December 4, 200817 yr QUOTE (Steff @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 11:04 PM) Me, too. I have to say that Casio - the black one with the huge display - was right up there but I just couldn't justfy the extra $ with the features of both being so similar. The appearance of the Casio is clearly nicer, but the stainless steel of the Canon is logical with a 1 year old who is all of a sudden wanting to take pictures with mommy's camera Notice how things in the house start moving higher and higher on shelves About this time our decorating theme moved to Little Tykes and Fisher Price. It was about 10 years later when I finally revisited an antique store.
December 4, 200817 yr QUOTE (Steff @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 11:04 PM) Me, too. I have to say that Casio - the black one with the huge display - was right up there but I just couldn't justfy the extra $$ with the features of both being so similar. The appearance of the Casio is clearly nicer, but the stainless steel of the Canon is logical with a 1 year old who is all of a sudden wanting to take pictures with mommy's camera Thats actually a very nice camera you chose though, and Im not sure without double checking but I bet the canon you bought has a higher processor than the casio, which equals better quality of pictures when you blow them up etc. Also, Sony's are not bad cameras at all, the only problem with them is your paying more for a similar product of what you would for other cameras. They do have a lot of nice editing options on the camera itself though.
December 5, 200817 yr QUOTE (Texsox @ Dec 4, 2008 -> 05:55 AM) Notice how things in the house start moving higher and higher on shelves About this time our decorating theme moved to Little Tykes and Fisher Price. It was about 10 years later when I finally revisited an antique store. Our Christmas pictures are all going to be of the top 4 feet of the tree, and not the bottom 3
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.