Oh jeez, a Lovie coached team wouldn't miss tackles like that.

Stop being a dummy

Both teams are going to finish this game with 35+ points

If the Bears put up 28 points this half I'll call them winning it.

Briggs seems non-existent out there

He's just not very good anymore.

If the Bears put up 28 points this half I'll call them winning it.

Yeah, I'd be pleasantly surprised if they put up that many points.

You did a decent job of leaving out the 130+ passing Yards Rodgers had in the first half. The Bears gave up ~200 yards in that half, which is pretty poor and about what they've averaged much of the season (and the conditions play somewhat to the defense today). They did keep them out of the end zone I'll give them that...it wasn't a "terrible" first half, but it wasn't playing "well" either.

 

um, I'd take 260 yards passing for the game from Rodgers everyday of the week. And I'd take 400 yds against the Packers every day of the week too.

It's clear our game plan has been to have Major Wright in the box as practically the third LB. Now we're playing w/ 2 LB's and the weak tackling Steltz in place of Wright

Nobody seriously wants Love back. That didn't work out, the great defense pitiful offense. Lovie was going to get worse as opposed to better (wed be picking #1 overall if we had the same coaching as last year). Certain things he preached though this team lacks, and a huge one is the tenacity to getting the football on D.

um, I'd take 260 yards passing for the game from Rodgers everyday of the week. And I'd take 400 yds against the Packers every day of the week too.

You'd take giving up 400 yards every day of the week?

um, I'd take 260 yards passing for the game from Rodgers everyday of the week. And I'd take 400 yds against the Packers every day of the week too.

The Packers average 395 yards per game on the season...so basically you'd be content with an average game from the Packers.

Nobody seriously wants Love back. That didn't work out, the great defense pitiful offense. Lovie was going to get worse as opposed to better (wed be picking #1 overall if we had the same coaching as last year). Certain things he preached though this team lacks, and a huge one is the tenacity to getting the football on D.

That's all anyone has really said

It's pretty idiotic to think how they played on every other play has anything to do with the lack of discipline on the one specific play that was being talked about.

 

And it's not absurd to think that a coach who had a pretty good track record when it came to guys swarming loose balls wouldn't have a problem with guys not swarming loose balls. Nobody was saying Lovie should still be here, or that this defense would be fantastic/good/not-terrible with him here. Just that on one particular play, he always coached his team well not to make the exact type of mistake that lead to an easy TD.

 

I'm sure Tucker loved that his players looked foolish. That wasn't your comment and you know it. You're blaming Tucker for some supposed lack of good coaching despite the fact that these guys were coached by the guy you are praising. Just give it up and admit you made an idiotic statement.

The Packers average 395 yards per game on the season...so basically you'd be content with an average game from the Packers.

Considering our defense I would be ecstatic.

Jeffries!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Considering our defense I would be ecstatic.

You know...that is kind of a good point I guess...but that doesn't say very much for the Bears.

Nobody seriously wants Love back. That didn't work out, the great defense pitiful offense. Lovie was going to get worse as opposed to better (wed be picking #1 overall if we had the same coaching as last year). Certain things he preached though this team lacks, and a huge one is the tenacity to getting the football on D.

 

Hey I don't disagree there, I'm just saying it's idiotic to say a Lovie coached team would have been better WHEN MOST OF THE GUYS ON THE TEAM WERE COACHED BY LOVIE.

 

Also Alshon, I love you.

Alshon MAFUGGIN Jeffrey.

What are the refs watching?

he threw him into the endzone

 

give him the touchdowwwwwn

I'm sure Tucker loved that his players looked foolish. That wasn't your comment and you know it. You're blaming Tucker for some supposed lack of good coaching despite the fact that these guys were coached by the guy you are praising. Just give it up and admit you made an idiotic statement.

There's nothing idiotic in pointing out that the team looked bad in one specific area that Lovie really focused on and always seemed to have his team well-coached in. I really don't know why you think that's such a controversial or absurd idea. That's all anyone ever said. You're being ridiculous on this so I'm done responding at this point.

Hey I don't disagree there, I'm just saying it's idiotic to say a Lovie coached team would have been better WHEN MOST OF THE GUYS ON THE TEAM WERE COACHED BY LOVIE.

 

Also Alshon, I love you.

There's no doubt in my mind the defense would be marginally better but the team would be absolutely awful if Lovie was still coach.

You know...that is kind of a good point I guess...but that doesn't say very much for the Bears.

 

I was going to say....you've seen this defense give up 250-300 RUSHING in a game. Let alone total yards.

What are the refs watching?

this crew is a damn joke. bring back the replacement refs

Smart move not challenging. Don't risk it with these refs.

I was going to say....you've seen this defense give up 250-300 RUSHING in a game. Let alone total yards.

I kinda wonder what the Packers would be putting up on the ground if they were committed to chewing up the game on the ground (and had confidence their #1 rb was healthy).

this crew is a damn joke. bring back the replacement refs

 

Yeah, at least when they f***ed up it hurt the Packers