Everything posted by Chisoxfn
-
Official 2013-2014 College Hoops Thread
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 12:06 PM) They can't win close games and really have a tough time shooting 3s. I don't know what is going on with Aaron White. He disappears for long stretches. This is the first year under Fran the Hawks didn't significantly improve as the season went on. Hopefully it isn't a new trend. And hopefully Fran's 13 year old son will be OK. http://hawkcentral.com/2014/03/11/fran-mcc...earns-of-tumor/ Terrible. Best wishes to the McCaffery's and their son.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 01:30 PM) @RUSSLANDE @AdamSchefter - I think Brandon Weeden could end up as @ChicagoBears backup QB as Coach Trestman worked closely with him leading up to Draft. I can get behind that.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
I want Jared Allen.
-
Missing Malaysian Airliner thread
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 10:56 AM) A senior Malaysian military source is claiming that they tracked the flight for an hour after it disappeared from air traffic control screens. He claims that it turned and the last sign was near the Strait of Malacca, which is on Malaysia's western coast, or the complete opposite side of the country that they have been searching. http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/1.579123 any more truth to this?
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 4m Bears have agreed to terms with S Ryan Mundy on a two-year contract, team announced.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 01:32 PM) So the Bears signed Houston and have yet to cut Peppers? I presume they will wait until Houston signs (but it will happen in the next day or so). Not like you have to be under the cap yet, just need to be under the cap by a certain date (IIRC).
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 01:16 PM) Not familiar with this guy. Is this a good signing? Bennett would have been better but he's pretty young and has gotten better each year. He's shorter then a typical end and heavier. Not what i'd call an explosive pass rusher, however, he's great against the run.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 01:12 PM) Hahaha. To be fair, he will help shore up the run defense too. That was brutal last year. He's great against the run but I still expect him to be able to generate a pass rush. I'd like to add another DE (and this draft isn't the place to find one early), which means I'm targeting Ware or Allen or some sort of veteran pass rusher who can generate the process to play opposite him.
-
Official 2013-2014 College Hoops Thread
QUOTE (fathom @ Mar 8, 2014 -> 06:49 PM) Iowa's effort on defense is so sad. Not quite sure what happened to them. Don't ask me. So disappointing down the stretch. That said, that disappointment can turn with a good showing here on out. They clearly have the talent.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (SoxAce @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 08:38 AM) Started today son. Not yet; It doesn't start until 3 PM EST.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
Sounds like the Bears people should have shut their mouths. I hope this stuff was coming from Bennett's camp and not the Bears. I can see why Bennett would have done it as I don't blame him for wanting to stay in Seattle (and this probably helped get Seattle serious enough). I'd have taken him at that contract. Very fair deal.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 8, 2014 -> 07:17 PM) Jackson wants what Riley has going on. The credit without the work If Phil ends up in NY, Melo isn't coming to Chicago.
-
Reinsdorf son dies
Condolences to the Reinsdorf family.
-
Official 2013-2014 College Hoops Thread
B10 is insanely deep.
-
Trade for Nomar that never happened
That was a pretty well documented rumor on Soxtalk from what I recall. I had forgotten all about it.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
Hell of a performance by the Bulls last night. Its why I'd be livid if Jerry didn't realize how good he has it with Thibbs and did anything to piss Thibbs off. This off-season needs to be about finding talent and making Thibbs a happy camper. Jo was impressive, same with Jimmy and Taj is just beasting.
-
Favorite Airlines
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 26, 2014 -> 01:26 PM) Flying overseas, biz or 1st class is a HUGE bonus when you can get it. Domestic flights it is a lot less value IMO, unless you are going coast to coast maybe. Anything overseas, it is a huge huge plus. The service is very very nice. Its what I safe my miles for haha.
-
Six Californias
QUOTE (Jake @ Feb 26, 2014 -> 10:25 AM) Seems like the state is only not governable if you're a Republican like the petitioner Its a f***ing disaster. 6th largest economy in the world and its ruined by moronic legislation and incompetent boobs who run the state and my vote will never matter cause its so far blue it isn't even funny. Last time the state was decently ran was under a republican and its been a long time since that happened and no, i'm not counting the governator. We will continue to hand out fat pensions and spend beyond our means and then keep asking the people of the state to pay more in taxes for benefits private sector employees could only dream of, why, because those sort of benefits are not sustainable and not necessary (especially when you also pay far more then the private sector).
-
Favorite Airlines
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 26, 2014 -> 07:57 AM) Except then the peons take all of the overhead space, and the first/business class people paying top dollar for tickets won't have that. My favorite and only enjoyable part of business travel is when I've flown first / business (which is rare and our companies policy is only for flights over like 5 hours, which will happen on ocassions from the west to east coast). I really don't understand how an individual could pay a full first / business fare though (or logically justify the cost). Only way I'm ever doing it on my own dime is with my points. And that doesn't mean I enjoy flying, its just a lot less tiresome of an experience because you have space and service and somewhat edible food.
-
Favorite Airlines
QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 07:01 PM) Planes that have assigned seating should board back to front. At least in the normal cabin. Takes so long to board the plane because the family in row 15 has to unload all their crap up top, into the seats, then finally get in, while everyone else behind them waits. Repeat over and over and over. It's the most inefficient process. All for 5-10 minutes of boarding earlier? What's the rush? You know you have a seat, and rarely, if ever, have I seen them not be able to take everyone's carry on in the bins or in the closet. Are you guys really seeing that happen a lot? It's the funniest damn thing, every time. People rush to line up way ahead of their group being called, then bull rush to get in...all to sit there and wait some more. Things would be so much more efficient if they just boarded a few rows at a time, back to front. I've never given a s*** if I'm in group A, B, C, D, whatever...we're all going to the same place, I have to wait on the plane a shorter amount of time, and I have a seat waiting for me. Now a days, it is crucial to get your carry ons on (more often then not the compartments get full so you really do need to get on board that plane early). The airline will let you check for free but since I'm traveling for business, the last thing I want to do is chance my luggage getting lost and/or spend anymore time at the airport waiting then I need to.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 08:20 AM) It was the norm back then to value companies based on an idea with no execution. Nowadays you have to at least have 100 mil in revenue in my industry to think about IPO. It takes a lot of success to reach 100 mil in annual revenue. Thats the main difference I see. Idea companies arent getting valued at billions of dollars. And revenue means zilch without ability to have margins and actually make sustainable profits. Look at what companies would have to actually do from an overall performance perspective to sensibly be worth what the multiples are, etc. It is impossible. Maybe one of them pans out and becomes some huge thing, the rest will come crashing back down to reality. Again, I'm not saying they will be bad companies.....no no no. A lot of these are very good, sound companies, what they aren't are 20B companies and companies that are going to become mainstays on the fortune 100 lists, fortune 500 lists, etc.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Jake @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 07:13 AM) It seems to me that cloud storage should have wonderfully high margins if you want it to How and Why? I think some people are missing on the concept that there are minimal barriers to entry in the space. You charge a lot and have fat margins and people will enter the market relatively easily. I agree that the marketplace for cloud is pretty big, but the ability to make fat profits and support the P/E ratios and multiples that this stuff is getting traded at is impossible. You also have companies that have major concerns still about the overall security of the cloud. I won't go into details about it, but it is a real issue at some very very large companies.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 07:06 AM) Thats kind of the norm these days for start ups. You are putting every single dime back into dev and your people. We arent profitable but we are going IPO and will have a nice valuation. Tech companies are like that. It was the norm back when the last tech bubble happened to. Doesn't make it a right decision. Same thing with the housing bubble.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 05:50 AM) It doesn't work like that when you're in a bubble -- and make no mistake -- we are in the middle of a second tech bubble. Of course, like Warren Buffett says, investing is like sex, and it feels best right before it pops. Those that don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it, and that's exactly what's happening now. .com v1.0 - people didn't understand the Internet, and didn't want to miss the boat on the next big industry, so they invested in anything/everything that contained a .com or had a website, no matter how shaky or stupid the idea actually was. .com v2.0 - people still don't understand the Internet, social medias place on the Internet, where cloud computing is going, and once again, they don't want to miss the boat. They're overvaluing everything on "potential" future profits to the tune of insanity, and of these investments, a handful will emerge victorious, becoming the next Microsoft or Google. Apple is one of the most financially successful companies in the history of world, churning out unseen profits for almost a decade now, and at their absolute peak profit earning power, it's P/E never eclipsed 20. Think about that for a second. We're talking about one of the most successful profit generating companies EVER. Meanwhile, they're speculating on "potential" future earnings from other companies like NetFlix, Amazon, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc...pumping their valuations into the stratosphere. Now, for arguments sake, let's say they're right. Let's say Amazon somehow starts making money (after two decades of NOT making money), even if they blew away any realistic number you can imagine, what I can safely say they will NOT do is make more money than Apple did at it's peak, therefore the speculated earnings potential is insane based on it's P/E ratio alone. To justify some of these P/E ratios (or even their future P/E ratios, if they ever even materialize), these companies would not only need to start making profits, but they'd have to start making profits to the tune of multiple times what Apple was making at it's peak. Now, re-read that last line. Because that's never going to happen in bottom feeding profit industries like retail or media (aka Amazon/Netflix). That's not to say they can't make money (NetFlix does), but with profit margins of about 4% they're not going to see profits like Apple or Exxon. Y2, you are preaching to the choir on this. It literally blows my mind.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Feb 25, 2014 -> 07:11 AM) I really like Dennard. Very physical and knows how to disrupt a WR. Will be a good one. I do too. If we could resign Melton and Ratliff (or find another DE to go with one of them), I'd be okay drafting Dennard. I think he's going to be a real good corner.