WestEddy

I would imagine that for every TJS at the beginning of spring training, there's a couple guys who just rested for a month or so over the winter and healed up.

That's great news. The Cease trade is looking better and better.

Bold prediction:

Chris Getz and I would like to order room service in this head of yours. Can you think a menu?

I completely agree with all of this. Yes, he has to start "winning" (I agree with your definition) the Fletcher/Mena, Horn/Thompson trades. So much money and resources have been invested in getting Matt Thompson right to the verge of his real estate career, somebody's got to pay with, at least, a younger version of Matt Thompson.

Yeah, I'd have to say I'm with WS23 here. Looking back on all the position players moved at the deadline, there's not a lot of pizzazz moving one way, or the other. I mean, maybe Getz could be trying to recreate trading up on a paper clip to a house, but there's no number of william bergollas that leap the stream to a top 20 prospect.

Burke's going to start 33 games, and strike out every batter he faces, throwing 33 perfect games. That should equal 891 strikeouts, but he'll probably have to pitch a perfect, 3-strikeout 10th a couple of times, too. Mark it down, you heard it here, first.

So then the kids ignored the father's wishes and picked a franchise that was popular now, even though he had a pretty rough reception from Philadelphia fans? I'd put my money on the family being put off by Reinsdorf's pallid support and shitty remarks that they'd just go with the Phils.

Attacking? LOL. Calm down, already. Nobody attacked anybody. I've been very nice, and make sure to let everyone know that I want them to criticize Reinsdorf, Getz and the White Sox. If you want to call 2024 Hot Garbage, I invite you to. Going forward, I disagree. Simple as that. Need a band-aid? Davis Martin made 10 starts and racked up 0.9 bWAR. Sean Burke made 3 and racked up the same 0.9 bWAR. They weren't the problem. Jonathan Cannon made some adjustments and turned out to be a pretty reliable starter.

Reinsdorf sure didn't help Allen get into the Hall. Is that what you're implying? Or, am I inferring that correctly?

They are investing today. Because they still literally have over a hundred pitchers in their minor league system. A bullpen arm isn't a luxury item. It's like they sold one share of soy futures out of their vast portfolio to buy a car to get to work. Still invested in the future, obtaining a necessity to conduct business in the present.

And we've already had this clarification conversation. If I say a guy like Mason Adams is a legitimate starting pitching prospect, I'm not saying, "Dude, he's super-legit" like he's a sure fire all-star. I'm saying that the team is bringing him along with an eye on getting him major league starter innings. If the Sox pick up, say, Phillip Humber and stow him at AAA, nobody plans for him to be developed into a big league rotational starter, anymore. So, Riley Gowens, or Aldrin Batista have a clear path to big league starter innings if they keep developing. They're legitimate pitching prospects. In the case of Shane Drohan, if the guy wasn't injured, for sure he would have gotten starts before Thorpe, and definitely before Keller and Kuhl. Drohan was mentioned as a rotation option when he was drafted. I don't know if that was bad scouting, or Getz not doing his due diligence, but it happened. I said the Sox had 15 legitimate starting prospects across 4 levels, you asked who, and I listed out about 19-20 guys, including Drohan. I've explained this to you twice, now, and you know it. 2025 - okay, strong is probably the wrong word. Then stable. Sean Burke has been noted in a couple "just missed the top 100" lists. He's a guy. He'll get a chance to start. Davis Martin and Jon Cannon will start games, and will most probably cover 5 innings of those starts. Maybe 6. That will be better than most of the Sox' first month or two of starting pitching in 2024. This, in turn, will keep the bullpen from being taxed like they were in 2024, removing that "excuse".

I think you meant to say that they sold one asset for another asset (and necessity, really) they felt could deliver a quick bump.

Hot garbage? Maybe we just use words differently. You don't think a pitcher having success in the minors is a "pitching prospect" unless he's ranked top 50 in the game, basically. And a guy who has shown he can throw consistent quality starts in the bigs is "Hot garbage". See, you and others can keep declaring every player is garbage, and when that player actually does well, or brings back a good player in trade, nobody cares that you were wrong. I say the word "lockdown" in a heated back and forth once, and that might as well be my screen name. Being negative is a low risk proposition. I guess that's why so many just blurt out negative things. Being slightly negative with a sunny disposition, like I am, gets you branded a kook.

Right. One can either buy a Lotto ticket for a 2029 drawing, or you can get a job, and start drawing a paycheck in 2 weeks. It's also a thing to shore up the bullpen using a teenager who's 5 years away, then trade him for another teenager who's 5 years away, or maybe even a shortstop who's 2 years away.

Bryce

An 18-year-old pitcher who will spend the summer in the complex league won't be of help at the big league level for 5 years. I'm glad you agree the Sox have a decent farm system. We do have a glut of pitching. There's no problem trading an A-ball reliever for bullpen depth. I'm sorry you don't think so.

The rotation should be more settled on OD than last year, with 5 strong starters. Last year, Soroka, Flexen and Nastrini were not major league ready. 5 of Perez, Cannon, Martin, Burke, Thorpe, Wilson, Shane Smith, Nobody said that roster problems are a thing of the past. You even just argued with me when I said starting pitching in the minors is facing a bit of a logjam (roster problems) at some levels. What is it with you guys, and the word "excuse"? To say that they made bad roster decisions isn't an excuse. The words "reason" and "excuse" aren't interchangeable. Learn them, okay? I don't care what you believe. (I can feel you and Tony rising up to now argue that I care...) If Bannister and Katz can't teach a new pitch to a 30 year old reliever who has already experienced some success in the big leagues, then there's no point to anything.

Which is all expected. I'm not saying, "Hmmm, we have 29 guys for 20 spots. We better trade 9 of them." It's not radical to say that some guys are probably going to start at a level below what their development calls for just because of a logjam.

Great, now the Dodgers are going to start signing everybody's GMs.

Well, whatever happened last year, between a bad starting rotation to begin with that just ate up the bullpen early, a bad manager, some bad roster decisions in camp, misreading how to augment what their pitchers had to throw, communication with pitchers who had a bad back, one would expect them to have ironed that out this time around.

I guess I just don't have the ability to separate out people asking a question in earnest and just setting me up to take the piss out of me.

The entire Booser/Fajardo conversation has been that Getz is betting he gets back more in value for Booser than Fajardo was worth coming out of Dominican rookie ball. And he'll get 4 months of bullpen coverage. We all understand that, and you don't need to belabor what, in fact, has been the whole crux of the Booser conversation all along. I'd be shocked if you called any Getz acquisition mediocre.