelbom 46 Cordero 42 Nathan 36 Turnbow 38 Saito 42 Lidge 42 Putz 42.2 Rivera 46 Ryan 42.2 FRod 37.1 Isringhousing 40.1 Ray 36.2 Jones 34 (he was on DL I think) Wickman 26 Julio 41.2 Wagner 40.2 Hoffman 35 Otsuka 38 Street 38.2 Gordon 37.1 average of 39.2 innings pitched... (the .2 meaning 20% of an inning and not 2 outs) Here's the rankings: 1.) Mariano Rivera - 46.0 IP 2.) Jonathan Papelbon - 46.0 IP 3.) BJ Ryan - 42.2 IP 3.) JJ Putz - 42.2 IP 5.) Brad Lidge - 42.0 IP 5.) Chad Cordero - 42.0 IP 7.) Bobby Jenks - 41.1 IP 8.) Billy Wagner - 40.2 IP 8.) Ambriox Burgos - 40.2 IP 10.) Jason Isringhausen - 40.1 IP 11.) Ryan Dempster - 39.2 IP 12.) Huston Street - 38.2 IP 13.) Derrick Turnbow - 38.0 IP 13.) Akinori Otsuka - 38.0 IP 15.) Tom Gordon - 37.1 IP 15.) Francisco Rodriguez - 37.1 IP 16.) Chris Ray - 36.2 IP 17.) Joe Nathan - 36.0 IP 18.) Mike Gonzalez - 35.2 IP 19.) Trevor Hoffman - 35 IP 20.) Brian Fuentes - 34.2 IP 21.) Todd Jones - 34.0 IP 21.) Joe Borowski - 34.0 IP
July 10, 200619 yr QUOTE(tealeafreaderii @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 05:34 PM) (the .2 meaning 20% of an inning and not 2 outs) That's it! What the Sox need, now that Thornton is working regular, is a dedicated LTFOGY.
July 11, 200619 yr That's good. And somewhat of a concern, b/c could a lack of work catch up to the relievers??
July 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(Cuck the Fubs @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 08:38 PM) That's good. And somewhat of a concern, b/c could a lack of work catch up to the relievers?? It didn't last year.
July 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 08:47 PM) It didn't last year. the only guy that might not be getting enough innings is BMac... and I guess polite...
July 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(tealeafreaderii @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 10:58 PM) the only guy that might not be getting enough innings...and I guess polite... HAIL NO any ballgame not in the 19th inning or a run differential of atleast 4 runs where Politte gets in is too many
July 11, 200619 yr It didn't last year. Well I'm thinking b/c it's been 2 years in a row now that this could become a problem, as well as the starters logging heavy innings.
July 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(tealeafreaderii @ Jul 10, 2006 -> 10:58 PM) the only guy that might not be getting enough innings is BMac... and I guess polite... McCarthy needs much more regular work than he is getting.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.