http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-2...29.storygallery

 

Pretty easy choices for me (and I'm a big Illini fan).

Yeah, I was pretty much in line with everyone else there.

Edited December 21, 200916 yr by kjshoe04

I picked Hester over Bartman.

 

That was a pretty exciting year.

I picked Hester over Bartman.

 

That was a pretty exciting year.

I chose Dweezy over that.

I chose Dweezy over that.

As did I. I didn't even see the hester return because I worked during that super bowl.

As did I. I didn't even see the hester return because I worked during that super bowl.

I saw it, and it was amazing, but the eventual loss in the game has lessened that memory slightly for me.

People really care about the Northwestern Womens Lacrosse? WTF?

People really care about the Northwestern Womens Lacrosse? WTF?

Cubs fans are voting for them, probably.

Just noticed this in the Player of the Decade poll:

 

"Mark Buehrle: No hitter, perfect game, 1-0 with save in World Series, started longest World Series game in history"

 

The "World's Greatest Newspaper" embarrasses itself again; Burls started WS Game 2 and got a ND; Garland started the marathon Game 3 (which Buehrle did save).

Something the Sox have done is winning or in second in every one of those polls.

People really care about the Northwestern Womens Lacrosse? WTF?

 

Its called stuffing the ballot box... not that Soxtalk knows anything about that...

Something the Sox have done is winning or in second in every one of those polls.

 

Well, they're the only major team to actually have done something this decade, so that's probably the reason.

Where in the hell are these message boards that the Tribune claims to have?

Anything related to best of the decade begins and ends with the 2005 White Sox. I understand I am biased but the rest of the options are pointless fodder.

I would agree that MB56 was the best of the decade.